동아시아 근대사상의 내셔널리즘과 트랜스내셔널리즘 —한중일 근대사상의 비교를 중심으로—
Nationalism and Transnationalism Found in East Asia Modern Thoughts
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently receiving the spotlight in the forum for East Asian discourses is the transnational approach in Anthropology which observes and investigates historical, philosophical, social, cultural and political phenomena, transcending the regional, national and geographical borders. To view diverse phenomena, not from the perspectives of a given nation or its citizens, from more object angle, is the objective of transnationalism. What is, then, transnationalism? Nationalism in East Asia has been dubbed statism, ethnocentrism. ultranationlism, patriotism and such in Chinese Characters, stressing the societal ideiologies of ethnic group or nation. That is the ism which seeks unity, independence and development, or the ism in pursuit of national unity and integrity. Contrary to nationalism, trans in transnationalism means ‘beyond, or transcend’, thus indicating that transnationalism refers to ‘ultra nationalism’ or ‘ultra ethnocentrism’, irrespective of one’s nation, race or domain. As one anthropological trend, ultra nationalism has only been theorized a few years ago but a number of persons whose grounds for thoughts which are ultranational and trans-regional have been many. This paper originated from such issue. This paper analyzed the adoption of Western thoughts in the middle of 19th century aforementioned in the preface, and elements of nationalistic thoughts in response to it. In addition, it discussed the possible of overcoming ‘nationalism of thoughts’, presented by Confucian scholar named Han Ki Choi in the late 19th century, the Joseon Dynasty and his ‘study of qi ’supported by eclecticism of the East and West. Next, if further analyzed ‘transnationalism of thoughts’ introduced as an antithesis to the nationalism of thoughts, while extrapolating on the 「Eclecticism of East and West」. A comparative analysis of eclectic trends, namely China’s [Jungchaesuhyongron] and Japan’s [Hwahonyangjaeron]. First it mentioned Jeosen’s [Dongdosuhgiron] of contemporary era, followed by the confician scholar named Ki Suhn Shin in the late Joseon Dynasty. He has a proponent of fusion of Western and Eastern thoughts, and it correlation with transnationailsm.
Abstract
Recently receiving the spotlight in the forum for East Asian discourses is the transnational approach in Anthropology which observes and investigates historical, philosophical, social, cultural and political phenomena, transcending the regional, national and geographical borders. To view diverse phenomena, not from the perspectives of a given nation or its citizens, from more object angle, is the objective of transnationalism. What is, then, transnationalism? Nationalism in East Asia has been dubbed statism, ethnocentrism. ultranationlism, patriotism and such in Chinese Characters, stressing the societal ideiologies of ethnic group or nation. That is the ism which seeks unity, independence and development, or the ism in pursuit of national unity and integrity. Contrary to nationalism, trans in transnationalism means ‘beyond, or transcend’, thus indicating that transnationalism refers to ‘ultra nationalism’ or ‘ultra ethnocentrism’, irrespective of one’s nation, race or domain. As one anthropological trend, ultra nationalism has only been theorized a few years ago but a number of persons whose grounds for thoughts which are ultranational and trans-regional have been many. This paper originated from such issue. This paper analyzed the adoption of Western thoughts in the middle of 19th century aforementioned in the preface, and elements of nationalistic thoughts in response to it. In addition, it discussed the possible of overcoming ‘nationalism of thoughts’, presented by Confucian scholar named Han Ki Choi in the late 19th century, the Joseon Dynasty and his ‘study of qi ’supported by eclecticism of the East and West. Next, if further analyzed ‘transnationalism of thoughts’ introduced as an antithesis to the nationalism of thoughts, while extrapolating on the 「Eclecticism of East and West」. A comparative analysis of eclectic trends, namely China’s [Jungchaesuhyongron] and Japan’s [Hwahonyangjaeron]. First it mentioned Jeosen’s [Dongdosuhgiron] of contemporary era, followed by the confician scholar named Ki Suhn Shin in the late Joseon Dynasty. He has a proponent of fusion of Western and Eastern thoughts, and it correlation with transnationailsm.
참고문헌 (16)
- 崔漢綺, "『神氣通』․『推測錄』․『運化測驗』"
- 安宗洙, "農政新編"
- 金允植, "續陰晴史"
- 한국학문헌연구소, "申箕善全集" (1981), 亞細亞文化社
- 平凡社, "哲學事典" (1989)
- 溝口雄三, "中國思想文化事典" (2003), 민족문화문고
- 佐久間象山, "渡辺山 高野長英 佐久間象山 横井小楠 橋本左内" (1971), 岩波書店
- 이광래, "근대라는 아포리아" (2007), 이학사
- 야규 마코토(柳生眞), "崔漢綺 氣學 硏究" (2008), 景仁文化社
- 유봉학, "조선후기 학계와 지식인" (1999), 신구문화사
- 이용주, "동아시아 근대사상론" (2009), 이학사
- 李光來, "한국의 서양사상 수용사" (2003), 열린책들
- 李元淳, "朝鮮西學史硏究" (1986), 一志社
- 스즈키 사다미, "일본의 문화내셔널리즘" (2008), 小花
- 박정심, "신기선(申箕善)의 ？？유학경위(儒學經緯)？？을 통해 본 동도서기론(東道西器論)의 사상적 특징(思想的 特徵)Ⅰ", 역사와 현실, (60), pp.315~343 (2006), 한국역사연구회
- 최윤수, "동도서기 논리와 민족담론의 해석", 동양철학연구, 38, pp.277~321 (2004), 동양철학연구회