이현화 희곡의 반복 충동과 연행성 - 「오스트라키스모스」를 중심으로 -
The repetitious instinct and performativity of Lee Hyun Hwa's play - with「Ostrakismos」as the center -
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper's aim is to present a new research perspective about the repetitious instinct and performativity shown by 「Ostrakismos」, so as to broaden an understanding of the latter part of Lee Hyun Hwa's drama such as 「Bulgabluga」, 「Nuckssy」, 「Kirie」, 「Hyupjongmanchi」 where a critical mind on the history is a prominent feature. In other words, this paper's aim is to find the clue to the latter part of Lee Hyun Hwa's drama by singly investigating 「Ostrakismos」, utilizing an analytic tool of repetitious instinct and performativity. Of course, although a general study about the world of Lee Hyun Hwa's works is thoughtfully achieved, a discuss about each text is scant, except early controversial work as 「Who are you?」, 「Shi-shi-shi-it」, and the works standing in high estimation as 「Bulgabluga」, 「Kadenza」, 「Sanssitgim」. In fact, a research about 「Ostrakismos」 is few. Therefore, a research for 「Ostrakismos」 will largely explain a later dramas' thema focusing on the history, because 「Ostrakismos」's story consists of a play within play related a historical memory, namely, assassinating Gaius Julius. Moreover, this paper is expected to a significant attempt which accounts for overall discourse of Lee Hyun Hwa's texts and reveals its character.
Abstract
This paper's aim is to present a new research perspective about the repetitious instinct and performativity shown by 「Ostrakismos」, so as to broaden an understanding of the latter part of Lee Hyun Hwa's drama such as 「Bulgabluga」, 「Nuckssy」, 「Kirie」, 「Hyupjongmanchi」 where a critical mind on the history is a prominent feature. In other words, this paper's aim is to find the clue to the latter part of Lee Hyun Hwa's drama by singly investigating 「Ostrakismos」, utilizing an analytic tool of repetitious instinct and performativity. Of course, although a general study about the world of Lee Hyun Hwa's works is thoughtfully achieved, a discuss about each text is scant, except early controversial work as 「Who are you?」, 「Shi-shi-shi-it」, and the works standing in high estimation as 「Bulgabluga」, 「Kadenza」, 「Sanssitgim」. In fact, a research about 「Ostrakismos」 is few. Therefore, a research for 「Ostrakismos」 will largely explain a later dramas' thema focusing on the history, because 「Ostrakismos」's story consists of a play within play related a historical memory, namely, assassinating Gaius Julius. Moreover, this paper is expected to a significant attempt which accounts for overall discourse of Lee Hyun Hwa's texts and reveals its character.
참고문헌 (21)
- 이현화, "시나리오 전집 2" (2007), 연극과인간
- 딜런, 에반스, "라캉 정신분석 사전" (1998), 인간사랑
- 프로이트, 지그문트, "정신 병리학의 문제들" (2003), 열린책들
- 위베르스펠트, 안느, "연극기호학" (1988), 문학과 지성사
- 권혜경, "이현화 희곡에 드러나는 '텍스트의 불안' 연구", 석사, pp.2009
- 김미도, "이현화 희곡 연구", 논문집, 48(1), pp.37~51 (1998)
- 김옥란, "1970년대 희곡과 여성 재현의 새로운 방식", 민족문학사연구, 26, pp.63~84 (2004), 민족문학사학회
- 박혜령, "한국판사실주의 희곡 연구 :작품을 중심으로", 박사, 국문과, pp.1995
- 배선애, "소통의 단절과 관계의 부재 - 1970년대를 바라보는 희곡의 시선", 민족문학사연구, 26, pp.111~138 (2004), 민족문학사학회
- 손화숙, "이현화론 - 관객의 일상성에서 벗어나기 위한 연극적 기법", 한국극예술연구, 2, pp.275~290 (1992), 한국극예술학회
- 신현숙, "이현화의 극작술에 대한 소고 : ‘지문’을 중심으로,한국희곡작가연구", pp.407~427 (1997), 태학사
- 이미원, "이현화 희곡과 포스트모더니즘", 한국연극학, 16(1), pp.41~63 (2001), 한국연극학회
- 이상란, "오태석 연극의 연행성 -<로미오와 줄리엣>을 중심으로-", 한국연극학, (41), pp.39~75 (2010), 한국연극학회
- 이상우, "폭력과 성스러움 .이현화 희곡.시나리오 전집 2", pp.226~227 (2007), 연극과인간
- 임준서, "역사의 악순환에 응전하는 역설의 화법 .이현화 희곡.시나리오 전집 3", pp.297~312 (2007), 연극과인간
- 최상민, "이현화 희곡에서 ‘주체’의 위기와 죽음의 문제 ― 담화 공간을 중심으로", 현대문학이론연구, (36), pp.263~286 (2009), 현대문학이론학회
- Blau, Herbert, "Rehearsing the impossible : the insane root. In Psychoanalysis and performance", pp.21~33, Routledge
- Brooks, Peter, "Freud's masterplot : questions of narrative, In Literature and psychoanalysis : the question of reading, otherwise", pp.281~299 (1982), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Kristeva, Julia, "Psychoanalysis and the Polis", Critical Inquiry, 9(1), pp.77~92 (1982)
- Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith, "The Paradoxical Status of Repetition", Poetics Today, 1(4), pp.151~159 (1980)
- Wright, Elizabeth, "Psychoanalysis and the Theatrical: Analysing Performance In Analysing Performance: A Critical Reader", pp.175~190 (1996), Manchester UP