본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

의회와 FTA정책: 조지 W. 부시 행정부의 사례 (2001-06)

The Domestic Politics of U.S. trade policy: Bush Administration's Free Trade Agreements

홍대운
미국학연구소 (American Studies Institute)|2008.11|미국학 (American Studies)|제31권 제2호|pp. 327-362|DOI 10.18078/amstin.2008.31.2.012

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

자유무역협정CAFTA하원 세입위원회상원 재무위원회미-오만 FTAFTA: free trade agreementWays and Means CommitteeFinance CommitteeUS-Oman FTA
주제분류학제간연구

초록

George W. Bush administration has focused on bilateral and regional trade agreements, deviating from multilateral agreements which had been the main subject of U.S. trade policy. In trade agreements, U.S. President needs the approval of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate, in which the Ways and Means Committee of the House and the Finance Committee of the Senate have played a key role. The members of the two lead legislative bodies dealing with trade tend to be consistent in positions, generally independent of party leaders, when it comes to FTAs(free trade agreements). In the cases of CAFTA and U.S.-Oman FTA, however, many of those members voted inconsistently with other FTAs that were ratified during the Bush administration until 2006. This article examines the ratification results of FTAs during the George W. Bush administration until 2006, concluding that the difference between CAFTA, U.S.-Oman FTA and other FTAs resulted from political necessity, not from economic factors or political structural changes.

Abstract

George W. Bush administration has focused on bilateral and regional trade agreements, deviating from multilateral agreements which had been the main subject of U.S. trade policy. In trade agreements, U.S. President needs the approval of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate, in which the Ways and Means Committee of the House and the Finance Committee of the Senate have played a key role. The members of the two lead legislative bodies dealing with trade tend to be consistent in positions, generally independent of party leaders, when it comes to FTAs(free trade agreements). In the cases of CAFTA and U.S.-Oman FTA, however, many of those members voted inconsistently with other FTAs that were ratified during the Bush administration until 2006. This article examines the ratification results of FTAs during the George W. Bush administration until 2006, concluding that the difference between CAFTA, U.S.-Oman FTA and other FTAs resulted from political necessity, not from economic factors or political structural changes.

참고문헌 (68)

