건축공간에 투영되는 사회적 이념과 관광의 의미

Abstract

Tourism is one of the most actively desired leisure activities for modern people. The motivation for people to participate in tourism in earnest is related to modernity. They include natural devastation caused by industrialization, cultural disconnection related to tradition, and deviation from psychological stress following rules or plans by industrialization. In other words, modern tourism began with an alternative temporal and spatial rhythm that would solve the desire to be free from divisional work for efficiency. So tourism has become an important factor in life for people living in modern times, but it tends to be treated only as a pursuit of pleasure or a natural product of leisure. Against this backdrop, the aesthetic pursuit of achieving the goal of self-realization needs to be highlighted in that the essence of tourism given to us realizes self-satisfaction and ideals. The tourism activities met by this will contribute to the new cultural production by contacting tourists and local tourists. In addition, cultural repercussions created by looking at different tourist attractions in detail and feeling can calm and enrich daily life and society. In this study, we first question the social conditions that mediate the lives of modern people through the modernity of tourism. The main purpose is to discuss the meaning of symbolic value that emerges by looking into tourists' ideological views. In addition, we would like to analyze the space by paying attention to the symbolic value of buildings and architectural spaces that are expressed materially beyond the view of modernity of architecture and buildings exposed to the tourist environment. Second, tourism-exposed architecture discusses social empathy from a different perspective from everyday life by listing the way tourists view it through typical modernity. An analysis through ideologicalization of these spaces, which are satisfied in the information society by dismantling the architectural spaces subject to tourism, will create cultural solidarity or heterogeneity at various levels. Through this, we want to reveal that various ideological solidarity is being formed through cultural elements that are involved in the knowledge and information through it rather than architecture as a substance and product itself. As a result, the research, which seeks a sociological discussion of architecture, and architecture space as symbolic value goods in today's tate-of-the-art information society, which is empathized with the production of new, arbitrary, and symbolic images, can be secured.