사회적 건축의 로컬리티 공간 현상 연구

Abstract

(Background and Purpose) Capital has served as a power to determine urban space; consequently, it has expanded urban space into architectural acts for the production demand of capital, omitting the concern about human culture using space. This environment produces social conflicts in modern society. In many places, it is not a tool of industry, but only a space for human self-practice; the architectural method of cultural activity orientation is practiced to produce spaces centered on exchange and communication rather than capital. Thus, this study aims to examine the social movement of architecture to solve the fixed problems of modern history as well as to develop a spatial theory of the social architectural perspective through the ecological phenomenon of space for the cultural recovery of the community. (Method) To set the meaning of space for “sociality” by reconsidering modern ideas. Furthermore, the practice of building a physical spatial environment is analyzed, and the roles and types of social architecture are summarized. To study the already practiced social architecture, a spatial perspective is derived from the prior study of localistic humanities, which looks at the present social phenomenon by integrating the place and social theory. With the finally derived spatial theory, we will interpret urban spaces representative of the types of social architecture to find out the value produced in the relationship between architecture and society as well as theorize the phenomenon of social space. (Results) As a result of interpreting social architecture from a localistic perspective, first, space naturally represents the public nature of the community that embodies the history of places. It reflects the history or culture of the place where the architecture is located and uses it as a practical medium to improve conscious sociality. Second, it is changing the paradigm by discovering the contradictions of modern space and denying the present placeability through heterogeneous actions. Through small architectural changes, instead of urban overall subversion, it seeks a place of communication with an attitude of engagement that preserves the traditional culture and embraces the new culture. Third, it prepares a humanitarian chapter on human basic rights against the power of capitalism in urbanization. It eases the negative direction produced by existing localities and aims to restore common social identity. (Conclusions) In conclusion, social architecture is used as a methodology of selective spaces to improve the history held by certain places. In other words, with an initial understanding of the locality of the place and subject where the architecture is located as well as implementing the selective method, a small change in solving the social problems facing modern society could create a positive and sustainable space.