  1. 강인수, "국제통상론" (2006), 박영사
  2. 김민전, "美무역법안에 대한 지역별 의원투표 분석", 한국정치학회보, 30(1), pp.249~269 (1996)
  3. 김정수, "국제통상정책론" (2003), 박영사
  4. 김정수, "미국 통상정책의 정치경제학" (1996), 일신사
  5. 김창규, "국회의 통상 기능의 강화방안" (2000), 국회사무처
  6. 김홍율, "미국의 통상정책 결정 메커니즘과 한국에의 시사점" (2002), 대외경제 정책연구원
  7. 박성훈, "미국 통상정책 결정과정 및 결정요인", 경상논총, 35, pp.145~168 (2006)
  8. 박태호, "특집: 21세기 미국의 역사적 전망; 미국 대외 경제정책 변천", 미국학, 23, pp.85~125 (2000)
  9. 백창재, "미국 무역정책 결정요인에 관한 이론적 고찰 (제도와 행태를 중심으로)", 國際政治經濟硏究, 1(1), pp.151~170 (1997)
  10. 백창재, "북미자유무역협정 비준의 정치과정에 관한 연구", 國際地域硏究, 5(2), pp.43~68 (1996)
  11. 손병권, "부시(George W. Bush) 대통령의 정당편향적 의회전략: 유권자 성향과 개인적 리더쉽 스타일을 중심으로", 한국과 국제정치, 23(1), pp.33~65 (2007)
  12. 윤충원, "미국의 통상정책과 통상법" (2004), 집문당
  13. 정인교, "글로벌 시대의 FTA전략" (2005), 해남
  14. 이재득, "미국의 1990년대 대외경제정책 및 통상정책 메카니즘 고찰", 국제무역연구, 10(1)통권 : 1, pp.1~28 (2004)
  15. 이현우, "한국과 미국의 국회의원 표결요인 비교: 자유무역협정 비준의 경우", 국제정치논총, 45(3), pp.106~126 (2005)
  16. 임성호, "국가정체성의 강화와 정당 양극화:미국정치의 패러독스", 한국과 국제정치, 23(1), pp.1~32 (2007)
  17. 임재진, "미국 부시행정부의 통상정책에 관한 연구 : 행정부와 의회의 역학관계를 중심으로" (2003), 서울대학교 행정대학원
  18. 임혜란, "미국 부시행정부의 통상정책: 이념(Ideas)과 이해(Interests)의 역할", 한국과 국제정치, 49, pp.93~123 (2005)
  19. Charles K. Rowley, "Trade protection in the United States" (1995), Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd
  20. Carl Hulse, "Pelosi Rebuffed Over Her Choice for Majority Leader", The New York Times (2006)
  21. Catharine Rechert, "CQ Vote Studies--Party Unity:United We Stand Opposed", Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report (2008)
  22. "The Administration’s Proposal for Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China; Hearing before the committee on agriculture, House of Representatives, 2000.5.17/2008.11.10."[URL]
  23. "Congressional Record,The Library of Congress"[URL]
  24. "The Death and Life of the New Democrats; The Forum 6-2 (2008): Article 4"[URL]
  25. "Free Trade, Free Markets: Rating the 108th Congress; Cato Institute’s Center for Trade Policy Studies, Trade Policy Analysis 28(2005):1-48. (2008.11.10/2008.11.10."[URL]
  26. Daniel Trefler, "The Long and Short of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement", The American Economic Review, 94(4), pp.870~895 (2004)
  27. "Does Public Opinion Affect Trade Policy?; Business and Politics 10-2, Article 2. (2008) (2008.10.20"[URL]
  28. David Karol, "Divided Government and U.S. Trade Policy: Much Ado About Nothing?", International Organization, 54(4), pp.825~844 (2008)
  29. Edmund L. Andrews, "Small Trade Pact Becomes a Big Political Deal", The New York Times (2005)
  30. Edward Alden, "Big Sugar’ fights to maintain the status quo", The Financial Times (2004)
  31. Erik Gartzke, "Thinking globally or acting locally? Determinants of the GATT vote in Congress", Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23(1), pp.33~55 (1998)
  32. Gene M. Grossman, "The Politics of Free-Trade Agreements", American Economic Review, 85(4), pp.667~690 (1995)
  33. "Human Rights Watch, World Report 2008"[URL]
  34. "International Trade Commission, Top U.S. Export Markets; Free Trade Agreement and Country Fact Sheets, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2008"[URL]
  35. Jagdish Bhagwati, "Foes of free trade get afoot in the door", The Financial Times (2007)
  36. "James W. Ceaser and Daniel DiSalvo, ”Midterm Elections, Partisan Context, and Political Leadership: The 2006 Elections and Party Alignment,” The Forum 4-3 (2006): Article 11"[URL]
  37. James K. Jackson, "Trade Agreements: Impact on the U.S. Economy; CRS Report RL31932, Congressional Research Service", ~ (2007)
  38. James M.Lindsay, "Congress and the Politics of U.S.Foreign Policy" (1994), Johns Hopkins University Press
  39. James Traub, "Party Like It’s 1994", The New York Times Magazine (2006)
  40. Jamie L. Carson, "The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress; Working Paper", ~
  41. Jeffrey J.Schott, "Trade Relations Between Colombia and the United States" (2006), The Peterson Institute for International Economics
  42. "Pelosi Concentrates Power in the Office; The Politico, 2008"[URL]
  43. John E. Jackson, "Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes", American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), pp.805~823 (1992)
  44. John Gilbert, "CGE Simulation of US Bilateral Free Trade Agreements; background paper prepared for conference on Free Trade Agreements and US Trade Policy" (2003), Institute for International Economics
  45. John S. Odell, "Review: Understanding International Trade Policies: An Emerging Synthesis", World Politics, 43(1), pp.139~167 (1990)
  46. Joseph S. Nye Jr., "The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone" (2002), Oxford University Press
  47. Josephine Hearn, "Reverberations from CAFTA vote are still being felt on Hill; The Hill", ~ (2005)
  48. Judith Goldstein, "Ideas, Institutions, and American Trade Policy; International Organization", The State and American Foreign Economic Policy, 42(1), pp.179~217 (1988)
  49. Kenneth A. Wink, "Dispositions, constituencies, and cross-pressure: Modeling roll-call voting on the North America Free Trade Agreement in the U.S. House", Political Research Quarterly, 49, pp.749~770 (1996)
  50. Kerry A. Chase, "Economic Interests and Regional Trading Arrangements: The Case of NAFTA", International Organization, 57(1), pp.137~174 (2003)
  51. Mildred Amer, "Membership of the 110th Congress: A Profile; CRS Report RS22555, Congressional Research Service", ~ (2008)
  52. Richard E. Feinberg, "Regionalism and Domestic Politics: U.S.-Latin American Trade Policy in the Bush Era,”", Latin American Politics and Society, 44(4), pp.127~151 (2002)
  53. Robert H. Durr, "Explaining Congressional Approval", American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), pp.175~207 (1997)
  54. "U.S. Trade Agenda,” Statement Before the Senate Finance Committee, 2003.3.5"[URL]
  55. Robert D. Putnam, "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games", International Organization, 42, pp.427~460 (1988)
  56. Robin Toner, "After Many Years, It’s Rangel’s Turn at the Helm", The New York Times (2007)
  57. Stanley D. Nollen, "Free Trade, Fair Trade, Strategic Trade, and Protectionism. in the U.S. Congress, 1987·88", International Organization, 48, pp.491~525 (1994)
  58. "Assessing Nancy Pelosi; The Forum 6-3 (2008): Article 5"[URL]
  59. "Remarks at Launch of U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement Washington DC, 2006.2.2"[URL]
  60. Scott Crichlow, "Legislators’ Personality Traits and Congressional Support for Free Trade", The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(5), pp.693~711 (2002)
  61. Thomas Stratmann, "Congressional Voting over Legislative Careers: Shifting Positions and Changing Constraints", The American Political Science Review, 94(3), pp.665~676 (2000)
  62. Timothy Besley, "Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, and Yardstick Competition", The American Economic Review, 85(1), pp.25~45 (1995)
  63. "S. Department of State, Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, Trafficking in Persons Report 2008"[URL]
  64. "USTR(United States Trade Representative),"Dominican Republic Joins Five Central American Countries in Historic FTA with U.S.,"Press Release,2004.8.5.(2008.10.19"[URL]
  65. Walter J.Oleszek, "Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process" (2004), CQ Press
  66. "Fact Sheet: President Bush Signs Letter to Send the United States-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementing Legislation to Congress; Press Release, 2008.4.7, 2008.11.9"[URL]
  67. William Avery, "Domestic Interests in NAFTA Bargaining", Political Science Quarterly, 113(2), pp.281~305 (1998)
  68. "The Politics of Constraint: House Republicans in Retrospect and Prospect; The Forum 6-3 (2008): Article 2,2008.10.17"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

