韩汉语言接触2,200年
Language Contact between Korean and Chinese for 2, 200 Years
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article deals with the following topics:a. The transmission time of Chinese characters to old Korea b. The transmission routes of Chinese characters to old Korea c. Language contacts between Korean and Old Chinese, Middle Chinese, Old Mandarin and Modern Mandarin It claims that Chinese characters were first transmitted to old Koreans at latest by the second century B.C. during the Weiman Choson period. This is a century earlier than the conventional view, which considers the first century B.C. as the time of transmission because of the four commanderies that were founded by the Han dynasty during that time. Concerning the routes of transmission, this article follows the conventional views, which can be summarized as Koguryo borrowed Chinese characters from northern China, while Paekche did from southeastern China. Silla accepted Chinese characters from Koguryo. This article presents some examples of language contact between Korean and Old Chinese in (2)‐(5), Korean and Middle Chinese in (6), Korean and Old Mandarin in (8)‐(9), and Korean and Modern Mandarin in (13). Based upon these examples, the author claims that Sino‐Korean and/or Korean have been in close contact with Chinese from the earliest time to the present. This view is different from that from some Korean linguists who claim that Sino‐Korean has been somewhat fossilized since their pronunciations were established sometime in the past. It is true that Sino‐Korean has experienced less change than the native Korean. However, it does not sound plausible to claim that Sino‐Korean is a dead component that was fossilized in the Korean language.
Abstract
This article deals with the following topics:a. The transmission time of Chinese characters to old Korea b. The transmission routes of Chinese characters to old Korea c. Language contacts between Korean and Old Chinese, Middle Chinese, Old Mandarin and Modern Mandarin It claims that Chinese characters were first transmitted to old Koreans at latest by the second century B.C. during the Weiman Choson period. This is a century earlier than the conventional view, which considers the first century B.C. as the time of transmission because of the four commanderies that were founded by the Han dynasty during that time. Concerning the routes of transmission, this article follows the conventional views, which can be summarized as Koguryo borrowed Chinese characters from northern China, while Paekche did from southeastern China. Silla accepted Chinese characters from Koguryo. This article presents some examples of language contact between Korean and Old Chinese in (2)‐(5), Korean and Middle Chinese in (6), Korean and Old Mandarin in (8)‐(9), and Korean and Modern Mandarin in (13). Based upon these examples, the author claims that Sino‐Korean and/or Korean have been in close contact with Chinese from the earliest time to the present. This view is different from that from some Korean linguists who claim that Sino‐Korean has been somewhat fossilized since their pronunciations were established sometime in the past. It is true that Sino‐Korean has experienced less change than the native Korean. However, it does not sound plausible to claim that Sino‐Korean is a dead component that was fossilized in the Korean language.
참고문헌 (28)
- 崔玲爱, "从中国古代音韵学的角度看韩语的语源问题", 东方学志, 67, pp.309~340 (1990)
- 李敦柱, "汉字音韵学的理解" (1995), 塔出版社
- 梁世旭, "韩中建交以后汉语借词的传入情况", pp.32~36 (2008), 第三届中国地域文化与国际学术会议发表论文集
- 朴炳采, "国语发达史" (1989), 世英社
- 尚玉河, "风曰孛缆和上古汉语复辅音声母的存在", 语言学论丛, 8, pp.67~84 (1981)
- 申雅沙, "韩汉音研究" (2006), 北京大学中文系博士论文
- 吴世畯, "韩语固有词和中国上古音的比较研究", 第六次韩国汉字音研究会, 11(1) (2008)
- 严翼相, "韩国古代汉字上古音说", 文镜, 6, pp.237~259 (1994)
- 严翼相, "韩国古代汉字为中国上古音说", 语言研究, 32, pp.139~147 (1997)
- 严翼相, "多音字分析", 中国语文学论集, 10, pp.381~425 (1998)
- 严翼相, "韩汉音腭化的词汇扩散", 中国学报, 41, pp.197~231 (2000)
- 严翼相, "从中国音韵学的角度看百济汉字音声母系统", 百济论丛, 7, pp.165~219 (2003)
- 严翼相, "韩国汉字音和中国方言的语音类似度", 语言暨语言学, 6(3), pp.483~498 (2005)
- 엄익상, "한국 한자어 명사와 가장 가까운 중국 방언 찾기", 중국어문학논집, 43(43), pp.143~167 (2007), 중국어문학연구회
- 严翼相, "「Nalil同源说」『韩汉语言研究" (2008), 远藤光晓
- 严翼相, "从中国语言学的角度看韩国汉字音" (2008), 韩国文化社
- Eom, Ik‐sang, "Problems in Karlgren’s Hypothesis on Sino‐Korean", Language Research, 26(2), pp.327~342 (1990)
- Eom, Ik‐sang, "A Comparative Phonology of Chinese and Sino‐Paekche Korean", 석사, pp.1991
- Eom, Ik‐sang, "The Min Dialects as the Source of Sino‐Paekche Korean", The Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Chinese Language and Linguistics, pp.220~237 (1991)
- Eom, Ik‐sang, "Some Old Chinese Initials in Sino‐Korean and Sino‐Japanese", 语言研究, 29, pp.69~84 (1995)
- Eom, Ik‐sang, "Different Layers of Borrowing: Sino‐Korean Characters with Multiple Readings", Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 27(2), pp.27~44 (1999)
- Eom, Ik‐sang, ""Pre‐Qieyun Phenomena in Old Sino‐Korean."Journal of Chinese Linguistics,29.1:84‐101", Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 29(1), pp.84~101 (2001)
- Eom, Ik‐sang, "Several Chinese Words Excavated from Indigenous Korean Lexicon", The 15th IACL Conference, pp.25~27 (2007)
- Hashimoto,Mantaro, "Language Diffusion on the Asian Continent", CAAAL, 3, pp.49~66 (1976)
- Karlgren,Bernhard, "Philology and Ancient", Goteborg: Oslo Institute for sammernlignende kulturforkning, ~ (1926)
- Oh, Young‐Kyun, "Old Chinese and Old Sino‐Korean", 석사, pp.2005
- Oh, Young‐Kyun, "Revising Old Chinese ge Rhyme Group: Some Insights from Old Sino‐Korean", The 15th IACL Conference, pp.25~27 (2007)
- Ting Pang‐hsin, "A Min Stratum in the Wu Dialects", A paper presented at the Twenty‐first International Conference on Sino‐Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, pp.7~9 (1988), University of Lund