본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

민간조사업 도입법안 논의와 그 입법대안 - 제19대국회 제출법안을 중심으로 -

Discussion About a Bill for The Introduction of Private Investigation Business and its Legislative Alternatives - Focus on a Bill Presented in the 19th National Assembly -

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

It has been continuously raised to assert the necessity and appropriateness for the introduction of private investigation business aiming to prevent social harmful effects due to the covert·illegal private investigation activities of a detective agency, which is recently pointed out as a severe social problem, and to protect the rights & interests of people and to recover their damage. The National Assembly’s legislation efforts and lawmaking activities to regulate the aspect of behaviors which are thoughtlessly conducted in a private sector have been continued. after reflecting the formation of a social consensus and any requests from all walks of life against this social harmful effect. The serious lawmaking activities in the National Assembly for the purpose of the legislation of private investigation business was started from the 17th National Assembly and its legislative bills have been raised over 9 rounds in a method of legislation by Assembly members until the 19th National Assembly. Nonetheless the reason the lawmaking activities in the national Assembly were not effectively progressed is due to the followings: the lack of agreement for the legislation of private investigation business, the business duplication with other business area and its possibility of infringement, the government’s unsatisfactory legislative supporting activities, the difference between administrative departments about the establishment method of standards and the designation of jurisdictional administrative agency for the administration & supervision of the private investigation business, and concerns about the adverse and side effects the system such as personal information leakage and privacy invasion, etc. Because of this reason, the efforts for its legislation in the successive National Assembly shows aspects in which the legislative bills have been automatically abolished by the proposer’s voluntary withdrawal or the expiration of National Assembly’s session to repeat consumptive lawmaking activities. In the future, a legislative discussion in the National Assembly for the purpose of introducing the private investigation business is required to review carefully the introduction of the system by conducting in the view of public law the in-depth approach of main issues such as the establishment method of standards for the regulation of the private investigation business, the work scope of a private investigator, the qualification of a private investigator, the operation body of the private investigation business, and the designation of jurisdictional administrative agency for the administration & supervision of the private investigation business.

