1970년대 이강백 희곡의 메타드라마적 특성 연구 —‘드라마티스트 기법’을 중심으로—
A Study on the Meta-dramatical Characteristic of Lee Gang-baek in the 1970s — Focusing on the ‘Dramatist Technique
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper analyzed dramas written by Lee Gang-baek in the 1970s using the concept of ‘dramatist’, meta-dramatical technique. His drama Works were F ive, Three, Egg, W atchma n, N ae - ma, C haos a n d Order i n the museum, G ae - P pul ( dog’s hor n) . Dramaist in Lee Gang-baek’s 1970s drama works could be categorized into three types The first type of dramatist showed a philosophical perception based on self-consciousness with the ‘Theatrum mudi’. ‘Ra’ in F ive , ‘Da’ in Three , ‘Nae-ma’ in N ae - ma were the types. They developed self-consciousness by repeatedly experiencing the same situation and realized the limits and tragedies of human beings. The works of this type of dramatist were covered in a political drama, but they essentially dealt with human beings and internal reflection. The second type of dramatists confronted another dramatist in the drama. Citizen ‘Ra’ in Egg , ‘Da’ in W atchma n were the types. They had skepticism of the power and tried to uncover the world's darkness, but eventually fell into a victim. It was because these works were reflecting the era in which individuals with convictions inevitably lost their against with the world, and in this respect, their defeat was already scheduled. The last type of dramatists led the crowd to change. ‘Sun-u’ in C haos a n d Order i n the museum , ‘He’ in G ae - P pul were the types. They seemed to have been defeated by the world on the surface, but through the defeat and sacrifice, they changed the crowd and further led to the victory of the people. It was at this point that it was throwing a strong social message as a political drama. The characters who led the drama in Lee Gang-baek’s drama showed various aspects as a dramatist, from a philosophical investigator, an accuser of the world, to a savior of the people. This could be said to be the result of the philosophical consideration of the human existence of the playwright Lee Gang-baek, the problem consciousness of the times and society, and his worldview as a playwright.
Abstract
This paper analyzed dramas written by Lee Gang-baek in the 1970s using the concept of ‘dramatist’, meta-dramatical technique. His drama Works were F ive, Three, Egg, W atchma n, N ae - ma, C haos a n d Order i n the museum, G ae - P pul ( dog’s hor n) . Dramaist in Lee Gang-baek’s 1970s drama works could be categorized into three types The first type of dramatist showed a philosophical perception based on self-consciousness with the ‘Theatrum mudi’. ‘Ra’ in F ive , ‘Da’ in Three , ‘Nae-ma’ in N ae - ma were the types. They developed self-consciousness by repeatedly experiencing the same situation and realized the limits and tragedies of human beings. The works of this type of dramatist were covered in a political drama, but they essentially dealt with human beings and internal reflection. The second type of dramatists confronted another dramatist in the drama. Citizen ‘Ra’ in Egg , ‘Da’ in W atchma n were the types. They had skepticism of the power and tried to uncover the world's darkness, but eventually fell into a victim. It was because these works were reflecting the era in which individuals with convictions inevitably lost their against with the world, and in this respect, their defeat was already scheduled. The last type of dramatists led the crowd to change. ‘Sun-u’ in C haos a n d Order i n the museum , ‘He’ in G ae - P pul were the types. They seemed to have been defeated by the world on the surface, but through the defeat and sacrifice, they changed the crowd and further led to the victory of the people. It was at this point that it was throwing a strong social message as a political drama. The characters who led the drama in Lee Gang-baek’s drama showed various aspects as a dramatist, from a philosophical investigator, an accuser of the world, to a savior of the people. This could be said to be the result of the philosophical consideration of the human existence of the playwright Lee Gang-baek, the problem consciousness of the times and society, and his worldview as a playwright.
참고문헌 (22)
- 이강백, "이강백 희곡전집 1" (2001), 평민사
- 이강백, "이강백 희곡전집 2" (2004), 평민사
- 김남석, "1970년대 이강백 희곡 연구-군중과 권력의 상관성을 중심으로", 어문논집, 43, pp.417~ (2001), 안암어문학회
- 김미선, "수용 미학의 관점에서 본 희곡 <파수꾼>", 한국극예술연구, (29), pp.183~216 (2009), 한국극예술학회[DOI]
- 김성희, "연극의 사회학, 희곡의 해석학" (1995), 문예마당
- 김성희, "한국 동시대 극작가들", pp.98~ (2015), 박문사
- 김성희, "한국현역극작가연구", pp.96~ (1994), 예니
- 김성희, "한국 정치극 연구(1)- 박정희 정권시대(1961~1979)를 중심으로 -", 한국극예술연구, (18), pp.235~277 (2003), 한국극예술학회
- 김영희, "이강백 초기 희곡의 우화적 구조", 우암어문논집, 2, pp.155~167 (1992), 부산외국어대 국어국문학과
- 김지연, "한국 현대극의 메타드라마적 특성 연구 : 이근삼, 최인훈, 이현화, 이윤택의 희곡을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2016
- 르네 지라르, "나는 사탄이 번개처럼 떨어지는 것을 본다", pp.194~202 (2004), 문학과지성사
- 마틴 에슬린, "드라머의 해부", pp.23~ (1993), 청하
- 배봉기, "이강백론 : 정치적 알레고리를 중심으로 초기 희곡연구", 현대문학의 연구, 10, pp.309~333 (1998), 한국문학연구학회
- 백현미, "이강백 희곡의 반복 구조와 반복의 철학", 한국극예술연구, 9, pp.239~ (1999), 한국극예술학회
- 신아영, "이강백 희곡에 나타난 현실과 우화의 상관관계 연구", 한국문예창작, 5(2), pp.9~30 (2006), 한국문예창작학회
- 이강백, "당선소감 영원한 수인의 의무를 다 했을 뿐", 동아일보, 1971.1.7., ~ (1971)
- 이강백, "이강백 희곡전집 3", pp.5~ (1999), 평민사
- 이영미, "이강백 연구" (1995), 한국예술종합학교 한국예술연구소
- 정현경, "개인과 국가의 길항과 주체의 위기 - 1970년대 희곡 「파수꾼」과 「우리들끼리만의 한번」을 중심으로 -", 현대문학이론연구, (60), pp.537~560 (2015), 현대문학이론학회
- 조은정, "이강백 희곡 <파수꾼> 연구 - 군중을 통해 바라본 권력의 메커니즘 -", 한국극예술연구, (52), pp.93~122 (2016), 한국극예술학회[DOI]
- 한상철, "한국연극의 쟁점과 반성", pp.264~ (1994), 현대미학사
- Abel, Lionel, "Metatheatre: A New View of Dramatic Form", pp.49~ (1963), Hill and Wang
