본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

보안취약점 공개심의정책(VEP)의 법적 이해와 합리적 설계방안

Legal Understanding and Institutional Design of Vulnerabilities Equities Process

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정치외교학

초록

오늘날 보안취약점은 국가 차원에서 관리해야 하는 전략자원이다. 따라서 국가전략 관점에서 취약점을 공개하는 것이 이익인지 보관하는 것이 이익인지 판단할 수 있는 절차가 필요하다. 본 연구는 이를 위해 보안취약점 공개심의의 개념을 수용하고 공개심의정책의 구체적 설계방안을 제안했다. 먼저 취약점은 사이버안보와 직결되는 요소라는 점에서 해당 기능을 수행하는 국가정보원이 실무를 전담할 필요가 있다. 아울러 공개심의정책의 상위 의사결정기구로서 국가안보실의 신기술사이버안보비서관이 주재하고 관계부처와 민간 보안업체 및 학계 전문가가 참여하는 가칭 국가취약점관리회의를 운영할 수 있을 것이다. 이러한 운영주체 및 의사결정기구에 관한 사항과 함께 공개심의의 세부 기준과 요건, 오남용 통제에 관한 사항 등을 종합적으로 다루는 법률이 필요하다.

Abstract

Security vulnerabilities are strategic resources that must be managed at the national level. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a procedure to determine whether it is profitable to disclose or retain vulnerabilities from the national strategic point of view. To this end, this paper proposed to accept the concept of the Vulnerabilities Equities Process(VEP) and its specific design framework. First, the National Intelligence Service should be in charge of the executive secretariat in that vulnerability issues are directly related to national cybersecurity. However, as a decision-making body for VEP, a so-called ‘National Vulnerability Management Meeting’ should be set up and presided over by the New Technology and Cyber ​​Security Secretary at the Blue House National Security Office, allowing related agencies, private security firms and academic experts to participate. In addition to these matters regarding the operating entity and decision-making body, a law is needed that comprehensively deals with detailed standards and requirements for VEP, with matters on oversight system.

참고문헌 (71)