미국 하원 FTA 표결과 대통령 외교정책: 미국-모로코, 미국-바레인, 미국-오만 FTA 사례를 중심으로최민진미국학연구소 · 미국학2019 · 제42권 제1호미국 통상정책과 하원 '세입위원회'의 역할 변화: 무역촉진권한의 연장과 소멸을 중심으로조현구세종연구소 · 국가전략2010 · 제16권 제3호미 의회의 신속처리절차(Fast-Track Procedure)에 대한 고찰김동훈한국세계지역학회 · 세계지역연구논총2009 · 제27권 제3호대외정책결정의 견제자로서의 의회: 자유무역협정(FTA) 체결과정에서 미국 의회의 역할을 중심으로유성진분쟁해결연구센터 · 분쟁해결연구2012 · 제10권 제1호미국 부시행정부의 통상정책: 이념(Ideas)과 이해(Interests)의 역할임혜란극동문제연구소 · 한국과 국제정치2005 · 제21권 제2호통상외교와 국회의 역할: 한-칠레FTA와 한미FTA의 사례유현석한국정치외교사학회 · 한국정치외교사논총2008 · 제29권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

미국의 대학교육: 과거와 현재 1636-2008김성복pp. 3-27한국대학 발전궤적에 나타난 미국대학: 서울대의 경우우용제, 김기석pp. 29-52미국 중등교육의 개혁과 쟁점박세훈pp. 53-87미국의 의학교육박주현pp. 89-116미국의 법학교육: 과거, 현재, 그리고 미래이재협pp. 117-140
원문 보기