정태용의 초기 비평 연구
A study on Tae-Yong Jung’s earlier literary criticism
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this thesis is to study Tae-Yong Jung’s earlier literary criticism with attention to the origin of his criticism and to turn out the achievement and limitation in view of criticism history. In addition, the analysis of his criticism in the context of Independence period and the 1950s were investigated and reconstructed in the meaning of criticism history. Tae-Yong Jung’s earlier literary criticism were oriented closer at the national reality and life and were to reconstruct ‘the national literature’ through full-fledged practice criticism. His early criticism sought the best ways to explore the goals of national literature, out of the conflict of Left-wing and right-wing, medium wave after the liberation. They overcame lack of ‘ethnic’ and ‘reality’ in the 1950s criticism. In particular, his criticism emphasized the subjective perception and Showed the balanced perspective on the ‘literary’ and ‘reality’. Furthermore, his practice criticism analyzed and evaluated insightfully contemporary literature as well as the past literature in point of literary history. they presented the future direction of Korea Literature. On the other hand, because Tae-Yong Jung emphasized the reality or the life of the nation, he was underestimated the young writers and critics in the 1950s, Sang Lee, gi-rim Kim. Also he revealed the real attitude of practical criticism compared to other established literary critics, but he was less professional than young critics had excellent literary theory. These critical awareness and practice had left many achievements Through ongoing critical activity. Many achievements from Tae-Yong Jung’s earlier literary criticism have influence on criticism these days and should not be overlooked with the importance of critical history.
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis is to study Tae-Yong Jung’s earlier literary criticism with attention to the origin of his criticism and to turn out the achievement and limitation in view of criticism history. In addition, the analysis of his criticism in the context of Independence period and the 1950s were investigated and reconstructed in the meaning of criticism history. Tae-Yong Jung’s earlier literary criticism were oriented closer at the national reality and life and were to reconstruct ‘the national literature’ through full-fledged practice criticism. His early criticism sought the best ways to explore the goals of national literature, out of the conflict of Left-wing and right-wing, medium wave after the liberation. They overcame lack of ‘ethnic’ and ‘reality’ in the 1950s criticism. In particular, his criticism emphasized the subjective perception and Showed the balanced perspective on the ‘literary’ and ‘reality’. Furthermore, his practice criticism analyzed and evaluated insightfully contemporary literature as well as the past literature in point of literary history. they presented the future direction of Korea Literature. On the other hand, because Tae-Yong Jung emphasized the reality or the life of the nation, he was underestimated the young writers and critics in the 1950s, Sang Lee, gi-rim Kim. Also he revealed the real attitude of practical criticism compared to other established literary critics, but he was less professional than young critics had excellent literary theory. These critical awareness and practice had left many achievements Through ongoing critical activity. Many achievements from Tae-Yong Jung’s earlier literary criticism have influence on criticism these days and should not be overlooked with the importance of critical history.
