베트남어권 한국어 학습자의 수량 구성 사용 양상 및 오류 분석

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the overall usage patterns and errors in Korean quantification constructions produced by Vietnamese learners of Korean. For this purpose, both quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted based on a learner corpus of Vietnamese-speaking learners. In terms of classifier usage, the learners generally showed appropriate use of classifiers that frequently appear in everyday situations. Regarding the types of quantification constructions, the learners’ distribution of usage across types largely resembled that of native Korean speakers. However, unlike native speakers who tend to prefer the N–Q type, the learners used the Q–N type more frequently, which marks a notable difference. Errors were categorized into three types: errors related to the types of quantification constructions, errors in quantifier usage, and errors in classifier usage. While quantifier and classifier errors tended to decrease as learners' proficiency increased, errors related to the types of quantification constructions showed an increasing trend. More specifically, the most frequent errors related to quantification construction types involved the use of the Q–CL–N type or Q–N type in contexts where the N–Q–CL type or N–Q type would be more appropriate, as well as incorrect particle usage within the N–Q–CL type and N–Q type constructions. In terms of quantifier usage, frequent errors included the substitution of native Korean quantifiers with Sino-Korean ones, and confusion between cardinal numerals and numeral adnominals. With regard to classifier usage, the most frequent errors involved the selection of inappropriate classifiers for specific contexts.