한국어 중급 교재의 대화문에 나타난대인관계적 기능과 그 구현 양상 분석

Abstract

Through the analysis of an interpersonal function and its materialization in the dialogue of Korean intermediate textbook, this paper aims to suggest the parts needed to be supplemented in the construction of the dialogue to elaborate the ability of performing an interpersonal function by Korean language learners. For this, it has selected an interpersonal function as the criteria to analyze an interpersonal function and its materialization and suggests the method of analyzing the strategies. This paper has conducted a survey targeting experts of Korean language education and native speakers of Korean and selected 18 interpersonal functions. The analysis of the function follows politeness theory of Brown & Levinson(1987). After choosing 4 intermediate textbooks of Korean as the object of analysis, this paper analyzed linguistic expressions without a context and opening utterances of the dialogues in textbooks. The result of the analysis on linguistic expressions without a context shows us problems that people in unfamiliar relations seldom appear as participants in the dialogue and social and formal utterance settings are very few compared to private and everyday settings. From the result of analysis on opening utterances, it is found that in level 3 textbooks utterances for requesting reaction forms more than 70% of the dialogue, however, in level 4 textbooks utterances for representation increase a little. In the analysis of an interpersonal function in the dialogue, the number in which an interpersonal function is materialized as the main function of the dialogue is not much problematic, however, the number in which an interpersonal function is materialized as the partial function of the dialogue is too small. With the analysis of materializing an interpersonal function through specific utterance strategies, this paper finds out that in relation to positive politeness strategies, ‘claiming common ground’ strategy is mostly used and in relation to negative politeness strategies, ‘question, hedge’ strategy is chiefly used. Utterance that follows the utterance in which utterance strategy of an interpersonal function is materialized has more acceptance speech acts, however, expanding reaction is often followed. This can be pointed out as the reason that makes the activity focused on the aspect of materializing an interpersonal function through the dialogue difficult.