한국어와 중국어 계사구문의 대조 연구 - 통사적 분포와 의미 기능 확장을 중심으로 -
A Contrastive Study on copular construction in Korean and Chinese - focused on syntactic distribution and extension of semantic function -
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to make a comparative analysis between Korean and Chinese copular construction from a perspective of language typology and give an analysis on the similarities and differences between two languages. According to the definition of Pustet(2003), copulas are a linguistic element which co-occurs with certain lexemes in certain languages when they function as predicate nucleus. And it does not add any semantic content to the predicate phrase it is contained in. The above function apply to the Korean ’이다’ and the Chinese ‘是’, which are considered as copulas in their own language. However, Korean and Chinese, each belonging to a different language, there is a great difference of two language copulas. In addition, there has hardly any research on comparative copulas construction between South Korea and China than all previous studies. Based on this situation, the paper takes the utility copular construction of people's daily life as research objects to analyze the usage of '이다' and '是'. There are mainly two forms of variation of cross linguistic of copular construction. One is the complement of copulas construction that is not only limited to nominal composition, the other is expansion aspect of copulas construction function. The paper focuses on analyzing the variation of the copulas construction between Korean and Chinese. I hope that the research results of this paper could give a favor for Chinese learners who learning Korean.
Abstract
This paper aims to make a comparative analysis between Korean and Chinese copular construction from a perspective of language typology and give an analysis on the similarities and differences between two languages. According to the definition of Pustet(2003), copulas are a linguistic element which co-occurs with certain lexemes in certain languages when they function as predicate nucleus. And it does not add any semantic content to the predicate phrase it is contained in. The above function apply to the Korean ’이다’ and the Chinese ‘是’, which are considered as copulas in their own language. However, Korean and Chinese, each belonging to a different language, there is a great difference of two language copulas. In addition, there has hardly any research on comparative copulas construction between South Korea and China than all previous studies. Based on this situation, the paper takes the utility copular construction of people's daily life as research objects to analyze the usage of '이다' and '是'. There are mainly two forms of variation of cross linguistic of copular construction. One is the complement of copulas construction that is not only limited to nominal composition, the other is expansion aspect of copulas construction function. The paper focuses on analyzing the variation of the copulas construction between Korean and Chinese. I hope that the research results of this paper could give a favor for Chinese learners who learning Korean.
참고문헌 (40)
- 강미석, "국어의 계사 '-이' 연구 : 언어 유형론의 시각에서", 석사, 국문학, pp.2008
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 高暢洙, "語幹形成 接尾辭의 設定에 對하여 : 統辭論的 機能과 관련하여", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1986
- 고창수, "국어의 통사적 어형성", 국어학, 22, pp.259~269 (1992), 국어학회
- 김광해, "계사론, In 난대 이응백 박사 회갑기념 논문집" (1983), 보진재
- 김민수, "국어문법론 연구" (1960), 통문관
- 남기심, "현대 국어 통사론" (2001), 태학사
- 남길임, "현대 국어"이다"구문 연구" (2004), 한국문화사
- 남길임, "지정사 이다, 왜 다시 품사론인가" (2006), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 남길임, "‘아니다’의 사용패턴과 부정의 의미", 한국어 의미학, 33, pp.41~65 (2010), 한국어의미학회
- 박진호, "의미지도를 이용한 한국어 어휘요소와 문법요소의 의미 기술", 國語學, (63), pp.459~519 (2012), 국어학회
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1994), 한국문화사
- 송민용, "현대 중국어 '是'구문의 구조와 특성", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.2006
- 시정곤, "이다의 ‘이-’가 접사인 이유", 주시경학보, 11 (1993)
- 시정곤, "이다' 구문과 통사적 접사설을 다시 논의함", 한국어학, 28, pp.55~80 (2005), 한국어학회
- 이희승, "초등국어문법" (1949), 박문출판사
- 양정석, "이다’의 문법범주와 의미", 국어학, 37, pp.337~366 (2001), 국어학회
- 임홍빈, "국어 문법론1" (1995), 한국방송통신대학교 출판부
- 임홍빈, "국어 품사 분류의 몇 가지 문제에 대하여, In 국어 연구의 이론과 실제" (2001), 태학사
- 임홍빈, "정체 밝힘의 형용사‘이다’문제와 연어, In 어문학 연구의 넓이와 깊이" (2005), 도서출판 역
- 일언, "지정사구문과 존재구문의 화용론적 비교고찰", 中國 朝鮮語文, (86), pp.12~15 (1996), 길림성민족사무위원회
- 정인승, "표준 중등말본" (1949), 어문각
- 진 열, "'이다' 구문에 대한 연구 : 중국어에서의 대응형식을 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.2012
- 최현배, "우리 말본" (1937), 정음사
- 최흥수, "‘是’자의 번역에 대하여", 중국조선어문, (56), pp.49~52 (1991), 길림성민족사무위원회
- 탄나나, "한·중 부정문 대조 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2012
- 홍사만, "국어의미분석론" (2008), 한국문화사
- 홍재성, "프랑스어와 한국어 계사구문의 유형론적 대조 연구", 학술원 논문집, 49, pp.29~89 (2010), 학술원
- 陈天福, "论‘是’字文", 河南大学学报, (1) (1995)
- 黎锦熙, "新著国语文法" (2000), 商务印书馆
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1981), 商务印书馆
- 丁声树, "现代汉语语法讲话" (1961), 北京商务印书馆
- 胡裕树, "现代汉语" (1979), 上海教育出版社
- 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法" (2003), 商务印书館
- 黄伯荣, "现代汉语" (1991), 高等教育出版社
- 王力, "中国现代语法" (1985), 商务印书馆
- 王力, "汉语语法史" (2000), 北京商务印书馆
- 肖亚曼, "汉语繁词‘是’的来源与成因研究", 박사, pp.2003
- Matti Miestanmo, "Standard Negation" (2005), Mouton de Gruyter
- Pustet, "Copulas-Universals in the Categorization of the Lexicon" (2003), Oxford University Press