사료 접종 방법에 의한 in vitro 반추위 발효 상성 변화
Rumen Fermentation was Changed by Feed Inoculation Method in In Vitro
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
생물학적 평가 방법 중 in situ와 in vitro 평가 방법은 비용 및 시간을 절약할 수 있으며 동물 복지 측면에서 제약이 적어 주목되고 있는 방법이다. In vitro 실험에서 사용되는 사료 접종법으로 배양병에 직접 사료를 담는dispersion 방법은 실제 반추위 발효 상황에 근접한 조건에서 실험할 수 있는 장점이 있지만, 시간과 노동력이 많이 소모된다. 반대로 사료 주머니를 이용한 방법은 실험 수행의 편이성이 있지만 첨가제 실험 수행의 제약이 있으며, 미생물 활성과 섬유소 소화율이 저하되는 단점이 있다. 본 실험은 dispersion 방법과 사료 주머니 방법을 조합하여 보다 편리한 방법으로 dispersion에 가까운 높은 재현성의 발효 성상과 소화율 평가 가능할 것이라고 생각하여 in vitro 발효 성상과 미생물 조성을 비교하였다. Dispersion 방법과 nylon bag을 조합한 실험에서 건물 소화율은 세척 과정에서 미생물 및 사료 입자의 유실로 과대평가될 수 있지만 이론적 최대 가스 발생량 Vmax,가스 발생량에 대한 분해 속도 상수 Kg에서 유의적 차이가 나타나지 않으며, IVNDFD, pH, NH3-N, total VFA발생량 그리고 VFA 조성에서도 유의적 차이가 나지 않았다. Real-time PCR을 이용한 미생물 조성 분석에서는 general bacteria의 절대량에서 유의적 차이가 나지 않았다. 상기의 결과를 종합해 볼 때, in vitro 실험에서 사료 주머니의 사용은 충분히 적용가능하며 일반적인 방법인 dispersion과 비교해 볼 때, 영양소 이용에 있어 반추미생물의 사료 접촉을 방해하지 않을 것으로 생각된다. 하지만 in vitro bach culture 방법은 배양조건에서 제약이 있어, 향후 연속배양 방법과 in situ의 실험을 통해 본 실험의 실험결과에 대한 추가적인 규명이 필요할 것으로 사료된다.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different feed inoculation method on rumen fermentation in an in vitro. Three experimental treatments were used: control (CON, direct dispersion of feed (2 g) in rumen fluid), combinations of direct dispersion (1 g) and nylon bag (DNB, pore size: 50 μm, 1 g), and nylon bag (NB, 2 g). An in vitro fermentation experiment was carried out using strained rumen fluid for 48 h incubation time and timothy was used as a substrate. At the end of the incubation, in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility (IVNDFD), pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), and microbial community were evaluated and gas production was estimated at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 h incubation periods. Gas production was higher in CON than DNB and NB at 6 and 12 h incubation time (p<0.01). There were no differences in final gas production, pH, NH3-N concentration, total VFA production, and VFA profiles among treatments. The IVDMD was lowest in CON (p<0.01) but the IVNDFD was not differed by feed distribution methods. There were no significant differences in general bacteria and fungi. Protozoa count was highest in NB treatment among treatments (p<0.01). The abundance of cellulolytic bacteria, Ruminococcus flavefaciens and Fibrobacter succinogenes, was highest in the CON among treatments (p<0.01).
참고문헌 (28)
- AOAC, "Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International", Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, ~ (2005)
- Chaney, A. L., "Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia", Clinical chemistry, 8, pp.130~132 (1962)
- Denman, S. E., "Development of a real‐time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen", FEMS microbiology ecology, 58, pp.572~582 (2006)
- Erwin, E., "Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography", J Dairy Sci, 44, pp.1768~1771 (1961)
- Ellis, W. C., "Methodology for estimating digestion and passage kinetics of forages", Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization, (foragequalityev), 682~756 (1994)
- Firkins, J., "Ruminal nitrogen metabolism: perspectives for integration of microbiology and nutrition for dairy1, 2", J. Dairy Sci, 90, pp.1~16 (2007)
- Getachew, G., "In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review", J. Anim. Sci. Technol, 72(3-4), pp.261~281 (1998)
- Goering, H., "Forage Fiber Analyses:(apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications)", Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, ~ (1979)
- Ha, J., "Ruminant nutrition and physiology" (2005), Seoul National University press
- 기광석, "Evaluation of the nutritional value of locally produced forage in Korea using chemical analysis and in vitro ruminal fermentation", Animal Bioscience, 30(3), pp.355~362 (2017), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- Krizsan, S., "Comparison of some aspects of the in situ and in vitro methods in evaluation of neutral detergent fiber digestion", J. Anim. Sci, 91, pp.838~847 (2013)
- Lee, C., "Absolute and relative QPCR quantification of plasmid copy number in Escherichia coli", J. Biotechnol, 123, pp.273~280 (2006)
- Lindberg, J. E., "Effect of bag pore size on the loss of particulate matter and on the degradation of cell wall fibre", Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences (JAES), 6(2-3), pp.171~182 (1981)
- NRC, "Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle" (2001), National Academic Press
- Raffrenato, E., "Development of an in vitro method to determine rumen undigested aNDFom for use in feed evaluation", J. Dairy Sci, 101(11), pp.9888~9900 (2018)
- Russell, J. B., "Microbial rumen fermentation", J. Dairy Sci, 64(6), pp.1153~1169 (1981)
- Russell, J. B., "Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?", J. Dairy Sci, 79, pp.1503~1509 (1996)
- Schofield, P., "Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production", J. Anim. Sci, 72, pp.2980~2991 (1994)
- Sommart, K., "Fermentation characteristics and microbial protein synthesis in an in vitro system using cassava, rice straw and dried ruzi grass as substrates", Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci, 13(8), pp.1084~1093 (2000)
- Sylvester, J. T., "Development of an assay to quantify rumen ciliate protozoal biomass in cows using real-time PCR", Nutr. J, 134, pp.3378~3384 (2004)
- Tagliapietra, F., "True dry matter digestibility of feeds evaluated in situ with different bags and in vitro using rumen fluid collected from intact donor cows", Anim. Prod. Sci, 52, pp.338~346 (2012)
- Theodorou, M. K., "A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds", J. Anim. Sci. Technol, 48, pp.185~197 (1994)
- Tilley, J., "A two‐stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops", Grass Forage Sci, 18, pp.104~111 (1963)
- Valente, T. N. P., "Recent advances in evaluation of bags made from different textiles used in situ ruminal degradation", Can. J. Anim. Sci, 95, pp.493~498 (2015)
- Van Soest, Pv., "Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition", J. Dairy Sci, 74, pp.3583~3597 (1991)
- Vogel, K. P., "Evaluation of a filter bag system for NDF, ADF, and IVDMD forage analysis", J. Crop. Sci, 39(1), pp.276~279 (1999)
- Wilman, D., "A comparison of filter bag methods with conventional tube methods of determining the in vitro digestibility of forages", J. Anim. Sci. Technol, 84, pp.33~47 (2000)
- Wang, R. F., "PCR detection of Ruminococcus spp. in human and animal faecal samples", Mol. Cell Probes, 11, pp.259~265 (1997)