汉韩将来时表达对比研究
A Comparative Study of Future in Chinese and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Through an investigation about means of expression and semantic characteristics of future in both Korean and Chinese, this paper introduces detailed case studies about translation of future in both languages. It is implied in the investigation that incaseof conjectural mood -겠-, -을 것이- and -(으)ㄹ in Korean correspond with Chinese modal verbs, such as 可能 and 会 at most time. But in a few cases of conjectural mood, -겠-, -을 것이- and -(으)ㄹ will be translated into 要. When conveying one’s intention, -겠- is mostly translated into 要. However, translation will make the future in Chinese go opposite in Korean. In most cases of conjectural mood, 要 is translated into -겠- in Korean. But when 要 is conveying one’s intention, it corresponds with Korean conjunctive, –려고. Such a phenomenon shows that two grammatical elements cannot obtain one-to-one correspondence even if they share similar meaning during translating. In another word, a successful translation in this case can only be achieved in a special form that can express the central meaning of target language. To sum up, the correspondence between -겠- and 要 shows that the central meaning of -겠- is not intentional but conjectural, while the core meaning of 要 is intentional instead of being conjectural, though both of them can express one’s conjectural mood and intention.
Abstract
Through an investigation about means of expression and semantic characteristics of future in both Korean and Chinese, this paper introduces detailed case studies about translation of future in both languages. It is implied in the investigation that incaseof conjectural mood -겠-, -을 것이- and -(으)ㄹ in Korean correspond with Chinese modal verbs, such as 可能 and 会 at most time. But in a few cases of conjectural mood, -겠-, -을 것이- and -(으)ㄹ will be translated into 要. When conveying one’s intention, -겠- is mostly translated into 要. However, translation will make the future in Chinese go opposite in Korean. In most cases of conjectural mood, 要 is translated into -겠- in Korean. But when 要 is conveying one’s intention, it corresponds with Korean conjunctive, –려고. Such a phenomenon shows that two grammatical elements cannot obtain one-to-one correspondence even if they share similar meaning during translating. In another word, a successful translation in this case can only be achieved in a special form that can express the central meaning of target language. To sum up, the correspondence between -겠- and 要 shows that the central meaning of -겠- is not intentional but conjectural, while the core meaning of 要 is intentional instead of being conjectural, though both of them can express one’s conjectural mood and intention.
참고문헌 (22)
- 郭昭军, "汉语情态问题研究", 박사, pp.2003
- 李铁根, "现代汉语时制研究" (1998), 沈阳: 辽宁大学出版社
- 李铁根, "汉语“将”和韩国语“-겠-”的异同考察", 中国语文学论集, (42) (2007)
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1980), 北京:商务印书馆
- 尚 新, "英汉体范畴对比研究-语法体的内部对立与中立化" (2007), 上海人民出版社
- 石毓智, "将来时标记向认识情态功能的衍生", 解放军外国语学院学报, (1) (2007)
- 张济卿, "汉语并非没有时制语法范畴-谈时、体研究中的几个问题", 语文研究, (4) (1996)
- 张万禾, "现代汉语将来时范畴", 汉语学习, (5) (2008)
- 고영근, "한국어의 시제, 서법, 동작상" (2007), 서울, 태학사
- 고영근, "국어의 통사ㆍ의미론" (1993), 서울, 탑출판사
- 김성화, "현대국어의 상 연구" (1992), 서울, 한신문화사
- 남기심, "현대 국어 통사론" (2001), 서울, 태학사
- 서정수, "“겠”에 관하여", 말, 2 (1977)
- 서정수, "‘ㄹ 것’에 관하여-‘겠’과의 대비를 중심으로", 국어학, 6 (1978), 국어학회
- 서정수, "현대 국어문법론" (1996), 서울, 한양대학교 출판부
- 양정석, "한국어 통사구조론" (2005), 서울, 한국문화사
- 양정석, "한국어 시간요소들의 형태통사론", 언어, 33(4), pp.693~722 (2008), 한국언어학회
- 양정석, "무시제 가설 하에서의 시간 해석 방법", 배달말, (43), pp.121~178 (2008), 배달말학회
- 염재일, "`-겠'과 `-을 것'의 양태 비교 연구", 언어와 정보, 9(2), pp.1~22 (2005), 한국언어정보학회
- 이남순, "‘겠’과 ‘ㄹ 것’", 관악어문연구, 6 (1981), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 이재성, "한국어의 시제와 상" (2001), 국학자료원
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1971), 서울, 정음문화사
