국가는 우리에게 무엇을 해주어야 하는가?: 모스크바 시민들의 국가에 대한 기대
What Should the State Do to Us?
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at reinterpretation of the strong state phenomenon of Russia from the perspective of ordinary Russians citizens. With understanding of Russians’ perception of the state, the paper analyzes the reasons of collapse of the state even though the Russians belong to a powerful imperial state and established socialist state. Historical experiences have shown that Russian perceived the country as either the control state or the beneficiary state because of limited participation in the political process. When political leader’s power became extremely strong, Russian are likely to pursue the favor without resistance. However, when strong political elites cannot provide social benefit anymore, Russian have resisted and changed not only political elites but also political regime. This study surveyed to Moscow citizens on the basis of questionaries. On the basis of questionnaire survey data, Moscow citizens prefer welfare state to regulatory one. This may explain why Russia suffered from low institutionalization in the process of transition period. As a result, Russia ruled by powerful political leader and the personal capability of political leader dominant actor of political scene. In case of economic difficulties, if political leader may not provide social provision to people, then the state could be fallen into a big mess. Thus, while Putin has strong power, the state should be institutionalized instead of ad hoc basis.
Abstract
This study aims at reinterpretation of the strong state phenomenon of Russia from the perspective of ordinary Russians citizens. With understanding of Russians’ perception of the state, the paper analyzes the reasons of collapse of the state even though the Russians belong to a powerful imperial state and established socialist state. Historical experiences have shown that Russian perceived the country as either the control state or the beneficiary state because of limited participation in the political process. When political leader’s power became extremely strong, Russian are likely to pursue the favor without resistance. However, when strong political elites cannot provide social benefit anymore, Russian have resisted and changed not only political elites but also political regime. This study surveyed to Moscow citizens on the basis of questionaries. On the basis of questionnaire survey data, Moscow citizens prefer welfare state to regulatory one. This may explain why Russia suffered from low institutionalization in the process of transition period. As a result, Russia ruled by powerful political leader and the personal capability of political leader dominant actor of political scene. In case of economic difficulties, if political leader may not provide social provision to people, then the state could be fallen into a big mess. Thus, while Putin has strong power, the state should be institutionalized instead of ad hoc basis.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김남섭, "“우리 안의 스딸린”: 스딸린 테러와 러시아인들의 기억", 러시아연구, 14(2), pp.307~336 (2004), 러시아연구소
- 김상현, "숨은 지문의 사회학으로 본 농업집단화와 소비에트 농담민속(Jokeslore)", 슬라브硏究, 26(2), pp.1~38 (2010), 러시아연구소
- 노경덕, "토니 클리프, 정성진 옮김, 『소련은 과연 사회주의였는가?: 국가자본주의론의 분석』 (책갈피, 2011)", 서양사론, (114), pp.401~406 (2012), 한국서양사학회
- 조호연, "러시아의 역사." (2011), 까치글방
- 레데네바, "러시아를 움직이는 힘" (2013), 한울
- 로렌쯔, 리하르트, "소련 사회사 I" (1987), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 조준래, "러시아 사상가" (2008), 생각의 나무
- 솔제니친, "이반 데니소비치, 수용소의 하루" (1998), 민음사
- 전상인, "국가처럼 보기" (2010), 에코리브르
- 이상준, "러시아 시장개혁과 노동시장의 형성 :노동력의 이동과 임금결정과정을 중심으로", 중소연구, 28(4), pp.93~120 (2005), 아태지역연구센터
- 정한구, "푸틴-메드베데프 체제의 출범과 러시아 정치의 장래", 세종정책연구, 5(1), pp.5~34 (2009)
- 찌모쉬나, 따찌야나, "러시아 경제사" (2006), 한길사
- 최우익, "러시아 국민들의 시장경제에 대한 의식과 태도", 슬라브학보, 23(1), pp.291~322 (2008), 한국슬라브학회
- 정성진, "소련은 과연 사회주의였는가?" (2011), 책갈피
- 톰슨, 존 M., "20세기 러시아 현대사" (2004), 사회평론
- 파이프스, 리처드, "공산주의" (2006), 을유문화사
- 김상현, "러시아인의 삶, 농노의 수기로 읽다" (2011), 민속원
- Ashwin, Sarah, "Redefining the collective: Russian mineworkers in transition, In Uncertain Transition:Ethnographies of Change in the Postsocialist World", pp.245~273 (1999), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
- Filtzer, Donald, "Soviet Workers and Stalinist Industrialization : The Formation of Modern Soviet Production Relations, 1928–1941" (1986), M. E. Sharpe
- Fitzpatrick, Sheila, "Stalin's Peasants: Resistance and Survival in the Russian Village After Collectivization" (1996), Oxford University Press
- Ledeneva, Alena V., "Russia's Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Ledeneva, Alena V., "Continuity and Changes of Blat Practices in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia, In Bribery and Blat in Russia", pp.181~204 (2000), MacMillan Press
- Ludlam, Janine, "Reform and the Redefinition of the Social Contract under Gorbachev", World Politics, 43(2), pp.284~312 (1991)
- Petrov, K. Ye., "Dominirovanie kontseptual’noi mnogoznachnosti: ‘sil’noe gosudarstvo v rossiiskom diskurse", Polis, (3), pp.166~170 (2006)
- Platonov, Andrei, "Trans Anthorny Olcott" (1978), Ardis
- Pokrovsky, Nikolai, "Traditions in the History of the Russian Peasantry, In Roots of Russia: Paving the Way", pp.31~40 (1995), Nova Science Publishers
- Solnick, Steven Lee, "Stealing the State: Control and Collapse in Soviet Institutions" (1998), Harvard University Press
- Treisman, Daniel, "Russian Politics in a Time of Economic Turmoil, In Russia after the Global Economic Crisis", pp.39~57 (2010), Peterson Institute for International Economics
- Viola, Lynne, "Peasant Rebels under Stalin: Collectivization and the Culture of Peasant Resistance" (1996), Oxford University Press