한·중 품사전성 대비 고찰 -영변화 파생어와 겸류현상을 중심으로-
A comparative study of the phenomenon of word conversion in Korean and Chinese A comparative study of the phenomenon of word conversion in Korean and Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we investigate conversion words in Korean and Chinese. Conversion words are those that have two or more grammatical functions depending on their context while retaining a related meaning. In Korean, which is an agglutinative language, the majority of words have only one grammatical function and their word class can only be changed by adding particular suffixes. However few words have more than one word class or have different grammatical functions in the different sentences, this small group is called "zero-derived conversion". On the other hand, in Chinese, which is an isolating language, one word often holds two or more classes at the same time and the word class is defined by the word order of a particular sentience. In chapter 2 we address the definition of conversion words and introduce an approach for determining the difference between homophones and conversion words. Conversion words don't change form or pronunciation when they are used as a different word class and their meaning does not change significantly. If the meaning is not related it is a homophone, not a conversion word. In chapter 3 we analyse some examples of conversion words in Korean and Chinese and compare them based on part of speech classifications; noun, verb, adjective and adverb.
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate conversion words in Korean and Chinese. Conversion words are those that have two or more grammatical functions depending on their context while retaining a related meaning. In Korean, which is an agglutinative language, the majority of words have only one grammatical function and their word class can only be changed by adding particular suffixes. However few words have more than one word class or have different grammatical functions in the different sentences, this small group is called "zero-derived conversion". On the other hand, in Chinese, which is an isolating language, one word often holds two or more classes at the same time and the word class is defined by the word order of a particular sentience. In chapter 2 we address the definition of conversion words and introduce an approach for determining the difference between homophones and conversion words. Conversion words don't change form or pronunciation when they are used as a different word class and their meaning does not change significantly. If the meaning is not related it is a homophone, not a conversion word. In chapter 3 we analyse some examples of conversion words in Korean and Chinese and compare them based on part of speech classifications; noun, verb, adjective and adverb.
참고문헌 (36)
- 이기문, "동아 새국어사전" (1996), 동아출판사
- 高大民族文化研究所, "现代中韩词典" (1997)
- 北京大学中文系现代汉语教研室, "现代汉语(重排本)" (2007), 商务印书馆
- 북경대학 중문과 현대한어 연구실, "현대중국어의 이해" (2007), 차이나 하우스
- 陆俭名, "现代汉语语法研究教程(第三版)" (2005), 北京大学出版社
- 陆俭名, "중국어 어법 방법론" (2007), 차이나 하우스
- 胡裕树, "现代汉语(第6版)" (1995), 上海教育出版社
- 송철의, "국어의 파생어형성 연구" (1992), 태학사
- 심재기, "국어어휘론" (1982), 집문당
- 장윤철, "테마로 배우는 현대 중국 언어학 개론" (2008), 소통
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1991), 정음문화사
- 홍기문, "조선문법 연구" (1947), 서울신문사
- 김정은, "현대 국어의 단어 형성법 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.1994
- 김현아, "현행 고등중국어교과서 품사의 겸류현상 및 구분방법", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2001
- 이흥식, "현대 국어의 영접어 파생에 대한 고찰", 한국언어문학, 37 (1997)
- 조경화, "계열관계 중심의 고등학교 중국어 어휘 지도 방안", 석사, 중국어 교육, pp.2005
- 조아라, "현대 한어 명동사의 겸류사 연구", 석사, pp.2003
- 최소영, "효율적인 개사 교육을 위한 지도 방안 연구 :고등학교 《중국어Ⅰ》 교과서를 중심으로", 석사, 중국어교육, pp.2007
- 하치근, "파생법에서 어휘화한 단어의 처리문제", 우리말 연구, 2 (1992)
- 安华林, "从两种词表看名、动、形兼类的处理", 语言教学与研究, 4 (2005)
- 陈一, "动名兼类词与n的v／n 结构", 求是学刊, 1 (1998)
- 翟淑英, "谈现代汉语中词的兼类问题", 内蒙古大学学报 (2006)
- 范虹艳, "小议词的兼类与其在词典中的正确反映形式", 南昌高专学报 (2008)
- 郑丽, "试论词类问题中的"活用"和"兼类", 渭南师范学院, 13 (2005)
- 古晓君, "语文辞书兼类词和多义词释义中不宜出现原词", 南昌大学学报, 5 (2006)
- 胡安顺, "名词动用与兼类词的界限", 语言教学与研究, 5 (2006)
- 陆俭明, "关于词的兼类问题", 中国语文, 1(32) (1994)
- 林升华, "名词活用作动词及动名词兼类辩西", 经济与社会发展 (2006)
- 马前, "现代汉语兼类词判定初析", 辽东学院学报, 8(48) (2006), 河北大学人文学院
- 朴重奎, "動名詞和兼類詞的區別特征", 중국인문과학, 26, pp.7~146 (2003), 중국인문학회
- 邵百鸣, "动名兼类和动词名用的区别", 江西科技师范学院学报, 1 (2005)
- 孙艳, "谈现代汉语新的兼类现象", 联城师范学院学报, 4 (2000)
- 秦礼君, "汉语兼类词与日语词类转化", 军事经济学院学报, 3(1) (1996)
- 王文, "形容词能否带宾语", 中州大学学报 (1999)
- 温锁林, "汉语名、动、形兼类词的两种鉴别方法", 语文研究, 1통권 : 66 (1998)
- 张全生, "确定形动兼类词的标准刍议", 语言与翻译, 4통권 : 72 (2002)