단어 형성에 관한 대조 연구
A Comparative Study of Word Formation
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper concerns of word formation in Korean language as a comparative view. I examine the process of word formation in Chinese, Japanese, Turkish and Korean. It contrasts Korean and foreign language on compounds and derivations to approach more objectively in linguistic point of view. This paper determines the criteria for the study about compounds on Vietnamese and Chinese to the internal expansion, semantic discrimination and stress. On the other hand, it focuses on the discussion of the derivation, mainly about the characteristics of Japanese and Turkish. It is able to divide into the independent type and bond type. It is obvious that the suffix decides a part of speech and this is simultaneously capable of adding new meanings to stem. In other words, the suffix could play a main role of the grammatical and semantic section of the derivative. To sum up, I compared a word formation in foreign language, examined correlation with the composition of Chinese and Vietnamese and the derivation of Turkish and Japanese. For the comparison of them with Korean, I examine the process of word formation in Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese and Turkish. Further discussion is needed to understand of morphological features of Korean. It is necessary to study about a bilingual education for foreign language learners as well. It is also quite important to make a basement of the fused form and idiomatic expression on a contrastive views.
Abstract
This paper concerns of word formation in Korean language as a comparative view. I examine the process of word formation in Chinese, Japanese, Turkish and Korean. It contrasts Korean and foreign language on compounds and derivations to approach more objectively in linguistic point of view. This paper determines the criteria for the study about compounds on Vietnamese and Chinese to the internal expansion, semantic discrimination and stress. On the other hand, it focuses on the discussion of the derivation, mainly about the characteristics of Japanese and Turkish. It is able to divide into the independent type and bond type. It is obvious that the suffix decides a part of speech and this is simultaneously capable of adding new meanings to stem. In other words, the suffix could play a main role of the grammatical and semantic section of the derivative. To sum up, I compared a word formation in foreign language, examined correlation with the composition of Chinese and Vietnamese and the derivation of Turkish and Japanese. For the comparison of them with Korean, I examine the process of word formation in Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese and Turkish. Further discussion is needed to understand of morphological features of Korean. It is necessary to study about a bilingual education for foreign language learners as well. It is also quite important to make a basement of the fused form and idiomatic expression on a contrastive views.
참고문헌 (51)
- 고영근, "국어 접미사의 연구" (1974), 광문사
- 김석득, "국어구조론" (1971), 연대출판부
- 김광해, "어휘 연구의 방향 in: 국어학의 새로운 인식과 전개" (1991), 민음사
- 김기태, "간추린 베트남어 문법" (2002), 삼지사
- 김제열, "‘하다’ 구문의 연구", 석사, pp.1999
- 김지환, "현대 한(韓), 월(越)한자음의 비교 및 대조", 언어연구, 17, pp.1~26 (1998), 언어연구회
- 김희경, "The Fused Form of Korean Languages as a Comparative Study", 한국어문학연구, 22, pp.83~99 (2005), 한국어문학연구회
- 김희경, "관용어구의 대조언어학적 연구", 한말연구, (18), pp.95~128 (2006), 한말연구학회
- 김희경, "A Contrastive Study of Idiomatic Expression", 松山大學論集, 18(4), pp.183~199 (2006)
- 유장옥, "일본어 복합 동사의 유형 분류", 어문학연구, 6, pp.151~241 (1993), 인문과학연구소
- 서정수, "동사 ‘하－’의 문법" (1975), 형설출판사
- 송철의, "파생어 형성에 있어서의 어기의 의미와 파생어의 의미", 진단학보, 60, pp.193~211 (1985), 진단학회
- 송철의, "국어의 파생어 형성 연구" (1992), 태학사
- 송철의, "국어의 파생어 형성 연구", 박사, pp.1990
- 심재기, "국어어휘론" (1981), 집문당
- 안경환, "한국어 어순과 베트남의 비교", 박사, pp.1996
- 안경환, "Tư ghép song song trong tiếng hàn-việt", 베트남연구, 3, pp.373~397 (2002), 한국베트남학회
- 육태화, "국어 합성명사 연구", 박사, pp.1995
- 이광호, "동사어간 ‘하－’의 음운현상", 어문학논총, 4, pp.99~116 (1985), 국민대 어문학연구소
- 이석주, "합성어의 단일화 현상", 국어교육, 104, pp.143~165 (2001), 한국어교육학회
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 이지선, "한국어 합성어와 베트남어 합성어의 형태 의미 구조 비교 연구", 박사, pp.2006
- 정 광, "‘하－’동사 활용의 음운론적 해석 in: 국어학신연구" (1986), 탑출판사
- 조명숙, "한국 한자어와 베트남어 한자어 비교 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 한정한, "‘하－’의 조응적 특성과 통사 정보", 국어학, 23, pp.215~238 (1993), 국어학회
- 하치근, "국어 파생 형태론" (1989), 남명문화사
- 홍사만, "국어어휘의미연구" (1985), 학문사
- 홍사만, "국어의미론연구" (1994), 형설출판사
- 황찬호, "한·일어 대조 분석" (1998), 명지출판사
- Bybee,J.L, "A View of Phonology from a Cognitive and Functionalist Perspective", Cognitive Linguistics, 5 (1994)
- Bybee,J.L, "Phonology and Language Use" (2001), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Cruse,D.A, "Lexical Semantics" (1986), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Geoffry,L, "Turkish Grammar" (2000), Oxford Univ. Press
- Geoffrey,S, "Writing System" (1985), Stanford Univ. Press
- Güven,D, "터키어와 한국어의 파생 접미사 비교 연구", 석사, 국문과, pp.1996
- Lưu,T.A, "한국어와 베트남어 조어법 대조 분석", 석사, 국문과, pp.1997
- Martin,S.E, "Lexical Evidence Relating Korean to Japanese", Language, 42 (1966)
- Nguyễn,T.C, "Ngữ Pháp Tiếng Việt", NXB khoa học xã hội., ~ (1981)
- Nguyễn,V.T, "Từ và vốn từ Tiếng Việt hiện đại", NXB đại học và trung học chuyân nghiệp., ~ (1976)
- Robert,F, "Current Issues in Comparative Grammar in Studies in Natural Language & Linguistics Theory" (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- 時枝誠記, "日本文法" (1950), 岩波書店
- 橋本進吉, "國語法硏究" (1948), 岩波書店
- 松下大三郞, "改馔標準日本文法" (1978), 勉誠社
- 山田孝雄, "日本文法學槪論" (1936), 実文館
- 김영규, "베한영 알파 사전" (1997), 조명문화사
- 서재만, "Türkçe-Korece Sözlüğü" (1991), 한국외국어대 출판부
- 조재현, "베한사전" (2000), 한국외국어대 출판부
- 최한우, "Korece-Türkçe-Ingilize Sözlük(Korean-Turkish-English Dictionary)" (2000), 펴내기
- Oxford Univ., "Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary" (1992), Oxford Univ. Press
- Oxford Univ., "Anh-Việt(English Vietnamese Dictionary)" (1994), Oxford Univ. Press
- RedHouse, "Elesözlüğü Türkçe-Ingilize" (1975), Redhouse Yayinevi