본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이현화의 「키리에」에 나타난 ‘친일’과 기억의 문제

The matter of ‘Pro-Japanese’ and the reconstruction of memory in Lee Hyun-hwa's drama,「Kyrie」

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

「Kyrie」 written by Lee Hyun-hwa decisively brings up questions about the approach to history which was dichotomized into ‘Pro-Japanese’ versus ‘Anti-Japanese’ and its authority. Also, having restored the personal memories that contravened the formal history, her works show that the history can be newly reconstituted, not as by the fixed reality. But, this much cannot completely affirm the entire work. It is because that the memory of an individual, called ‘Kaneyama’ in the drama, is taken into as meaningful ‘Perjurious Behavior’ and realigned under the name of the nation again, although the individual’s memory boldly betrays the dominant dichotomy of historical understanding. And, the writer justifies such process as the ‘Great Behavior.’Furthermore, 「Kyrie」 is based on the history, however, it directly reminds the contemporary form of social behavior. This work was written on the ground of the career of a real person who was in the frame of ‘Pro-Japanese Group’, and was presented to the public during the time when the issues related to ‘Past Settlement’ had social repercussion. Therefore, 「Kyrie」 can be regarded as the work that raises meaningful questions about ‘Pro-Japanese’ while having a danger of beautifying the past affairs, or of hiding the truth from people.

Abstract

「Kyrie」 written by Lee Hyun-hwa decisively brings up questions about the approach to history which was dichotomized into ‘Pro-Japanese’ versus ‘Anti-Japanese’ and its authority. Also, having restored the personal memories that contravened the formal history, her works show that the history can be newly reconstituted, not as by the fixed reality. But, this much cannot completely affirm the entire work. It is because that the memory of an individual, called ‘Kaneyama’ in the drama, is taken into as meaningful ‘Perjurious Behavior’ and realigned under the name of the nation again, although the individual’s memory boldly betrays the dominant dichotomy of historical understanding. And, the writer justifies such process as the ‘Great Behavior.’Furthermore, 「Kyrie」 is based on the history, however, it directly reminds the contemporary form of social behavior. This work was written on the ground of the career of a real person who was in the frame of ‘Pro-Japanese Group’, and was presented to the public during the time when the issues related to ‘Past Settlement’ had social repercussion. Therefore, 「Kyrie」 can be regarded as the work that raises meaningful questions about ‘Pro-Japanese’ while having a danger of beautifying the past affairs, or of hiding the truth from people.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 서연호, "이현화 희곡․시나리오 전집 3" (2007), 연극과 인간
  2. 김동춘, "한국 과거청산의 성격과 방향, In 진실과 정의의 회복을 위하여: 과거청산운동의현재, 개념, 과제" (2005), 한국학술정보
  3. 김무용, "전봉덕-화려한 경력으로 위장한 친일경찰의 본색,친일파 99인", 돌베개, 2 (1993), 반민족연구소
  4. 김민철, "기억을 둘러싼 투쟁" (2006), 아세아문화사
  5. 김영목, "기억과 망각 사이의 역사드라마와 과거 구성:기억과 망각" (2003), 책세상
  6. 백소연, "1970-80년대 역사극 연구", 박사, pp.2011
  7. 서명수, "연극에서의 메타 의사소통:기호와 해석" (1998), 문학과 지성사
  8. 민중의 나라, "지배자의 국가", pp.2010, 서중석
  9. 손화숙, "이현화의 「키리에」-상상력과 놀이로서의 역사:예술세계" (1995), 한국예술문화단체총연합회
  10. 심우일, "이현화 희곡 연구", 석사, pp.2011
  11. 윤해동, "식민지 근대의 패러독스" (2007), 휴머니스트
  12. 윤해동, "근대역사학의 황혼" (2010), 책과함께
  13. 이양숙, "해방기 문학비평에 나타난 ‘기억’의 정치학 -1945~1948년 <문학가동맹>을 중심으로", 한국현대문학연구, (28), pp.281~307 (2009), 한국현대문학회
  14. 전진성, "역사가 기억을 말하다" (2005), 휴먼니스트
  15. 전혜린, "그리고 아무 말도 하지 않았다" (1966), 동아PR연구소출판부
  16. 안느 위베르스펠트, "연극기호학" (1998), 문학과 지성사
  17. 발터 벤야민, "발터벤야민의 문예이론" (1983), 민음사
  18. 케이스 젠킨스, "누구를 위한 역사인가" (1999), 혜안
  19. 요네야마 리사, "기억의 미래화에 대해서:내셔널 히스토리를 넘어서" (1999), 삼인

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)