본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Common Sense and Economic Knowledge: Marx versus Keynes

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류사회과학일반

초록

This paper attempts to assign proper places to common sense and scientific knowledge in Marx’ and Keynes’systems. Marx conceives common sense both as the starting‐point and as the end‐point of knowledge. For him, scientific investigation starts from common sense, constructs basic categories, and ends up with forging links between the categories and common sense notions. As a result, common sense is reconstructed and subsumed as part of either knowledge or ideology. In Keynes’works, common sense is not entirely subsumed as part of theory or ideology. On his view, common sense, due to its autonomy, serves as checks on economic theory as regards its questions and its implications. Despite these differences, Marx and Keynes share the view that economic theory is neither disembedded from, nor conflated with, common sense and that cognition on the part of theorists and consciousness of agents are interlinked but layered, as illustrated in their concepts of value forms and convention. By these commonalities, Marx’ and Keynes’positions are distinguished from analytic philosophy and from Friedman’ ‘s if’methodology in particular.

Abstract

This paper attempts to assign proper places to common sense and scientific knowledge in Marx’ and Keynes’systems. Marx conceives common sense both as the starting‐point and as the end‐point of knowledge. For him, scientific investigation starts from common sense, constructs basic categories, and ends up with forging links between the categories and common sense notions. As a result, common sense is reconstructed and subsumed as part of either knowledge or ideology. In Keynes’works, common sense is not entirely subsumed as part of theory or ideology. On his view, common sense, due to its autonomy, serves as checks on economic theory as regards its questions and its implications. Despite these differences, Marx and Keynes share the view that economic theory is neither disembedded from, nor conflated with, common sense and that cognition on the part of theorists and consciousness of agents are interlinked but layered, as illustrated in their concepts of value forms and convention. By these commonalities, Marx’ and Keynes’positions are distinguished from analytic philosophy and from Friedman’ ‘s if’methodology in particular.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Coates, J, "The Claims of Common Sense" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  2. Davis, J. B, "The locus of Keynes’s philosophical thinking in the General Theory: the concept of convention in Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought Vol. X" (1994), Edward Elgar
  3. Davis, J. B, "J. M. Keynes on History and Convention, A ‘Second Edition’ of The General Theory, Vol. 2", pp.203~221 (1997), Routledge
  4. Davis, J, B, "Common sense: a middle way between formalism and post-structuralism", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, pp.503~515 (1999)
  5. Dupuy, J. P, "L’auto-référence dans la théorie keynésienne de la speculation", Cahiers d’Economie Politique, 14(5), pp.229~242 (1988)
  6. Friedman, M, "The methodology of positive economics, reprinted in Readings in Microeconomics" (1968), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  7. Grave, S. A, "Common sense, Encyclopedia of Philosophy vol. 2" (1963), Macmillan
  8. Hayek, F. A, "Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics" (1967), Routledge & Kegan Paul
  9. Hayek, F. A, "Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. II" (1976), The University of Chicago Press
  10. Hodgson, G. M, "Economics and Institutions" (1988), University of Pennsylvania Press
  11. Hong, H, "Marx and Menger on value: as many similarities as differences", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24, pp.87~105 (2000)
  12. Hong, H, "Marx’s value forms and Hayek’s rules: a reinterpretation in the light of the dichotomy between physis and nomos", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(5), pp.613~635 (2002)
  13. Keynes, J. M, "Essays in Biography" (1933), The Norton Library
  14. Keynes, J. M, "My early beliefs in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. X", pp.433~451 (1972), Macmillan
  15. Keynes, J. M, "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money" (1936), Macmillan
  16. Keynes, J. M, "The general theory of unemployment in Quarterly Journal ofEconomics", pp.109~123 (1937), Macmillan
  17. Keynes, J. M, "means to prosperity, Essays in Persuasion Vol. IX", pp.335~366 (1972), Macmillan
  18. Kultgen, J, "The Vicissitudes of Common-Sense Virtue Ethics, Part I: From Aristotle to Slote", The Journal of Value Inquiry, 32, pp.325~341 (1998)
  19. Langlois, R. N, "Rationality, institutions, and explanation, Economics as a process" (1986), Cambridge University Press
  20. Langlois, R. N, "Optimization, rule‐following, and the methodology of situational analysis, Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology" (1993), Routledge
  21. Lewis, D. K, "Convention" (1968), Harvard University Press
  22. Marx, K, "Capital, Vol. I" (1967), International Publishers
  23. Marx, K, "Theories of Surplus Value" (1968), Progress Publishers
  24. Reid, T, "Reid’s Essays on The Intellectual Powers of Man" (1941), MacMillan
  25. Shiller, R. J, "Expectations, The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics Vol. 2." (1987), Macmillan
  26. Vromen, J. J, "Economic Evolution" (1995), Routledge
  27. Wicksteed, P. H, "dimensions of economic quantities in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of economics, Vol. 1", pp.844~845 (1988), Macmillan

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)