근대 초기 시형의 모색과 율격 논의 - 김억의 「격조시형론」을 중심으로-
Explore the poetic form and discuss the metrical theory of early modern era -Based on Kyeokjosi of Kim Uk's-
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Kyeokjosi theory is the definitive work of Kim Uk's poetics theory as well as a meaningful work in the history of our Korean poetics. While exploring Kyeokjosi, Kim Uk sticked to the versification as a new paradigm of poetry which should be evaluated as a positive achievement. There is a high possibility that Kyeokjosi he was sought initially could be a free style poetry with meter enlivened in it. Specially, he had been studying on the pattern of Korean poetry from long times ago already, and it seems to have been recognized by him that what was the necessary to free style poem was the poem that has rhythm in it. Despite such positive evaluation, his Kyeokjosi theory has a clear limitation as well. The effort of Kim Uk intended to provide ideal pattern of Kyeokjosi based on the theory of the meter exposed a substantial limitation from the theory he had been sticked to. As a result he failed to find out a style of Kyeokjosi proper to us and hastily led to the frame of 7.5 phrase 12 syllables. This in turn provided a ground that Kyeokjosi was intended to imitate close to the meter of Japanese poetry. The interest of Kim Uk was to seek the most ideal Kyeokjosi, as a result of which he didn't pay much attention to the fact that Kyeokjosi has become a poetry with fixed Syllable meter. It is a clear mistake that he sought idealistic Kyeokjosi in the fixed syllabic meter. In additon, Kim Uk's Kyeokjosi theory had not gained opportunity to be developed to the discussions of the typicality of the poetry at all that goes beyond the basic unit meter or basic unit which forms standard unit of meter. That is due to the inability to understand clearly with regard to the concept of <line> and the beauty of meter created by internal diversity of meter contained in the poetry. Because of immatured understanding of the basic concept meter and undisputed acceptance of Japanese poetry theory, Kyeokjosi theory that presented to the poetics society with full of aspiration of free style poem could not but to receive the criticism of deterioration of the poetry theory or metrical theory. The Kyeokjosi theory of Kim Uk provides a substantial implication to the contemporary free style poem direction to move forward. When we have a glance at our contemporary free style poetry, such concerns toward Kim Uk may not be regarded as meaningless, that which path of contemporary poetry had been pursued and to what direction need to be moved forward from the view point of meter of contemporary verse. Rather, the most urgent point required in the poetical circles may be the recovery to be the poetry like of the free style poem. As sought by the Kyeokjosi theory from Kim Uk, though he might have failed, it still required to have the agony and reflection how to create the poetry to be poem- like by applying meter of ours to the free style of poem.
Abstract
The Kyeokjosi theory is the definitive work of Kim Uk's poetics theory as well as a meaningful work in the history of our Korean poetics. While exploring Kyeokjosi, Kim Uk sticked to the versification as a new paradigm of poetry which should be evaluated as a positive achievement. There is a high possibility that Kyeokjosi he was sought initially could be a free style poetry with meter enlivened in it. Specially, he had been studying on the pattern of Korean poetry from long times ago already, and it seems to have been recognized by him that what was the necessary to free style poem was the poem that has rhythm in it. Despite such positive evaluation, his Kyeokjosi theory has a clear limitation as well. The effort of Kim Uk intended to provide ideal pattern of Kyeokjosi based on the theory of the meter exposed a substantial limitation from the theory he had been sticked to. As a result he failed to find out a style of Kyeokjosi proper to us and hastily led to the frame of 7.5 phrase 12 syllables. This in turn provided a ground that Kyeokjosi was intended to imitate close to the meter of Japanese poetry. The interest of Kim Uk was to seek the most ideal Kyeokjosi, as a result of which he didn't pay much attention to the fact that Kyeokjosi has become a poetry with fixed Syllable meter. It is a clear mistake that he sought idealistic Kyeokjosi in the fixed syllabic meter. In additon, Kim Uk's Kyeokjosi theory had not gained opportunity to be developed to the discussions of the typicality of the poetry at all that goes beyond the basic unit meter or basic unit which forms standard unit of meter. That is due to the inability to understand clearly with regard to the concept of <line> and the beauty of meter created by internal diversity of meter contained in the poetry. Because of immatured understanding of the basic concept meter and undisputed acceptance of Japanese poetry theory, Kyeokjosi theory that presented to the poetics society with full of aspiration of free style poem could not but to receive the criticism of deterioration of the poetry theory or metrical theory. The Kyeokjosi theory of Kim Uk provides a substantial implication to the contemporary free style poem direction to move forward. When we have a glance at our contemporary free style poetry, such concerns toward Kim Uk may not be regarded as meaningless, that which path of contemporary poetry had been pursued and to what direction need to be moved forward from the view point of meter of contemporary verse. Rather, the most urgent point required in the poetical circles may be the recovery to be the poetry like of the free style poem. As sought by the Kyeokjosi theory from Kim Uk, though he might have failed, it still required to have the agony and reflection how to create the poetry to be poem- like by applying meter of ours to the free style of poem.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김억, "격조시형론소고 동아일보 1930. 1. 16-26일, 28-30일", ~ (1930)
- 김억, "격조시형론소고,안서김억전집" (1987), 한국문화사
- 김용직, "한국근대시사(상)" (1986), 학연사
- 김정화, "고시율격의 비교학적 연구" (2004), 보고사
- 성기옥, "한국시가율격의 이론" (1986), 새문사
- 오세영, "한국낭만주의시연구" (1980), 일지사
- 윤재근, "문예미학" (1999), 고려원
- 홍재휴, "한국고시율격연구" (1983), 태학사
- 곽명숙, "김억의 ‘조선적 시형’에 대한 고찰", 인문연구, 55(55), pp.263~290 (2008), 인문과학연구소
- 구인모, "金億의 格調詩形論에 對하여", 한국문학연구, (29), pp.263~294 (2005), 한국문학연구소
- 김권동, "岸曙 詩形에 관한 小考", 반교어문연구, 29(19), pp.157~181 (2005), 반교어문학회
- 남정희, "김억의 시형론", 반교어문연구, 9 (1998), 반교어문학회
- 박승희, "근대 초기 시의 ‘격조’와 ‘정형성’ 연구", 우리말글, 39, pp.339~362 (2007), 우리말글학회
- 장철환, "김억 시론의 리듬 의식 연구 -시형과 언어의 변모 양상을 중심으로", 어문론총, (53), pp.435~469 (2010), 한국문학언어학회
- 조동구, "안서김억연구", 박사, pp.1989
- 조용훈, "근대시의 형성과 격조시론" (1996), 새문사
- 川路柳虹, "新律格の提唱", 日本詩人, 5(3) (1925), 東京 新潮社
- 川路柳虹, "詩における內容律の否定", 日本詩人, 6(8) (1926), 東京 新潮社
- 土居光知, "詩形論 ,文學序說", pp.142~ (1927), 岩波書店