  1. 2021 연례보고서: 국가사이버안보센터, "국가정보원", ~ (2021)
  2. 김창섭, "안보 목적의 해외정보 온라인 수집을 위한 법제도 연구", 국가정보연구, 14(1), pp.71~113 (2021), 한국국가정보학회
  3. 김한균, "수사기관의 정보 수집·생산 기능 합리화 - 영국 국가범죄수사청 정보기능 분장 및 통제 사례를 중심으로", 형사소송 이론과 실무, 11(2), pp.151~174 (2019), 한국형사소송법학회[DOI]
  4. 박광민, "글로벌 정보환경에서의 방첩업무 개선방안", 외법논집, 43(2), pp.195~224 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
  5. 오일석, "미국 정보기관 제로데이 취약성 대응 활동의 법정책적 시사점", 미국헌법연구, 30(2), pp.143~185 (2019), 미국헌법학회
  6. 윤상필, "보안취약점의 사회적 인식과 법・기술적 대응전략", 박사, pp.2021
  7. 이원상, "형사법적 관점에서의 랜섬웨어 대응방안", 범죄수사학연구, 3(1) (2017), 경찰대학 수사과학연구센터
  8. 이원우, "현대적 민주법치국가에 있어서 행정통제의 구조적 특징과 쟁점", 행정법연구, (29), pp.105~133 (2011), 행정법이론실무학회
  9. 통신감청제도의 문제점과 개선방향, "이재일", 국회입법조사처, ~ (2015)
  10. 장노순, "정보기관과 비국가 행위자의 이중관계: 사이버 위협의 공개지목과 사이버 공작을 중심으로", 국가안보와 전략, 21(4), pp.43~78 (2021), 국가안보전략연구원[DOI]
  11. 전웅, "현대 국가정보학" (2015), 박영사
  12. 한희원, "국가안보 패러다임의 변화와 정보·수사 융합에 대한 법규범적 연구 - 전쟁에서 국가안보사범과의 전투로 -", 법학연구, 17(2), pp.275~302 (2017), 한국법학회
  13. Ablon, Lillian, "Zero Days, Thousands of Nights: The Life and Times of Zero-day Vulnerabilities and Their Exploits" (2017), RAND Corporation
  14. Agresti, William W., "The Four Forces Shaping Cybersecurity", Computer, 43(2) (2010), IEEE
  15. Arora, Ashish, "Impact of Vulnerability Disclosure and Patch Availability - An Empirical Analysis", The 3rd Workshop on the Economics of Information Security (2004)
  16. ASD, "Responsible Release Principles for Cyber Security Vulnerabilities" (2019)
  17. Black, Jr., William B., "Thinking Out Loud about Cyberspace" (1997), Cryptolog, National Security Agency
  18. Bowsher, Charles A., "Testimony on the Establishment of an Inspector General at the Central Intelligence Agency" (1988), Government Accountability Office
  19. Buchanan, Ben, "The Hacker and the State: Cyber Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics" (2020), Harvard University Press
  20. Cybersicherheitsstrategie für Deutschland 2021, "Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat", ~ (2021)
  21. Civiletti, Benjamin R., "Intelligence Gathering and the Law: Conflict or Compatibility?", Fordham Law Review, 48(6) (1980)
  22. CISA, "NSA-CISA-FBI Joint Advisory on Russian SVR Targeting U.S., and Allied Networks", ~ (2021)
  23. CISA, "Mitigating Log4Shell and Other Log4j-Related Vulnerabilities", Joint Cybersecurity Advisory, ~ (2021)
  24. Clarke, Richard A., "Liberty and Security in a Changing World" (2013), The President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies
  25. Global Threat Report 2019: Adversary Tradecraft and the Importance of Speed, "Crowd Strike", ~ (2019)
  26. Crowd Strike, "OverWatch Exposes AQUATIC PANDA in Possession of Log4Shell Exploit Tools During Hands-on Intrusion Attempt", ~ (2021)
  27. CSE., "CSE's Equities Management Framework", ~ (2019)
  28. Deeks, Ashley S., "Confronting and Adapting: Intelligence Agencies and International Law", Virginia Law Review, 102(3) (2016)
  29. Desai, Deven R., "Trust but Verify : A Guide to Algorithms and the Law", Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(1) (2017)
  30. Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community, "Cyber Security Strategy for Germany 2021" (2021)
  31. Franklin, Sharon B., "Strategies for Engagement Between Civil Society and Intelligence Oversight Bodies", New America, ~ (2018)
  32. Garcha, Rupinder K., "NITs a No-Go: Disclosing Exploits and Technological Vulnerabilities in Criminal Cases", New York University Law Review, 93(4) (2018)
  33. GCHQ, "The Equities Process" (2018)
  34. Herpig, Sven, "Governmental Vulnerability Assessment and Management" (2018), Stiftung Neue Verantwortung
  35. Heyman, Steven J., "The First Duty of Government: Protection, Liberty and the Fourteenth Amendment", Duke Law Journal, 41 (1991)
  36. Jaikaran, Chris, "Vulnerabilities Equities Process", Congressional Research Service, ~ (2017)
  37. Jasutis, Grazvydas, "Parliamentary Oversight of Military Intelligence, NATO Parliamentary Assembly" (2020), DCAF
