본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Analysis of Russian Interrogative Pronoun Čto Becoming Conjunction

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this paper was to systematically analyze the speech part transference process of čto and also the phenomenon of speech part hybridism which occurs during this process. Furthermore, the study, by analysis, aimed at clarifying the semantic, grammatic, and syntactic characteristics of čto which belongs to a pure category and čto which belong to a middle category. In addition, the study also aimed at establishing the fact that this phenomenon cannot avoid being continued in the language life and social life of language using groups because it is not a temporary mechanical phenomenon but something that has been carried out over a long period of time. The analysis results of the paper revealed that čto underwent a two stage speech part transference process involving interrogative pronoun→conjunction, or in other words, multiple grammaticalization, and that there exists many hybrid categories including, interrogative relative pronoun, relative pronoun, conjunction pronoun, and conjunction, each having their own inherent semantic and structural characteristics. The paper attempted to analyze čto, which has remained in the periphery of research.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to systematically analyze the speech part transference process of čto and also the phenomenon of speech part hybridism which occurs during this process. Furthermore, the study, by analysis, aimed at clarifying the semantic, grammatic, and syntactic characteristics of čto which belongs to a pure category and čto which belong to a middle category. In addition, the study also aimed at establishing the fact that this phenomenon cannot avoid being continued in the language life and social life of language using groups because it is not a temporary mechanical phenomenon but something that has been carried out over a long period of time. The analysis results of the paper revealed that čto underwent a two stage speech part transference process involving interrogative pronoun→conjunction, or in other words, multiple grammaticalization, and that there exists many hybrid categories including, interrogative relative pronoun, relative pronoun, conjunction pronoun, and conjunction, each having their own inherent semantic and structural characteristics. The paper attempted to analyze čto, which has remained in the periphery of research.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Ardentov, B. P., "Čto in Modern Russian Language" (1973), KGU
  2. Babajceba, V. V., "Place the Transient Phenomena in the Language System(on the Material of the Parts of Speech), In Transitional and Syncretism in Language and Speech", pp.5~20 (1991), Nauka
  3. Bußmann, H., "Lexicon Der Sprachwissenschaft" (1983), Alfred Kröoner Verlag
  4. Eom, S. C., "Analysis of the Word Class Transference Phenomenon of the Russian Interrogative Pronoun Čto", The Paper Collections of the Russian Association 2nd Joint Conference, pp.198~220 (2012)
  5. Fedorov, A. K., "The Meaning and Use of Subordinate Conjunctions “Čto” and “Čtoby” in Russian Modern Language", 박사, pp.1951
  6. Glagolevskij, P., "The Syntax of Russian Proverbs" (1874), Nauka
  7. Jur'evna, S. O., "Functional Homonyms, Combined with Homocomplex Čto", 박사, pp.2009
  8. Lee, S. H., "Understanding of Grammaticalization, Seoul : HanKook-MunHwaSa" (1998), HanKook-MunHwaSa
  9. "Library of M. Moshkov"[URL]
  10. Makarov, G. M., "On the Use of Relatively Unusual Form of a Pronoun Čto, In Communicative Syntactic and Stylistic Aspects of the Text Analysis", pp.75~80 (1980), URSS
  11. Padučeva, E. V, "Linguistics, In Great Encyclopedic Dictionary", pp.56~60 (2000), GRE
  12. Peškovskij, A. M, "Russian Syntax in a Scientific Light" (1938), National Educational and Pedagogical Publisher
  13. "Russian National Corpus"[URL]
  14. Šaxmatov, A. A., "Syntax of Russian Language" (2007), URSS
  15. Švedova, N., "Pronoun and Meaning" (1998), Azbukovnik
  16. Švedova, N., "The Brief Russian Grammar" (2002), The Publisher of RAS
  17. Švedova, N, "The Russian Grammar" (1960), Nauka
  18. Traugott, E, "The Semantics - Pragmatics of Grammaticalization Revisited", Approaches to Grammaticalization, 1(2) (1991), John Benjamins
  19. Traugott, E., "Regularity in Semantic Change" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  20. Ušakova, L. I, "Pronouns and Their Analogues", RLS, 1, pp.85~90 (1998)
  21. Vinogradov, V. V., "Russian Language Grammatical Teaching of the Word" (1972), Russian Language
  22. Yu, H. K, "The Research of Meaning ‘Into’ and ‘Within", rean Language, 276, pp.133~154 (2007)
  23. Zarecekij, A. I, "About Pronouns", RLS, 6, pp.16~22 (1940)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)