한국과 일본의 원자력안전에 관한 거버넌스 비교‒경상북도 경주 월성1원전과 이바라키현 동해 제2원전사례를 중심으로‒

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the changes of nuclear safety governance and the direction of nuclear safety governance through the comparative analysis of actual cases of the governance operation of nuclear power plants in Korea and Japan after the Fukushima nuclear accident. Recently, It showed that the government, local governments, local residents, and business owners have not yet reached sufficient social agreements. Recently,It showed that the social consensus about the nuclear power plant have not yet reached sufficient social agreements the process of expressing opinions of the government, local governments, local residents, and business owners in response to the problem of restarting and extension of the operation period the Togai-mura No. 2 nuclear power plant in Japan and the activities of the Public Relations Committee on the suspension of the construction of the No. 5 and No. 6 Shin-Kori Nuclear Power Plant, and the activities of the private verification team for Wolseong No.1 in Gyeongju in Korea. These activities also indicate that local residents are increasingly demanding participation in social discussions on nuclear power plant safety. Therefore, in order to resolve various conflicts through these discussions, it is necessary to obtain sufficient social consensus among stakeholders such as the government, local governments, local residents, and business operators. For this, I would like to propose the following three measures. First, it should be operated as cooperative governance in which governments, local governments and residents can participate. Second, it must be operated transparently in order to obtain the procedural justification of stakeholders. Third, it should be operated as a governance that is jointly responsible for results.