본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

러시아어 상관관계구문의 통시적 발전과 변이형

Diachronic Development of the Russian Correlative Construction and Its Variations

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 논문은 러시아어의 수식적 관계대명사절(restrictive relative clause)의 발달과정에 있어서 상관관계대명사 구문이 전이적 단계의 핵심적인 역할을 하였다는 이론적 가정을 기반으로 한다. 이러한 이론적 가정을 뒷받침하기 위하여 먼저 상관관계구문이 인도유럽어 대명사 *kwi-/kwo-의 비한정적 의미에 기초하여 통시적으로 발전하였음을 밝힌다. 구문의 첫 번째 발전단계로 비한정대명사와 어휘적 명사가 동일한 격 형태로 표지되는 것에 주목하여 둘 사이에 주어-술어 관계처럼 본원적인 관계가 존재한다고 가정한다. 비한정 대명사 čto의 양적 의미가 주변화되고 절 유형을 결정짓게 되는 [WH] 자질의 강화에 따라 해당 대명사는 소절을 기반으로 한 구조에서 벗어나 문두로 이동할 수 있게 되며 이를 통하여 상관관계구문이 형성된다고 가정한다. 그리고 노브고로드 자작나무 문서에 나타나는 구문의 변이양상을 통해 이러한 이론적 가정, 특히 구문의 과도기적 발전 가설이 뒷받침된다. 마지막으로 상관관계구문의 관계절과 주절의 어순 도치, 그리고 상관관계대명사가 더 이상 사용되지 않게 되는 현상 등을 야기한 의미, 통사적 변화에 대하여 알아본다.

