1990년대 이후 네덜란드 도시기반시설의 건축통합적 디자인을 통한 공공성 구현에 관한 연구

Abstract

(Background and Purpose) In the wake of globalization and individualization dismantling the traditional definition of public space, there is a need for a new paradigm of publicness, as attempts have been made to (re)define public space and publicness from various perspectives. Since the 1990s, however, amid concerns that public spaces have not contributed to the improvement of the quality of everyday life, there has been an increasing interest in processes by which the composite system of infrastructure in contemporary urban space restructures urban publicness. Accordingly, this thesis works toward the development of a method for infrastructure-centered publicness in the design of urban public space by considering the relationship between infrastructure and public space, taking into account the changes in the concept of publicness in the age of globalization and personalization, in the context of Dutch architectural policies. (Method) Accordingly, this study focuses on documents related to the Dutch National Policy Document on Spatial Planning (NOTA) and the Architectural Policy of the Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM) to review important sections of Dutch policies related to public spaces. After examining the dominant discourse on public space and policies framed in the urban conditions of the Netherlands based on these data, this paper intends to analyze the system as a whole, from the policy and systematic foundation to practical strategies. (Results) This relationship shows two distinctive characteristics: “accessibility and adaptability of urban public space focused on infrastructure” and “diversity and specificity of the liminal space constructed by infrastructure.” The former demands an integrative environmental design approach to designing public space and traffic space in order to acquire a multi-layered architectural program incorporating attention to urban infrastructure, while the latter implies that infrastructure has been transformed into the foundation of everyday life. This indicates the possibility of producing a new shared space unreflected in the division between public and private space. (Conclusions) The infrastructure-integrated architecture and urbanism broadly discussed in Europe nowadays is merely a combination of architecture and dispersed infrastructure as a new condition for social mobility and communication, indicating the need for an urban landscape with attention not only to architecture, but also to public space in contact with infrastructure and the urban landscape simultaneously. This type of experimental thinking on the infrastructure-mediated relationship between private space and public space was made possible by the important role of the second and third Architectural Policy, which emphasized socio-cultural publicness as well as integrated management between entities for detailed project implementation, extending their influence beyond simply the physical space environment.