19세기 후반 타슈켄트 도시공간의 구조와 러시아 제국 권력의 재현
The Spatial Structure of Tashkent and Representation of Power of Russian Empire in the late of Nineteenth Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article attempts to examine the spatial structure of Tashkent as a colonial city and the capital of Turkestan Government-Generalship of the Russian Empire. Capitals are distinguished from other cities because they function as a special site for the representation political power. After having been conquered by force, Tashkent became the capital city of Turkestan Government-Generalship and a political, administrative, military, and cultural center for colonial rule of the Russian Empire in Central Asia. Tsarist officials tried to transplant St. Petersburg, the imperial capital, into Tashkent. The Russian government constructed a modern and new city on the right side of the old city of the ancient Silk Road, instead of entering the urban space of old civilization. In doing so, the Russian government separated the new city from the old one. This article intends to examine not only the characters of Tashkent’s spatial structure itself but also how its urban space was reconstituted by the Russian colonial rule, in other words, the properties of Turkestan policy of the Russian Empire. In conclusion, this paper argues that 'modern' urban space constructed by Russian Empire in Tashkent, in fact was not only 'pre-modern' space projected on the aspirations, fear, ignorance of ruling powers in the colony, but also 'paradoxical' space based on the isolation of the indigenous peoples.
Abstract
This article attempts to examine the spatial structure of Tashkent as a colonial city and the capital of Turkestan Government-Generalship of the Russian Empire. Capitals are distinguished from other cities because they function as a special site for the representation political power. After having been conquered by force, Tashkent became the capital city of Turkestan Government-Generalship and a political, administrative, military, and cultural center for colonial rule of the Russian Empire in Central Asia. Tsarist officials tried to transplant St. Petersburg, the imperial capital, into Tashkent. The Russian government constructed a modern and new city on the right side of the old city of the ancient Silk Road, instead of entering the urban space of old civilization. In doing so, the Russian government separated the new city from the old one. This article intends to examine not only the characters of Tashkent’s spatial structure itself but also how its urban space was reconstituted by the Russian colonial rule, in other words, the properties of Turkestan policy of the Russian Empire. In conclusion, this paper argues that 'modern' urban space constructed by Russian Empire in Tashkent, in fact was not only 'pre-modern' space projected on the aspirations, fear, ignorance of ruling powers in the colony, but also 'paradoxical' space based on the isolation of the indigenous peoples.
참고문헌 (49)
- Бартольд, В. В., "История культурной жизни Туркестана" (1927), Изд-воАкадемии наук СССР
- Бартольд, В. В, "Сочинения, Т. 3, Работы по исторической географии" (2002), Изд-во восточной литературы
- Верещагин, В, "Повести. Очерки. Воспоминания" (1990), Сов. Россия
- Добросмыслов, А. И., "Ташкент в прошлом и настоящем, Ташкент:Электро-паровая типолитография О. А" (1912), Порцева
- Межов, Владимир Измайлович, "Туркестанский сборник сочиненій истатей, относящихся до средней Азіи вообще и Туркестанскаго краяв особенности: систематическій и азбучные указатели сочиненій истатей на русском и иностранном языках" (1878), тип. В.Безобразова и К°
- Семёнов, А. А, "Кауфманский сборник, изданный в память 25лет истекших со дня смерти покорителя и устройтеля Туркестанскогокрая" (1910), Т-ва И. Н. Кушнерев
- Семенов-Тянь-Шанский В. П, "Россия: Полное географическоеописание нашего отечества" (1899), Изд. А. Ф. Девриена
- Семенов-Тянь-Шанский В. П, "Россия: Полное географическоеописание нашего отечества" (1913), Изд. А. Ф. Девриена
- Энциклопедический словарь Брокгауза и Ефрона, , XXXIV(67), СПб, ~ (1901)