Abstract

This paper reconstructs the diachronic development of the Russian correlative construction, which is crucially assumed to have formed an intermediate stage in the development of the postposed restrictive relative clause. It is argued here as an initial stage that the indefinite, not interrogative, usage of the Indo-European pronoun *kwi-/kwo- should have constituted a small-clause like phrase with a lexical noun. As a k-word (an equivalent to a wh-word) čto is obtaining a [wh] feature and losing a quantificational force inherent in the indefinite sense, it may well be fronted to a sentence initial position, where a clause is to be typed either as interrogative or as topic-initial construction. The proposed diachronic scenario has several significant theoretical implications. First, the structure in Stage I supports the claim that case interpretation and case valuation can be separated. Second, a quantification force in k-words motivate the budding stage of the correlative construction. Third, two prominent features in k-words, namely [wh] and quantificational, are distinct, one being primary and the other peripheral.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Belyaev, O., "The genesis of wh-based correlatives: from indefinites to relativization", Paper presented at Sinn und Bedeutung 2014 (2014)
  2. Bertollo, S., "The syntax of Italian free relative clauses:An analysis", GG@G(Generative Grammar in Geneva), (8), pp.59~76 (2012)
  3. Borkovskij, V. I., "Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka" (1963), Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR
  4. Dayal, V., "Quantification in Natural Languages", pp.179~205 (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  5. Delbrück, B., "Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen, Vol. III" (1900), Karl J. Trübner
  6. Filin, F. P., "Iz istorii sintaksisa vostočnoslavjanskix jazykov o forme imenitel'nogo padeža imen žen. roda na -a(-ja) v značenii akkuzativa", Voprosy Jazykoznanija, (3), pp.70~81 (1969)
  7. Foolen, Ad., "Studies in Linguistic Motivation", pp.75~100 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
  8. Garret, A., "Relative clause syntax in Lycian and Hittite", Die Sprache, (36), pp.29~69 (1994)
  9. Givón, T., "Relative Clauses in Languages of the Americas. A Typological Overview", pp.3~25 (2012), John Benjamins
  10. Grković-Major, J., "The role of syntactic transitivity in the development of Slavic syntactic structures", Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband, 74, pp.63~74 (2009)
  11. Hahn, E. A., "The origin of the relative kwi- kwo-", Language, (22), pp.68~85 (1946)
  12. Haspelmath, M., "Indefinite pronouns" (1997), Oxford University Press
  13. Hendery, R., "Relative clauses in time and space" (2012), John Benjamins
  14. Hirt, H., "Indogermanische Grammatik. Teil VII:Syntax II Die Lehre vom einfachen und zusammengesetzten Satz" (1937), Carl Winter
  15. Hopper, P., "Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  16. Ickler, N. L., "The Particle ‘že’ in Old Russian: The Discourse Origins of Conditionals and Relative", PhD, pp.1981
  17. Isačenko, A. B., "Problemy sovremennoj filologii. Sbornik statej k semidesjatiletiju akademika V. V. Vinogradova", pp.159~166 (1965), Nauka
  18. Kayne, R. S., "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT
  19. Keršiene, R. B., "Istoričesakaja grammatika russkogo jazyka: Sintaksis. Složnoe predloženie", pp.56~109 (1979), Nauka
  20. Kosta, P., "Case and Agree in Slavic numerals – Valuation of features at the interfaces within a Phase-based model", LingBuzz
  21. Kwon, K., "Cyclical Change", pp.157~184 (2009), John Benjamins
  22. Kwon, K., "The Small Clause in Russian: Structure and History", PhD, pp.2010
  23. Kwon, K., "Reanimating voices from the past: An alternative reading of Novgorod Birch Bark Letter №370", Russian Linguistics, (38), pp.305~326 (2016)
  24. Lehmann, W., "Proto-Indo-European Syntax" (1974), University of Texas Press
  25. Lipták, A., "Correlatives Crosslinguistically", pp.1~46 (2009), Benjamins
  26. Luján, E. R., "Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages", pp.221~236 (2009), John Benjamins
  27. Lunt, H. G., "Old Church Slavonic Grammar" (2001), Mouton de Gruyter
  28. Majer, M., "The origin of the ‘l-less perfect’ in the Novgorod birchbark documents", Russian Linguistics, (38), pp.167~185 (2014)
  29. Majer, M., "Russian kotóryj, Czech který, Slovene katę́ri: Vowel variation in the reflexes of Proto-Slavic *koterъ(jь) ‘which (of the two)’", Scando-Slavica, 61(2), pp.154~179 (2015)
  30. Minlos, P., "Slavic relative čto", co: between pronouns and conjunctions, 2012, pp.(1), 74~91
  31. Mitrenina, O. V., "The syntax of pseudo-correlative constructions with the pronoun kotoryj (‘which’) in Middle Russian", Slověne, (1), pp.61~73 (2012)
  32. Mitrović, M., "Configurational change in Indo-European coordinate construction", ms, pp.2015
  33. Moro, A., "Dynamic Antisymmetry: Movement as a Symmetry Breaking Phenomenon" (2000), MIT
  34. O’Neil, W., "Clause adjunction in Old English", General Linguistics, (17), pp.199~211 (1976)
  35. Pesetsky, D., "Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation", pp.262~294 (2007), Benjamins
  36. Potebnja, A. A., "Iz zapisok po russkoj grammatike, Vol. IV" (1941), AN SSSR
  37. Ron’ko, R. V., "Parametr nominativnogo ob”ekta i sintaksis infinitivnyx oborotov v dialektax russkogo Severa i v drevnerusskom jazyke", Vestnik MGGU im. M. A. Šoloxova, (1), pp.57~66 (2015)
  38. Schaeken, J., , pp.321~331 (2003), Indrik
  39. Strutevant, E. H., "Relatives in Indo-European and Hittite", Language Monograph(Curme volume of Linguistic Studies), (7), pp.141~149 (1930)
  40. Szemerényi, O. J. L., "Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft" (1980), Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft
  41. Timberlake, A., "The Nominative Object in Slavic, Baltic, and West Finnic" (1974), Verlag Otto Sagner
  42. de Vries, M., "The Syntax of Relativization", PhD, pp.2002
  43. Zaliznjak, A. A., "Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt" (2004), Jazyki slavjanskoj kul'tury
  44. Zaliznjak, A. A., "Berestjanye gramoty iz novgorodskix raskopok 2008 g", Voprosy jazykoznanija, (4), pp.3~12 (2008)
  45. Zaliznjak, A. A., "Berestjanye gramoty iz novgorodskix raskopok 2008 g", Voprosy jazykoznanija, (4), pp.3~16 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)