본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

PSI와 한국안보: 분석과 제안

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정치외교학

초록

WMD 확산 방지가 국제사회의 최대 안보위협이라는 점과 이 문제의 중심에 북한이 자리하고 있다는 것은 PSI가 남북문제와 국제문제의 교차점에 위치하면서 한국의 핵심적인 통일·외교·안보문제로 등장했다는 사실을 뜻한다. 본 논문은 PSI를 역사적, 이론적 관점에서 심층적으로 분석하고 우리 정부의 대응책을 제시했다. PSI는 행정부의 교체에도 불구하고 지속적으로 발전되고 있는 미국의 내구력 있는 외교안보전략수단이다. 이제 한국에서도 PSI에 대한 오해와 편견을 해소하고 한국의 안전을 확보함과 동시에 핵확산 방지라는 국제사회 공동의 목표에도 부응할 수 있는 정교한 정책을 마련해야 한다. 본 논문은 PSI 정책의 기조로 북한의 행위를 기준으로 사안별로 대응하는 ‘분리접근’과 전면참가를 원칙으로 하되 대상국별로 참여수위를 조절하는 ‘조절된 접근’ 두 가지를 제시했다.

Abstract

The fact that North Korea is at the center of WMD proliferation which is the number one security threat to the international community indicates that the PSI is an international issue as well as a critical concern for South Korea. This article conducts an in-depth analysis of the PSI from the theoretical and historical perspectives, and proposes policy options for the ROK government. The PSI is a durable strategic tool of the United States, being continuously developed by the various U.S. administrations. South Korea needs to remove misunderstandings and prejudices regarding PSI, and develop better policy options that can meet the international demand of WMD non-proliferation as well as assure its national security. The article proposes two policy directions of separate approach and managed access. According to separate approach, the ROK reaction will depend on the DPRK behavior, rewarding for the good and sanctioning for the wrong or dangerous. With managed access, Seoul will hold on to the principle of full participation to the PSI activities, and differentiate the level of commitment depending on the target nation. For North Korea, its level of participation will be moderated in order not to stir up the North, while it will guarantee full participation in case of a third country.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 전성훈, "부시 행정부의 북핵정책 변화 분석" (2007), 통일연구원
  2. 전성훈, ""확산방지구상"(PSI)과 한국의 대응" (2007), 통일연구원
  3. Byman, Daniel, "The Dynamics of Coercion: American Foreign Policy and the Limits of Military Might" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  4. Daniel, Donald, "Coercive Inducement and the Containment of International Crisis" (1999), United Institute of Peace
  5. Gaddis, John Lewis, "Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy during the Cold War" (2005), Oxford University Press
  6. Office of the Deputy Secretary of Defense, "Report on Nonproliferation and Counterproliferation Activities and Programs", pp.1~ (1994), The Department of Defense
  7. "National Strategy for Combating Terrorism"[URL]
  8. "National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction"[URL]
  9. "The National Security Strategy of the United States of America"[URL]
  10. 박창권, "대량살상무기 확산방지구상(PSI)과 북한", 국방정책연구 (2006), 국방연구원
  11. 신성호, ""확산안보구상(PSI)과 한반도" (2005), 동아시아연구원
  12. Armitage,Richard, "A comprehensive approach to North Korea", Strategic Forum, (159) (1999)
  13. Cheon,Seongwhun, "North Korea and the ROK-U.S. security alliance", Armed Forces and Society, pp.5~28 (2007)
  14. Chestnut,Sheena, "Illicit activity and proliferation", International Security, pp.80~111 (2007)
  15. Cotton, James, "The proliferation security initiative and North Korea: legality and limitations of a coalition strategy", Security Dialogue, pp.193~211 (2005)
  16. Gaddis, John Lewis, "Grand strategy in the second term", Foreign Affairs, pp.2~15 (2005)
  17. Muller, Harald, "Counterproliferation: putting new wine in old bottles", Washington Quarterly, pp.143~154 (1995)
  18. Pilat, Joseph, "The technological promise of counterproliferation", Washington Quarterly, pp.153~166 (1995)
  19. Wit,Joel, "Seven lessons for dealing with today’s North Korea nuclear crisis", Arms Control Today, pp.19~22 (2004)
  20. Alterman,Jon, "Coercive diplomacy against Iraq,1990-98,The United States and Coercive Diplomacy" (2003), United States Institute of Peace
  21. Art,Robert, "Introduction, The United States and Coercive Diplomacy" (2003), United States Institute of Peace
  22. "동아일보. 2006년 1월 25일", ~ (2006)
  23. "문화일보. 2008년 4월 14일", ~ (2008)
  24. "연합뉴스. 2006년 10월 30일", ~ (2006)
  25. Bolton,John, "An all-out war on proliferation", Financial Times, 7 (2004)
  26. Gordon,Michael, "U.S. readies plan to raise pressure on North Koreans", New York Times (2002)
  27. Havel,Vaclav, "Time to act on N. Korea", Washington Post, pp.A29~ (2004)
  28. Kessler,Gleen, "U.S. has a shifting script on N. Korea", Washington Post, pp.A25~ (2003)
  29. Perry,William, "It’s either nukes or negotiation", Washington Post, pp.A23~ (2004)
  30. Powell, Bill, "The Sopranos state", Time, pp.19~22 (2007)
  31. Sanger,David, "Bush appears to back down on arms claim against Iraq", New York Times (2004)
  32. "PSI 정식가입 않기로…목적·원칙은 지지"[URL]
  33. "Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, U.S. Department of State, Committee on International Relations, United States House of Representatives"[URL]
  34. International Atomic Energy Agency, "Illicit Trafficking and Other Unauthorized Activities Involving Nuclear and Radioactive Materials", pp.4~6 (2005)
  35. "Statement of the Security Council at the Level of Heads of States and Government. S/23500"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)