  38. Joyce, Rob, "Disrupting Nation State Hackers" (2016), USENIX Enigma
  39. Kaplan, Fred, "Dark Territory: The Secret History of Cyber War" (2016), Simon & Schuster
  40. Li, Zhen, "Harnessing Uncertainty in Vulnerability Market", Proceeding of the 2018 27th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks(ICCCN) (2018), IEEE
  41. Loleski, Steve, "From cold to cyber warriors: the origins and expansion of NSA’s Tailored Access Operations(TAO) to Shadow Brokers", Intelligence and National Security, 34(1) (2019)
  42. Lowenthal, Mark M., "Intelligence: From Secret to Policy" (2012), CQ Press
  43. NSA, "Chinese State-Sponsored Actors Exploit Publicly Known Vulnerabilities", ~ (2020)
  44. NSA, "Transition 2001(declassified)", ~ (2001)
  45. Matwyshyn, Andrea M., "Ethics in Security Vulnerability Research", IEEE Security &Privacy, 8(2) (2010)
  46. ODNI, "Commercial and Government Information Technology and Industrial Control Product or System Vulnerabilities Equities Policy and Process" (2010)
  47. Posner, Richard A., "Privacy, Surveillance, and Law", The University of Chicago Law Review, 75(1) (2008)
  48. Reddick, Christopher G., "Public Opinion on National Security Agency Surveillance Programs:A Multi-Method Approach", Government Information Quarterly, 32(2) (2015)
  49. Saltzman, Ilai, "Cyber Posturing and the Offense-Defense Balance", Contemporary Security Policy, 34(1) (2013)
  50. Schneier, Bruce, "Class Breaks", Schneier on Security, ~ (2017)
  51. Schwartz, Ari, "Government’s Role in Vulnerability Disclosure: Creating a Permanent and Accountable Vulnerability Equities Process" (2016), Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center
  52. Shirey, Rob, "“Vulnerability”. Internet Security Glossary(RFC 2828)" (2000), Internet Engineering Task Force(IETF), Internet Society(ISOC)
  53. Tasheva, Iva, "DIGITAL EUROPE position paper on vulnerability stockpiling", DIGITAL EUROPE, ~ (2017)
  54. U.S. President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection, "Critical Foundations: Protecting America’s Infrastructures" (1997)
  55. Williams, Ian, "The Secrets We Keep…: Encryption and the Struggle for Software Vulnerability Disclosure Reform", Michigan Technology Law Review, 25(1) (2018)
  56. Williams, Robert D., "(Spy) Game Change: Cyber Networks, Intelligence Collection, and Covert Action", The George Washington Law Review, 79(4) (2011)
  57. Winner, Langdon, "Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought" (1978), The MIT Press
  58. Wu, Weimi, "Hacking Team Flash Zero-Day Tied To Attacks In Korea and Japan… on July 1", Trend Micro, ~ (2015)
  59. Zhang, Daniel, "Vulnerabilities Equities Process Revisited", Georgetown Security Studies Review (2019)
  60. 工业和信息化部, "网络产品安全漏洞管理规定", ~ (2021)
  61. "GCHQ Has Disclosed Over 20 Vulnerabilities This Year, Including Ones in iOS(2016.04.30.)" (2016)[URL]
  62. "Defensie slachtoffer van ernstige cyberaanval(2021.12.20.)" (2021)[URL]
  63. "The NSA hacks other countries by buying millions of dollars’ worth of computer vulnerabilities(2013.08.31.)" (2013)[URL]
  64. "Hacking Team hacked: firm sold spying tools to repressive regimes, documents claim(2015.07.06.)" (2015)[URL]
  65. "NSO Group spyware used to hack at least nine US officials’ phones(2021.12.03.)" (2021)[URL]
  66. "NSA found a dangerous Microsoft software flaw and alerted the firm-rather than weaponizing it(2020.01.14.)" (2020)[URL]
  67. "What to do with cyber vulnerabilities?(2021.07.08.)" (2021)[URL]
  68. "NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug, Exposing Consumers(2014.04.11.)" (2014)[URL]
  69. "‘Almost every nation’ now has cyber vulnerability exploitation program, NSA official says(2021.09.29.)" (2021)[URL]
  70. "Mozilla slings Firefox patches at flaw found by GCHQ's infosec arm(2016.04.28.)" (2016)[URL]
  71. "Should the government stockpile zero-day software vulnerabilities?(2017.05.19.)" (2017)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)