참고문헌 (55)
- 정태, "분노", 조선일보, ~ (1938)
- 정태용, "무등의 튼넬", 시림, (창간) (1939)
- 정태용, "문화통일전선론–임화씨의"문화운동의 당면임무"를 읽고", 신건설 (1945)
- 정태용, "술집", 예술부락 (1946)
- 정태용, "문학의 자유–백철, 염상섭 양씨를 박(駁)함", 조선중앙일보, ~ (1949)
- 정태용, "현금창작단의 동향", 신천지 (1949)
- 정태용, "조벽암 시집"지열"을 읽고", 새한민보, ~ (1949)
- 정태용, "손소희 저"이라기(梨羅記)"를 읽고", 자유신문, ~ (1949)
- 정태용, "리얼리즘과 형상화 문제", 국도신문, ~ (1949)
- 정태용, "생활과 언어", 국도신문, ~ (1949)
- 정태용, "필연과 자유–한하운의 시를 보고", 신천지 (1949)
- 정태용, "김유정론–니힐리즘과 문학", 예술집단 (1955)
- 정태용, "문학과 정신–도식적 관념 주의에 대하여", 한글문예 (1956)
- 정태용, "감상과 무기력–유월 창작평–", 조선일보, ~ (1956)
- 정태용, "작가의 주체성을 상실–요망되는 현실에의 능동적 자율성", 자유신문, ~ (1956)
- 정태용, "생활과 문학", 영문 (1956)
- 정태용, "십일월 창작평–불경기의 작단", 조선일보, ~ (1956)
- 정태용, "신리얼리즘의 대두–신춘문예당선작품을 중심으로", 평화신문, ~ (1957)
- 정태용, "현대와 문학적 사상", 한글문예 (1957)
- 정태용, "안이한 작가정신의 범람–최근창작의 동향", 한국일보, ~ (1958)
- 정태용, "문학의 순수성 문제", 문필 (1957)
- 정태용, "향가 부활이 오히려 가능", 현대문학 (1958)
- 정태용, "비평가의 위치", 자유문학 (1958)
- 정태용, "성"을 위요한 세대문제", 한국일보, ~ (1958)
- 정태용, "1958년 소설총관(總觀)–두 세대와 디렘마의 세계", 현대문학 (1959)
- 정태용, "새로운 실험의 단계–이월호 창작평", 서울신문, ~ (1959)
- 정태용, "문학시평", 신태양 (1959)
- 정태용, "문단시감 비평과 체험", 신태양 (1959)
- 정태용, "오월의 소설", 현대문학 (1959)
- 정태용, "저조와 침체의 현상", 서울신문, ~ (1959)
- 정태용, "유월의 소설", 현대문학 (1959)
- 정태용, "문학에 관한 단상", 신문예 (1959)
- 정태용, "칠월의 소설", 현대문학 (1959)
- 정태용, "시적 소설의 시대–반지성적 사고방식에 관하여", 한국일보, ~ (1959)
- 정태용, "팔월의 소설", 현대문학 (1959)
- 정태용, "새로운 의욕의 발동–구월호 창작평", 서울신문, ~ (1959)
- 정태용, "구월의 소설", 현대문학 (1959)
- 정태용, "시월의 소설", 현대문학 (1959)
- 정태용, "생활의 의미를 찾아–관념적 주제에서 현실적 질서에로", 자유신문, ~ (1959)
- 정태용, "작가들의 비평정신–십일월 창작월평", 서울신문, ~ (1959)
- 정태용, "신간평 김윤성 시집"바다가 보이는 산길", 현대문학 (1960)
- 정태용, "한국현대시인연구・기타" (1976), 어문각
- 강소연, "주체성 기반의 문학논리 구성과 비평적 실천; 정태용론", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (51), pp.583~612 (2007), 한민족어문학회
- 김세령, "1950년대 비평의 독립성과 전문화 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 김세령, "1950년대 한국 문학비평의 재조명" (2009), 혜안
- 김세령, "1950년대 김유정론 연구", 현대문학이론연구, (49), pp.05~32 (2012), 현대문학이론학회[DOI]
- 金承龍, "정태용의 批評文學", 석사, pp.1984
- 김용락, "정태용의 민족문학론" (1997), 실천문학
- 김유중, "중도적 비평의 전개양상–정태용론" (1995), 삼지원
- 박헌호, "50년대 비평의 성격과 민족문학론의 도정" (1993), 성균관대학교출판부
- 임규찬, "국민국가 수립과 문학적 대응 해방 직후, In 새민족문학사강좌02" (2009), 창비
- 전기철, "전통론" (1994), 국학자료원
- 전승주, "1950년대 한국 문학비평 연구", 박사, pp.2002
- 최예열, "1950년대 전후문학비평 자료" (2005), 월인
- 한수영, "민족문학론의 전개 양상, In 한국 현대비평의 이념과 성격" (2000), 국학자료원