신문학운동과 후스의 문학사 실천 - <중국문학 50년>을 중심으로
New Literature Movement and Hu Shi’s Practice of Writing Literature History
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Hu Shi wrote a long piece of writing on literature history from 1871 to 1922, to commemorate the 50th anniversary of Shenbao foundation, titled Chinese literature in the recent 50 years. This work deserves to be called the first chinese modern literature history in the 20th century. I give attention to this work, because I think that it has a important position in the New literature movement in the early 20th century. First, this is the first chinese modern literature history. Many chinese modern literature history published after his work, were affected from it in each deferent ways. Secondly, This work was a writing practice which Hu Shi applied his viewpoint of New literature to literature criticism and literature history. Lastly, It presented some concrete and essential point of dispute over New literature. This article intend to show how to begin to write chinese modern literature history and what were the main point of dispute of New literature movement. And I will show the historical context and discourse background of writing chinese literature history, thereby put a new perspective on New literature movement.
Abstract
Hu Shi wrote a long piece of writing on literature history from 1871 to 1922, to commemorate the 50th anniversary of Shenbao foundation, titled Chinese literature in the recent 50 years. This work deserves to be called the first chinese modern literature history in the 20th century. I give attention to this work, because I think that it has a important position in the New literature movement in the early 20th century. First, this is the first chinese modern literature history. Many chinese modern literature history published after his work, were affected from it in each deferent ways. Secondly, This work was a writing practice which Hu Shi applied his viewpoint of New literature to literature criticism and literature history. Lastly, It presented some concrete and essential point of dispute over New literature. This article intend to show how to begin to write chinese modern literature history and what were the main point of dispute of New literature movement. And I will show the historical context and discourse background of writing chinese literature history, thereby put a new perspective on New literature movement.
참고문헌 (24)
- 曹伯言, "胡適日記全編 (3)" (2001), 安徽敎育出版社
- 陳子展, "中國近代文學之變遷" (1929), 上海中華書局
- 丁守和, "辛亥革命時期期刊介紹 第5輯" (1983), 人民出版社
- 胡適, "國語文學史" (1927), 北京文化學社
- 胡適, "白話文學史(上卷)" (1934), 商務印書館
- 胡適, "輓近の支那文學" (1923), 東華社
- 黃炎培, "八十年來" (1982), 文史資料出版社
- 梁實秋, "浪漫的與古典的" (1927), 新月書店
- 黎錦熙, "國語運動史綱" (1990), 上海書店
- 淩獨見, "新著國語文學史" (1923), 商務印書館
- 劉貞晦, "中國文學變遷史" (1921), 上海新文化書社
- 魯迅, "魯迅書信集 (上)" (1976), 人民文學出版社
- 梅光迪, "評提唱新文化者", 學衡, (1) (1922)
- 申報館, "最近之五十年" (1997), 上海書店影印出版
- 譚正璧, "中國文學史大綱", 光明書局
- 譚正璧, "中國文學進化史" (1929), 光明書局
- 周策縱, "五四運動史" (1999), 嶽麓書社出版
- Tse-Tsung Chow, "The May Fourth Movement : intellectual revolution in modern China" (1960), Harvard University Press
- 胡先驌, "評胡適≪五十年來中國之文學≫", 學衡, (18) (1923)
- 胡先驌, "評≪嘗試集≫(續)", 學衡, (2) (1922)
- 林紓, "致蔡鶴卿書", 公言報 (1919)
- 嚴既澄, "嚴既澄致鄭振鐸", 小說月報, 14(6) (1923)
- 嚴既澄, "與胡適之先生談談文學史上的“大”和“小”", 文學旬刊, 74 (1923)
- 增田涉, "黃遵憲について(覺書)", 人文研究(大阪市立大學), 15(6) (1964)
