근대전환기 연설체 서사의 서술 전략 - 양식적 독립 가능성에 대한 고찰을 중심으로 -
The narrative strategy of oratorical narrative in the transition period to modern ear -reflecting on the possibility of having an independent literature type-
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
If the role of transition period is considered as serving as bridge between pre-modern and modern eras only, it would have no choice but to explain various attempts and new types of literature in the period based on the eras. This paper has a different viewpoint and aims to find the type of narrative literature representing the period. If literature in a period is to exist on its own, it should have distinct narratives internally and reflect the reality of the period to the full externally. In that sense, the types of literature in the transition period, which have mentioned in other papers so far, have certain limitations. A mixture of types -narratives with various attributes under the name of new novel(shin-soseol), old novel(go-soseol) printed with movable type, short narrative, and historical and biographical novels- is hard to have distinctiveness representing a period. Oratorical narrative, however, is clearly different from the narratives in other times. The reasons are: first, it is distinctively used only in the transition period not in pre-modern and modern eras; and second, its "thematic awareness" clearly reflects the uniqueness of the time. That is why oratorical narrative needs to get attention as the one representing the period.
Abstract
If the role of transition period is considered as serving as bridge between pre-modern and modern eras only, it would have no choice but to explain various attempts and new types of literature in the period based on the eras. This paper has a different viewpoint and aims to find the type of narrative literature representing the period. If literature in a period is to exist on its own, it should have distinct narratives internally and reflect the reality of the period to the full externally. In that sense, the types of literature in the transition period, which have mentioned in other papers so far, have certain limitations. A mixture of types -narratives with various attributes under the name of new novel(shin-soseol), old novel(go-soseol) printed with movable type, short narrative, and historical and biographical novels- is hard to have distinctiveness representing a period. Oratorical narrative, however, is clearly different from the narratives in other times. The reasons are: first, it is distinctively used only in the transition period not in pre-modern and modern eras; and second, its "thematic awareness" clearly reflects the uniqueness of the time. That is why oratorical narrative needs to get attention as the one representing the period.
참고문헌 (16)
- 권순긍, "1910년대 활자본 구소설 연구", 박사, pp.1990
- 김복순, "1910년대 한국문학과 근대성" (1999), 소명출판사
- 김재영, "근대 계몽기 소설 인식의 한 양상", 국어국문학, (143), pp.431~456 (2006), 국어국문학회
- 김종수, "한국근대소설의 정치적 담론 수용 양상 연구", 현대문학이론연구, 13 (2000)
- 김현실, "1910년대 단편소설 연구", 박사, pp.1989
- 김형중, "애국계몽기 신문연재소설 연구-대한매일신보의 토론체소설을 중심으로", 어문연구, 101 (1999), 한국어문교육연구회
- 배정상, "근대계몽기 토론체 서사의 특질과 그 위상", 현대소설연구, (28), pp.7~27 (2005), 한국현대소설학회
- 송명진, "개화기 대화체 서사와 계몽의 수사학", 시학과 언어학, 12 (2006)
- 심재숙, "근대계몽기 신작 고소설의 현실대응양상 연구", 박사, pp.2000
- 양문규, "‘슬픈모순’과 1910년대 비판적 사실주의의 문제", 창작과비평 (1990)
- 양문규, "1910년대 한국 소설 연구", 박사, pp.1991
- 양문규, "1910년대 소설 in: 한국근현대문학연구입문" (1990), 한길사
- 이은숙, "신작구소설 연구" (2000), 국학자료원
- 최선욱, "금수회의록과 경세종의 비교 연구", 한국언어문학, 30 (1992)
- 최시한, "현상윤의 장르의식", 서강어문, 3 (1983)
- 한기형, "한국 근대소설사의 시각" (1999), 소명출판사