본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

50년대 유종호론 -페허 위에 비평의 새 집 짓기-

The Theory of Yu, Jong-ho in the 1950's -Building a New House of Criticism on the Rubbles of the Past

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

In 1950s, many professional critics appear. Their activities are summarized as positioning as new criticism. Among these new generation critics, Yu, Jong-ho reviews the position of criticism which should be responsible for the literature in a new perspective, and emphasizes the spirit of criticism as an intellectual reflection. This reflects Yu's views that criticism should participate as an alternative writing to solve the problems during the time. Yu's argument was similar to building a strict and firm new house on the rubbles of the post-war ear in the 1950s. This was because the ruins of the generation shared similar traits with the non-existence of genres. Yu was the first critic to provide an opportunity to reconfigure the basics of the criticism by recognizing that his generation lacked literalism in the era of no professional criticism. Yu's view was that the duty of critics was to contribute by communicating with the world through interpreting complex literature, and that this recreated criticism into a creative criticism. At this point, he argued that criticism should position itself as rebelling against the violence during the 1950s when the society forced people to take sides. This means that criticism should stand against violence by maintaining balanced views as a language of moderation in the era of forcing people to be purist or participants. Yu's methodology of criticism is concluded as his interest on literature language itself, and this literature language means aboriginal mother language. In this case, mother language is not defined as regional Korean language, but encompasses Chinese characters with long history. The final destination of literature language he wanted to reach was works which could depict Korean literature language's aesthetic culmination; for poems, it can be created through musicality, and sincerity for proses. Yu configured the position of the critics in the field of writers who create communication as the language of moderation, and sought for a real modernization by expanding the boundaries of language which were the objects of criticism. At this point, literature should possess truth, and through this sincerity can be achieved. Through this analytic view on the actual criticism on literature, he has shown an good example of literature which the generation should pursue. The writers who fall into Yu's selective standards include Kim, So-wol, Jeong-Ji-yong, Seo, Jeong-joo, Yun, Dong-joo, Hwang, Soon-won, and Sohn, Chang-sup.

