汉语情态动词"要"与韩语相应情态词尾的对比 —— 以语义、句法特征为中心 —
A Comparative Study on Chinese Modal Verb “yao” and the Corresponding Korean Modal Suffixes
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This dissertation has discussed Chinese modal verb yao and the Corresponding Korean modal suffixes “-ya ha-”, “-ryeo-go ha-”, “–l geos-i-”, “-gess-”. Chinese “yao” expresses many modal meaning, that is three modal meanings—Necessity, obligation and intention. The modality expressions of the two languages can correspond semantically, but the actual correspondence could vary depending on other sentence constituents, such as person of subject, combination with other constituents, word order when combining other modal expressions etc. When “yao” express deontic modality—obligative, it corresponds with Korean Deontic modal suffix “-ya ha-”; When “yao” express Dynamic Modality—volitive, according to the constrains of syntactic, it corresponds with Korean Dynamic Modal Suffixes “-ryeo-go ha-“, “-l geos-i-“, “-gess-”. When “yao” express epistemic Modality—deductive, according to the constrains of syntactic, it corresponds with Korean epistemic Modal Suffixes “-l geos-i-“, “-gess-”. Based on scholars' present researches, this paper analyzes modal meaning and syntactic feature of Chinese Modal Verb “yao” and the corresponding Korean Modal Suffixes “-ya ha-”, “-ryeo-go ha-”, “-l geos-i-”, “-gess-”, and then compares the differences of their syntactic semantic，such as person of subject, combination with other constituents, word order when combining other modal expressions etc.
Abstract
This dissertation has discussed Chinese modal verb yao and the Corresponding Korean modal suffixes “-ya ha-”, “-ryeo-go ha-”, “–l geos-i-”, “-gess-”. Chinese “yao” expresses many modal meaning, that is three modal meanings—Necessity, obligation and intention. The modality expressions of the two languages can correspond semantically, but the actual correspondence could vary depending on other sentence constituents, such as person of subject, combination with other constituents, word order when combining other modal expressions etc. When “yao” express deontic modality—obligative, it corresponds with Korean Deontic modal suffix “-ya ha-”; When “yao” express Dynamic Modality—volitive, according to the constrains of syntactic, it corresponds with Korean Dynamic Modal Suffixes “-ryeo-go ha-“, “-l geos-i-“, “-gess-”. When “yao” express epistemic Modality—deductive, according to the constrains of syntactic, it corresponds with Korean epistemic Modal Suffixes “-l geos-i-“, “-gess-”. Based on scholars' present researches, this paper analyzes modal meaning and syntactic feature of Chinese Modal Verb “yao” and the corresponding Korean Modal Suffixes “-ya ha-”, “-ryeo-go ha-”, “-l geos-i-”, “-gess-”, and then compares the differences of their syntactic semantic，such as person of subject, combination with other constituents, word order when combining other modal expressions etc.
참고문헌 (38)
- 강현화, "한국어교육 문법" (2016), 한글파크
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (2005), 탑출판사
- 박재연, "한국어 양태어미 연구" (2006), 태학사
- 장경희, "한국어의 양태 범주 연구" (1985), 탑출판사
- 의 양태표지 연구, "한국어학", 2002, 1~236, pp.한국어학회
- 다카치토모나리, "다의성 분석의 입장에서 바라본 ‘-겠-’의 의미구조", 언어, 36(1), pp.93~116 (2011), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 박선옥, "국어 보조동사 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2003
- 박숙영, "의지 표현들의 의지 정도성 비교 －‘-겠어요’, ‘-(으)ㄹ거예요’, ‘-(으)ㄹ래요’, ‘-(으)ㄹ게요’를 중심으로－", 언어와 문화, 2(2), pp.21~40 (2006), 한국언어문화교육학회[DOI]
- 서정수, ""ㄹ 것"에 관하여", 국어학, 6, pp.85~110 (1978)
- 성기철, "경험과 추정: '-겠-'과 '-을 것이-'를 중심으로", 문법연구, 4, pp.109~129 (1979)
- 신창순, "현대 한국어의 용언 보조어간 '겠'의 의의와 용법", 조선학보, 6, pp.119~140 (1972)
- 안명철, "현대국어의 양상 연구", 국어연구, 56 (1983)
- 이기용, "언어와 추정", 국어학, 6, pp.29~64 (1978)
- 이영, "한국어 교육을 위한 한·중 양태 표현의 대조 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
- 장경희, "Tense, Aspect and Mood", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 20(3), pp.191~205 (1995)
- 장채린, "한국어 의지·의도 표현들의 의미 비교 - ‘-겠-’, ‘-을 것이-’, ‘-을게(요)’, ‘-을래(요)’를 중심으로 -", 한국어 의미학, 56, pp.1~34 (2017), 한국어의미학회
- 전혜자, "선어말어미 ‘-겠-’이 사용된 문장의 세 가지 특징―구어에서 보이는 ‘현장성’, ‘주체의 고정성’ 및 ‘전제성’에 대하여―", 한글, (301), pp.43~82 (2013), 한글학회
- 주 림, "한국어와 중국어의 양태 표현 대조 연구", 박사, pp.2014
- "现代汉语词典 第7版", ~ (2016)
- 丁声树, "现代汉语语法讲话" (1961), 商务印书馆
- 高名凯, "汉语语法论" (1986), 科学出版社
- 国家对外汉语教学领导小组办公室汉语水平考试部, "汉语水平等级标准与语法等级大纲" (1998), 高等教育出版社
- 胡裕树, "现代汉语" (1981), 上海教育出版社
- 胡裕树, "动词研究" (1995), 河南大学出版社
- 刘月华等, "实用现代汉语语法" (1983), 外语教学与研究出版社
- 吕叔湘, "汉语语法分析问题" (1979), 商务印书馆
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1980), 商务印书馆
- 彭利贞, "现代汉语情态研究", 博士, pp.2005
- 汤廷池, "国语语法研究论集" (1979), 学生书局
- 王力, "王力文集 2卷" (1985), 山东教育出版社
- 朱德熙, "语法讲义" (1982), 商务印书馆
- 朱丽云, "实用对外汉语重点难点词语教学词典" (2009), 北京大学出版社
- 郭昭军, "助动词“要”的模态多义性及其制约因素", 汉语学习, 2, pp.35~40 (2008)
- 李颖, "汉语助动词"要"和韩语辅助动词"-"的对比", 科学文汇, 11, pp.162~163 (2010)
- 李颖, "试比较汉韩情态表达方式", 科教文汇(中旬刊), 05, pp.122~125 (2013)
- 齐沪扬, "情态语气范畴中语气词的功能分析", 南京师范大学学报, 3, pp.141~152 (2002)
- 王振来, "论能愿动词的语义类别", 辽宁工学院学报(社会科学版), 1, pp.62~64 (2002)
- 朱清, "基于HSK动态作文语料库“要”的情态义项习得考察", 硕士, pp.2016