Abstract

It has been continuously raised to assert the necessity and appropriateness for the introduction of private investigation business aiming to prevent social harmful effects due to the covert·illegal private investigation activities of a detective agency, which is recently pointed out as a severe social problem, and to protect the rights & interests of people and to recover their damage. The National Assembly’s legislation efforts and lawmaking activities to regulate the aspect of behaviors which are thoughtlessly conducted in a private sector have been continued. after reflecting the formation of a social consensus and any requests from all walks of life against this social harmful effect. The serious lawmaking activities in the National Assembly for the purpose of the legislation of private investigation business was started from the 17th National Assembly and its legislative bills have been raised over 9 rounds in a method of legislation by Assembly members until the 19th National Assembly. Nonetheless the reason the lawmaking activities in the national Assembly were not effectively progressed is due to the followings: the lack of agreement for the legislation of private investigation business, the business duplication with other business area and its possibility of infringement, the government’s unsatisfactory legislative supporting activities, the difference between administrative departments about the establishment method of standards and the designation of jurisdictional administrative agency for the administration & supervision of the private investigation business, and concerns about the adverse and side effects the system such as personal information leakage and privacy invasion, etc. Because of this reason, the efforts for its legislation in the successive National Assembly shows aspects in which the legislative bills have been automatically abolished by the proposer’s voluntary withdrawal or the expiration of National Assembly’s session to repeat consumptive lawmaking activities. In the future, a legislative discussion in the National Assembly for the purpose of introducing the private investigation business is required to review carefully the introduction of the system by conducting in the view of public law the in-depth approach of main issues such as the establishment method of standards for the regulation of the private investigation business, the work scope of a private investigator, the qualification of a private investigator, the operation body of the private investigation business, and the designation of jurisdictional administrative agency for the administration & supervision of the private investigation business.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 김동희, "行政法Ⅰ" (2014), 박영사
  2. 김동희, "行政法Ⅱ" (2014), 박영사
  3. 김문성, "정책학" (2014), 박영사
  4. 김종식, "민간조사학개론" (2010), 예응
  5. 박균성, "行政法論上" (2014), 박영사
  6. 박균성, "行政法論下" (2014), 박영사
  7. 이시윤, "新民事訴訟法" (2014), 박영사
  8. 이재상, "형법총론" (2014), 박영사
  9. 이재상, "형사소송법" (2014), 박영사
  10. 정종섭, "憲法學原論" (2014), 박영사
  11. 최병선, "政府規制論" (2013), 법문사
  12. 허 영, "한국헌법론" (2014), 박영사
  13. 홍정선, "경찰행정법" (2013), 박영사
  14. 강동욱, "민간조사제도의 도입에 관한 논의 - 국회 관련법률안을 중심으로 -", 법과정책연구, 13(3), pp.1051~1076 (2013), 한국법정책학회
  15. 서봉석, "형사상 불법행위와 민사상 불법행위", 법학논고, (33), pp.285~306 (2010), 법학연구원
  16. 신형석, "民間調査制度 導入에 관한 立法政策的 硏究", 박사, 법학과 공법전공, pp.2014
  17. 신형석, "개정 경비업법의 규제수단강화와 그 정책적 함의", 아주법학, 7(3), pp.103~129 (2013), 법학연구소
  18. 이상원, "민간조사(탐정)제도의 도입방향 - 경비업법 개정을 중심으로 -", 한국경호경비학회지, (17), pp.235~253 (2008), 한국경호경비학회
  19. 이상원, "민간조사업 법안의 발전방안에 관한 연구", 한국민간경비학회보, (9) (2007)
  20. 이성용, "민간경비활동의 헌법적 한계", 헌법학연구, 12(5), pp.359~389 (2006), 한국헌법학회
  21. 정일석, "민간조사업 관리ㆍ감독 기관 선정에 관한 연구", 한국경호경비학회지, (21), pp.135~154 (2009), 한국경호경비학회
  22. 조규범, "민간조사제도 도입 논의의 쟁점과 과제", 이슈와 논점, (627) (2013)
  23. 민간조사원(사설탐정) 제도의 도입 방안에 관한 연구; 「민간조사업법안」과 「경비업법안」의 쟁점을 중심으로, "황병돈", 대검찰청 검찰미래기획단, ~ (2009)
  24. "국회법제사법위원회회의록", 제316회 국회(임시회) 법제사법 제3차(제3호), ~ (2013)
  25. "국회행정안전위원회회의록", 제313회 국회(임시회) 행정안전 제1차(제1호), ~ (2013)
  26. , 국회입법조사처[URL]
  27. "국회의안정보시스템"[URL]
  28. 민간조사업에 관한 법률안 검토보고, "국회법제사법위원회", ~ (2013)
  29. 경비업법전부개정법률안 검토보고서, "국회행정안전위원회", ~ (2013)
  30. 고용노동부, "신직업육성추진계획 보도자료, 2014,3,18.일자", ~ (2014)
  31. 민간조사제도 법제화 필요성과 바람직한 도입방안, "경찰청", ~ (2013)
  32. "대법원종합법률정보"[URL]
  33. 대한변호사협회, "경비업법일부개정법률안(이인기의원 대표발의)에 대한 의견", ~ (2009)
  34. 대한변호사협회, "민간조사업법안(강성천의원 대표발의)에 대한 검토의견서", ~ (2010)
  35. "민간조사업(탐정) 도입관련 학술세미나", 국회·경찰청·대한민간조사연구학회, ~ (2015)
  36. "민간조사제도(공인탐정) 도입을 위한 입법공청회자료집", 국회의원정책자료DB, ~ (2008)
  37. "민간조사업법안에 관한 공청회 자료집", 행정자치위원회, ~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)