Abstract

In 1950s, many professional critics appear. Their activities are summarized as positioning as new criticism. Among these new generation critics, Yu, Jong-ho reviews the position of criticism which should be responsible for the literature in a new perspective, and emphasizes the spirit of criticism as an intellectual reflection. This reflects Yu's views that criticism should participate as an alternative writing to solve the problems during the time. Yu's argument was similar to building a strict and firm new house on the rubbles of the post-war ear in the 1950s. This was because the ruins of the generation shared similar traits with the non-existence of genres. Yu was the first critic to provide an opportunity to reconfigure the basics of the criticism by recognizing that his generation lacked literalism in the era of no professional criticism. Yu's view was that the duty of critics was to contribute by communicating with the world through interpreting complex literature, and that this recreated criticism into a creative criticism. At this point, he argued that criticism should position itself as rebelling against the violence during the 1950s when the society forced people to take sides. This means that criticism should stand against violence by maintaining balanced views as a language of moderation in the era of forcing people to be purist or participants. Yu's methodology of criticism is concluded as his interest on literature language itself, and this literature language means aboriginal mother language. In this case, mother language is not defined as regional Korean language, but encompasses Chinese characters with long history. The final destination of literature language he wanted to reach was works which could depict Korean literature language's aesthetic culmination; for poems, it can be created through musicality, and sincerity for proses. Yu configured the position of the critics in the field of writers who create communication as the language of moderation, and sought for a real modernization by expanding the boundaries of language which were the objects of criticism. At this point, literature should possess truth, and through this sincerity can be achieved. Through this analytic view on the actual criticism on literature, he has shown an good example of literature which the generation should pursue. The writers who fall into Yu's selective standards include Kim, So-wol, Jeong-Ji-yong, Seo, Jeong-joo, Yun, Dong-joo, Hwang, Soon-won, and Sohn, Chang-sup.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. "기본자료(50년대 유종호의 글)", ~
  2. 유종호, "승리와 패배", 세대, 27 (1955)
  3. 유종호, "난해성에 대하여", 문학, 1 (1956), 서울대
  4. 유종호, "불모의 도식", 문학예술 (1957)
  5. 유종호, "언어의 유곡", 문학예술 (1957)
  6. 유종호, "비평의 반성", 현대문학 (1958)
  7. 유종호, "7월의 창작평-인상", 사상계, 61 (1958)
  8. 유종호, "산문정신고", 현대문학 (1958)
  9. 유종호, "고언이설", 사상계, 63, pp.10~11 (1958)
  10. 유종호, "비평의 문제들", 현대문학, 48 (1958)
  11. 유종호, "사고의 변혁을 위하여, 한국일보, 1959,1월", ~ (1959)
  12. 유종호, "작가, 창조, 현실", 현대문학, 51 (1959)
  13. 유종호, "인간 모멸의 진서", 사상계, 69 (1959)
  14. 유종호, "4월의 소설평- 도피, 도주, 현실부정, 한국일보, 1959, 4.23-24", ~ (1959)
  15. 유종호, "5월의 창작평-사실, 세태, 저항, 한국일보", ~ (1959)
  16. 유종호, "8월 소설평 - 허풍없는 인간 관찰을, 한국일보, 1959, 8.10-11", ~ (1959)
  17. 유종호, "모멸과 연민 - 손창섭론월", 현대문학, 57 (1959)
  18. 유종호, "9월의 소설평, 더욱 현실에 밀착하기, 한국일보,1959,9.14-15", ~ (1959)
  19. 유종호, "10월 소설평-현실의 단상, 한국일보, 1959, 10.16-17", ~ (1959)
  20. 유종호, "11월 소설평-퇴행현상의 지양을, 한국일보 1959, 11.17", ~ (1959)
  21. 유종호, "토착어의 인간상", 현대문학 (1959)
  22. 유종호, "전통의 확립을 위하여", 세계 (1960)
  23. 유종호, "비속의 미학", 현대문학, 60 (1960)
  24. 유종호, "한국의 슬픔", 현대문학 (1960)
  25. 구인환, "한국 전후문학연구" (1995), 삼지원
  26. 김세령, "1950년대 비평의 독립성과 전문화 연구", 박사, pp.2005
  27. 김영민, "한국현대문학비평사" (2000), 소명
  28. 김윤식, "유종호론-언어, 고전, 인문주의, 한국현대비평가 연구" (1996), 강
  29. 남원진, "1950년대 비평의 이해" (2001), 역락
  30. 박연희, "1960년대 외국문학 전공자 그룹과 김현 비평", 국제어문, 40(40), pp.291~320 (2007), 국제어문학회
  31. 반경환, "한국문학비평의 혁명-유종호의 문학비평", 현대시 (1995)
  32. 송현호, "유종호의 절충주의ㅡ 문학론" (1995), 국학자료 원
  33. 유종호, "한국문학, 무엇이 문제인가" (1977), 전예원
  34. 유종호, "1950년대와 한국문학", 작가연구, (창간) (1996)
  35. 유종호, "유종호 전집 1-5" (1995), 민음사
  36. 유종호, "비평50년 , 한국현대문학 50년" (1995), 민음사
  37. 이성우, "시를 어떻게 만날 것인가" (2005), 작가
  38. 이광호, "인간과 문학의 전면적 진실-유종호 ,환멸의 신화" (1995), 민음사
  39. 이명재, "변혁기의 한국문학" (1990), 문학세계사
  40. 이정민, "유종호 비평연구", 석사, pp.2003
  41. 임영봉, "한국현대문학 비평사론" (2000)
  42. 전기철, "한국 전후 문예비평 연구" (1994)
  43. 정명교, "유종호 깊이 읽기" (2006), 민음사
  44. 한기, "대가 비평의 초상: 강단 비평의 운명-유종호론,합리주의의 문턱에서" (1997), 도서출판 강
  45. 한수영, "한국 현대 비평의 이념과 성격" (2000), 국학자료원
  46. 홍신성, "우리문학의 논쟁사" (1985), 어문각

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)