- 기계형, "18-19세기 이중수도의 형성:상뜨 뻬쩨르부르그와 모스끄바", 서양사론, (88), pp.31~62 (2006), 한국서양사학회
- 기계형, "러시아제국의 투르케스탄 정복과 권력의 시각적 재현: 화가 바실리 베레샤긴의 ‘투르케스탄 회화'", 슬라브학보, 27(4), pp.25~56 (2012), 한국슬라브학회
- 중앙아시아 주요 도시의 변천: 식민지시대 도시에서 현대 국민국가도시로의 발전모델, "김상철", 대외경제정책연구원, 9~71, pp.중앙아시아2 (2011)
- 렐프, 에드워드, "장소와 장소상실" (2011), 논형
- 허효영, "시간과 공간의 기호학" (1996), 열린책들
- 박경환, "포스트식민주의의 지리:권력과 재현의 공간" (2011), 여이연
- 전종한, "종족집단의 경관과 장소" (2005), 논형
- 코스토프, 스피로, "역사로 본 도시의 모습, 양윤재 옮김" (1991), 공간사
- 구동회, "공간과 장소" (1995), 대윤
- Абашин, Сергей Николаевич и др, "Центральная Азия в составеРоссийской империи" (2008), Новое литературное обозрение
- Герасимов, И., "Новая империальная история, Казань: Центр ИсследованийНационализма и Империи", ~ (2004)
- Глущенко, Евгений, "Герои Империи: портреты российских колони-альных деятелей" (2001), XXI век-Согласие
- Горшенина, Светлана, "Крупнейшие проекты колониальных архивовРоссии утопичность тотальной Туркестаники генерал-губернатора Констан-тина Петровича фон Кауфмана", Ab Imperio, (3), pp.291~354 (2007)
- Зияев, Х. З., "История Ташкента с древнейшихвремен до победы февральской буржуазно-демократической революции" (1988), Изд-во «фан» УзССР
- Лежан, Г, "Русские в Средней Азии", Записки для чтения, (10, pp.11) (1867), ~
- Лотман Ю., "Символика Петербурга и проблемы семиотики города, In Труды по знаковым системам", pp.30~44 (1984), Метафизика Петер-бурга
- Нильсен, В. А., "Архитектурный декор памятниковУзбекистана" (1974), Стройиздат
- Соколов, Юри, "Ташкент, Ташкенцы, Россия, Ташкент" (1965), Узбекистан
- Тошкент 2200, "Ташкент", ~ (2009)
- Хидоятов, Г. А., "История Узбекистана" (2003), Узинкомцентр
- Baron, Nick, "New Spatial Histories of 20th-Century Russia and the Soviet Union: Exploring the Terrain", Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 9(2), pp.433~447 (2008)
- Celik, Zeyn, "Urban Forms and Colonial Confrontations: Algiers under French Rule" (1997), University of California Press
- Gerasimov, I., "Gardening empire as "Civiluzing process"", Ab Imperio, (3), pp.11~17 (2008)
- Home, Robert, "Of Planting and Planning : The making of British colonial cities" (1997), E & FN Spon
- Hopkins, Anthony G., "Back to the Future: From National History to Imperial History", Past and Present, 164, pp.203~204 (1999)
- Howe, Stephen, "The New Imperial Histories Readers" (2010), Routledge
- Khalid, Adeeb, "The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform : Jadism in Central Asia" (1998), University of California Press
- Kosmarski, Artyom, "Grandeur and Decay of the 'Soviet Byzantium' Spaces, Peoples and Memories of Tashkent, Uzbekistan, In Urban Spaces after Socialism: Ethnographies of Public Places in Eurasian Cities", pp.33~50 (2011), Campus Verlag
- Legg, Stephen, "Spaces of Colonialism: Delhi's Urban Governmentalities" (2007), Blackwell
- Low, Setha, "The Anthropology of Cities: Imagining and Theorizing the City", Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, pp.383~409 (1996)
- MacKenzie, David, "The Lion of Tashkent: the career of General M. G. Cherniaev" (1974), University of Georgia Press
- Morrison, Alexander, "Russian Rule in Turkestan and the Example of British India", Slavonic & East European Review, 84(4) (2006)
- Morrison, Alexander, "Russian, Rule in Samarkand, 1868-1910: A Comparison with British India" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Relph, Edward, "Place and Placelessness" (1976), Pion Ltd
- Rotenberg, Robert, "The Cultural Meaning of Urban Space" (1993), Bergin and Garvey
- Sahadeo, Jeff, "Epidemic and Empire: Ethnicity, Class, and "Civilization" in the 1892 Tashkent Cholera Riot", Slavic Review, 64(1), pp.117~139 (2005)
- Sahadeo, Jeff, "Russian Colonial Society in Tashkent, 1865-1923" (2007), Indiana University Press
- Schimmelpenninck, David van der Oye, "Vasilij V. Vereshchagin's Canvases of Central Asian Conquest", Cahiers d’Asie centrale, 17(18), pp.179~209 (2009)
- Schimmelpenninck, David van der Oye, "Russian Orientalism" (2010), Yale University Press
- Tuan, Yi-Fu, "Space and Place: The Perspective of Experienc" (1977), University of Minnesota Press