汚染不動産 鑑定評價의 스티그마 效果
Stigma Effects in Valuation of Contaminated Real Property
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze environmental stigma effects according to a negative image in valuation of contaminated real property. It needs to analyze the costs of remedying pollutant, the limited use in the context of the highest and best use, and the stigma like a negative image for appraisal on contaminated real property. Depreciation by the limited use through the comparison with the costs of remedying and the highest and best use is the parts accessible in appraisal because it is tangible and quantitative. However, the stigma is very hard to valuate due to diminution and uncertainty of marketability. This study is based on the theory about valuation of contaminated real property and psychological theory to understand psychological influences. And this study adopts lawsㆍregulations, behavioral science and decision-making approaches. A survey was conducted to analyze depreciation by psychological repugnance (a negative image) at that time and at the present as to previously contaminated real property. The results of research are as follows: Stigma effects like psychological repugnance(a negative image) are not clearly distinguishable as a result of empirical analysis. That’s because rapid improvement of environment such as traffic and amenities around the property is helpful to increase people’s preference. There are significant perceptual differences in psychological repugnance(a negative image) between people at the past and present. In the future, the higher the importance of environment will be, the more likely valuation of contaminated real property will be to increase. The necessity of lively research about stigma effects is also required at our appraisal businesses.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze environmental stigma effects according to a negative image in valuation of contaminated real property. It needs to analyze the costs of remedying pollutant, the limited use in the context of the highest and best use, and the stigma like a negative image for appraisal on contaminated real property. Depreciation by the limited use through the comparison with the costs of remedying and the highest and best use is the parts accessible in appraisal because it is tangible and quantitative. However, the stigma is very hard to valuate due to diminution and uncertainty of marketability. This study is based on the theory about valuation of contaminated real property and psychological theory to understand psychological influences. And this study adopts lawsㆍregulations, behavioral science and decision-making approaches. A survey was conducted to analyze depreciation by psychological repugnance (a negative image) at that time and at the present as to previously contaminated real property. The results of research are as follows: Stigma effects like psychological repugnance(a negative image) are not clearly distinguishable as a result of empirical analysis. That’s because rapid improvement of environment such as traffic and amenities around the property is helpful to increase people’s preference. There are significant perceptual differences in psychological repugnance(a negative image) between people at the past and present. In the future, the higher the importance of environment will be, the more likely valuation of contaminated real property will be to increase. The necessity of lively research about stigma effects is also required at our appraisal businesses.
참고문헌 (31)
- 방경식, "부동산학총론" (2009), 부연사
- 안정근, "부동산평가이론" (2006), 법문사
- 이정전, "토지경제학" (2009), 박영사
- 장현갑, "힐가드와 애트킨슨의 심리학원론" (2004), 박학사
- 森島義博, "はじめての土壤汚染と不動産評價" (2005), 近代セ―ルス社
- Appraisal Institute, "The appraisal of Real Estate 13th" (2008), the Appraisal Institute
- Friedman, Jack P., "Dictionary of Real Estate Terms" (2008), Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.
- Roddewig, Richard J., "Valuing Contaminated Properties-An Appraisal Institute Anthology" (2002), the Appraisal Institute
- 황종현, "토양오염부동산의 감정평가방법에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2007
- 토양오염 부동산의 평가에 관한 연구, "김태훈", 한국부동산연구원, ~ (2006)
- 수도권정책 T, "F 주간동향분석 보고", 이명훈, 2003
- 토양오염물질의 물리ㆍ화학적 특성과 이동성에 따른 환경영향평가방안, "정승우", 한국환경정책ㆍ평가연구원, ~ (2003)
- 신재영, "오염토지의 가치평가 사례분석 -부산시 문현동 금융단지를 기준으로-", 감정평가, (56), pp.29~38 (2003), 한국감정평가협회
- 양강호, "감정평가 활동에 있어 토양오염이 야기하는 위험부담", 감정평가, (56), pp.39~44 (2003), 한국감정평가협회
- 임석회, "오염부동산의 평가와 스티그마 효과", 감정평가연구, 9, pp.191~210 (1999), 한국부동산연구원
- Bond, Sandy, "Stigma assessment: the case of a remediated contaminated site", Journal of Property Investment, 19(2), pp.188~210 (2001)
- Closser, Bruce M., "Fuel-Oil Contamination of a Residence: A Case Study in Stigma", The Appraisal Journal, pp.307~311 (2001)
- Gluck, Allan E., "Mitigating Factors in Appraisal & Valuation of Contaminated Real Property", Real Estate Issues, 25(2), pp.22~29 (2000)
- Jackson, Thomas O., "Methods and Techniques for Contaminated Property Valuation", The Appraisal Journal, pp.311~320 (2003)
- Jackson, Thomas O., "Case Studies Analysis: Environmental Stigma and Monitored Natural attenuation", The Appraisal Journal, (Spring), pp.111~118 (2004)
- Jackson, Thomas O., "Evaluating Environmental Stigma with Multiple Regression Analysis", The Appraisal Journal, (Fall), pp.363~369 (2005)
- Mundy, Bill, "Stigma and Value", The Appraisal Journal, pp.7~13 (1992)
- Roddewig, Richard, "Stigma, Environmental Risk and Property Value: 10 Critical Inquiries", The Appraisal Journal, pp.375~387 (1996)
- Roddewig, Richard, "Temporary Stigma : Lessons from the Exxon Valdez Litigation", The Appraisal Journal, pp.96~101 (1997)
- "국가기록원 나라기록"[URL]
- "위키백과"[URL]
- "KB아파트 시세"[URL]
- "한국감정평가협회"[URL]
- "한국공인중개사협회"[URL]
- "국가법령정보센터"[URL]
- "농민신문"[URL]