西周의 번역어 창출과 중국의 유교
Nishi Amane’s translation and Chinese Confucianism
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Nishi Amane (1829-1997) is called as ‘the father of Japanese philosophy’. When evaluating Nishi Amane nowadays, the very first thing that rises in the head is the numerous Eastern Asian modern scholarship concept words, which created by himself. Therefore, this study focuses on the Eastern Asian modern scholarship concept words created by Nishi Amane and processed the discussion by putting the translation language issue, as in its ideological base and supernational ideology, in sight. That is, the discussion was developed by setting the two axis of creation procedure of Nishi Amane’s translation language and Chinese Confucianism. To develop such discussion, the text of this study mentions the influential issue on Zhuzixue and Soraigaku which became the ideological base of Nishi Amane. Subsequently, Chinese Confucianism revealed at the meet with the western scholarship at last was highlighted. Furthermore, it appointed that the translation language created by Nishi Amane himself contains Confucian ideological elements and discussed the issue of ‘Eastern Asian Modern Scholarship as in Translation’ in further. Through this, the study argued that the creation procedure of Nishi Amane’s translation language and the scholarship concept words, its result, cannot exist as not basing on the thinking method of the Confucian ideology and the concept within the text of the Confucian ideology.
Abstract
Nishi Amane (1829-1997) is called as ‘the father of Japanese philosophy’. When evaluating Nishi Amane nowadays, the very first thing that rises in the head is the numerous Eastern Asian modern scholarship concept words, which created by himself. Therefore, this study focuses on the Eastern Asian modern scholarship concept words created by Nishi Amane and processed the discussion by putting the translation language issue, as in its ideological base and supernational ideology, in sight. That is, the discussion was developed by setting the two axis of creation procedure of Nishi Amane’s translation language and Chinese Confucianism. To develop such discussion, the text of this study mentions the influential issue on Zhuzixue and Soraigaku which became the ideological base of Nishi Amane. Subsequently, Chinese Confucianism revealed at the meet with the western scholarship at last was highlighted. Furthermore, it appointed that the translation language created by Nishi Amane himself contains Confucian ideological elements and discussed the issue of ‘Eastern Asian Modern Scholarship as in Translation’ in further. Through this, the study argued that the creation procedure of Nishi Amane’s translation language and the scholarship concept words, its result, cannot exist as not basing on the thinking method of the Confucian ideology and the concept within the text of the Confucian ideology.
참고문헌 (23)
- 大久保利, "西周全集, 第1卷" (1960), 宗高書房
- 島根県立大学西周研究会, "西周と日本の近代" (2005), ぺりかん社
- 植手通有責任, "西周·加藤弘之(日本の名著34)" (1972), 中央公論社
- 成百曉, "論語集註" (1999), 傳統文化硏究會
- 周敦頤, "通書解" (2000), 청계
- 王家驊, "日本の近代化と儒学" (1998), 農文協
- 고지마 쓰요시, "사대부의 시대" (2004), 동아시아
- 高坂史郎, "新しい世界を求めて西周とオランダとの出会い, In 西周と日本の近代" (2005)
- 大久保利, "徂徠學に対する志向を述べた文, In 西周全集, 第1卷" (1960), 宗高書房
- 手島邦夫, "西周の借用語について, In 西周と日本の近代" (2005)
- 松島弘, "西周と津和野, In 西周と日本の近代" (2005)
- 井上厚史, "西周と儒教思想―「理」の解釈をめぐって, In 西周と日本の近代" (2005)
- 宇野美恵子, "西周における近代社会形成の構想―武士知識人の世界観=価値観の展開, In 西周と日本の近代" (2005)
- 鈴木登, "西周哲学の認知体系と統一科学—総合化への構図を求めて, In 西周と日本の近代" (2005)
- 李光來, "西周とPhilosophiaと西洋哲學", 近代東亞的知与韓國思想(2001-2007國外發表論文集) (2007), 島根県立大学西周研究会
- 大久保健晴, "니시 아마네(西周)의 초기 체제구상", 동양정치사상사, 2(1) (2003), 한국동양정치사상사학회
- 이광래, "일본사상사연구" (2005), 경인문화사
- 李光來, "西周とPhilosophiaと西洋哲學", 近代東亞的知与韓國思想(2001-2007國外發表論文集) (2007), 島根県立大学西周研究会
- 카토 슈이치, "메이지 초기의 번역 -왜. 무엇을, 어떻게 번역했는가", 현대문학의 연구, (24), pp.459~509 (2004), 한국문학연구학회
- 김동기, "일본의 근대와 번역", 시대와 철학, 14(2) (2003), 한국철학사상연구회
- 황성근, "니시 아마네의 근대적 번역어 '이성' 연구", 석사, pp.2006
- 崔瓊玉, "明治期 日本漢字語 造語成分에 대한 一考察", 日本文化學報, (6) (1999)
- 신현승, "德川時代의 『論語』觀과 그 학문정신 ― 古學派의 『論語』觀을 중심으로 ―", 동양철학연구, (59), pp.175~206 (2009), 동양철학연구회
