국내 한국어교육기관 교재 어휘 분석 연구 1 -양적 분석을 중심으로-
An Analysis of Vocabularies in the Korean Textbooks: Based on Textbooks Used by Intensive Courses in the Korean Language Education Centers
1
조회
0
다운로드
21
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to conduct vocabulary analysis of 66 Korean textbooks used in major Korean language institutes. Since the number of Korean learners with instrumental motivation has been increased significantly, it becomes a very important issue to evaluate their Korean proficiency levels measured through the official assessment of Korean Proficiency Test (TOPIK). Language teaching is subject to certain target learners, and it is necessary to proceed with study on them considering utilization of research results. Especially vocabulary teaching should have focused more on certain target learners not only connecting with learners' needs but also with course topics and communicative functions. In terms of curriculum management and evaluation, it is critical to select vocabulary based on proficiency levels using systematic methods and procedures. In particular, the study of vocabulary selection considering proficiency levels is an essential part of language teaching and learning for the development of Korean Language materials and official proficiency tests. Therefore, this study attempts to analyze vocabulary in Korean textbooks to provide basic data for selection of adequate vocabulary for each of beginner, intermediate and advanced level of learners. A curriculum should be targeted to specific learners. Thus the target of this study is limited to learners with 200 hour-long classes per each level. The length of each level complies with time usually demanded in the standard of each level in TOPIK and general language institutes of Korea. The current study analyzed Korean textbooks from level I to VI as a full set of data published by five different Korean language institutes in 2014.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to conduct vocabulary analysis of 66 Korean textbooks used in major Korean language institutes. Since the number of Korean learners with instrumental motivation has been increased significantly, it becomes a very important issue to evaluate their Korean proficiency levels measured through the official assessment of Korean Proficiency Test (TOPIK). Language teaching is subject to certain target learners, and it is necessary to proceed with study on them considering utilization of research results. Especially vocabulary teaching should have focused more on certain target learners not only connecting with learners' needs but also with course topics and communicative functions. In terms of curriculum management and evaluation, it is critical to select vocabulary based on proficiency levels using systematic methods and procedures. In particular, the study of vocabulary selection considering proficiency levels is an essential part of language teaching and learning for the development of Korean Language materials and official proficiency tests. Therefore, this study attempts to analyze vocabulary in Korean textbooks to provide basic data for selection of adequate vocabulary for each of beginner, intermediate and advanced level of learners. A curriculum should be targeted to specific learners. Thus the target of this study is limited to learners with 200 hour-long classes per each level. The length of each level complies with time usually demanded in the standard of each level in TOPIK and general language institutes of Korea. The current study analyzed Korean textbooks from level I to VI as a full set of data published by five different Korean language institutes in 2014.
참고문헌 (22)
- 강현화, "한국어교육용 중급 어휘 선정에 대한 연구", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 40, pp.1~48 (2014), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- 강현화, "한국어교육용 초급 어휘 선정 연구", 문법 교육, 21, pp.1~26 (2014), 한국문법교육학회
- 김춘화, "한국어 교재의 어휘빈도에 관한 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2007
- 류징, "한국어 초급 교재의 주제 유형과 어휘 분석 : 한국 내 교재와 중국 현지화 교재의 비교를 바탕으로", 석사, 한국학협동과정 한국어교육전공, pp.2012
- 민경모, "한국어 고급 교재의 단원별 어휘량 및 어휘 반복도 분석 연구", 언어와 문화, 10(1), pp.79~100 (2014), 한국언어문화교육학회
- 박수현, "학습 전략을 활용한 한국어 어휘 교재의 단원 구성 방안 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2008
- 성보금, "초급 한국어 교재에 나타난 어휘 분석 : 한국어능력시험 1·2급 어휘·문법 영역의 어휘를 중심으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2010
- Mizuma Ikumi, "초급 한국어 교재의 어휘 항목 분석 : 일본 현지화 교재와 한국 출간 교재의 비교를 바탕으로", 석사, 한국학협동과정 한국어교육전공, pp.2013
- 이해영, "학습자 중심 수업을 위한 교재 분석", 한국어교육, 12(1) (2001), 국제한국어교육학회
- 진대연, "한국어 교재 분석의 기준", 國語敎育學硏究, 9(1) (1999), 국어교육학회
- 한송화, "연세대학교 한국어학당 교재 분석", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 28, pp.331~362 (2003), 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- 황인교, "국내‧외 한국어 교재 분석*", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 28, pp.287~329 (2003), 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- Thorndike, E, "Selected Writings, vol. 9.", pp.168~ (1944), IRET
- C.K. Ogden, "Basic English: International Second Language", pp.116~ (1943)
- West, M., "A general service list of English words" (1953), Longman, Green
- Coxhead, A. J., "An academic word list (English Language Institute Occasional Publication No. 18)", pp.1998
- Coxhead, A., "A new academic word list", TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), pp.213~238 (2000)
- Campion, M., "An academic vocabulary list" (1971), New Zealand Council for Educational Research
- Praninskas, J., "American university word list" (1972), Longman
- Lynn, R. W., "Preparing word lists: a suggested method", RELC Journal, 4(1), pp.25~32 (1973)
- Ghadessy, P., "Frequency counts, words lists, and materials preparation:A new approach", English Teaching Forum, 17, pp.24~27 (1979)
- Xue, G., "A university word list", Language Learning and Communication, 3, pp.215~229 (1984)