본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

日本의 近代 學術思潮와 陽明學

The trend of Japanese modern thought and Youmeigaku

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류철학

초록

Japan’s modern period is the time when the theoretical basis of the modern Japan’s imperialism, Asianism, national polity, and the Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere existed and was introduced. Among them, Kongzi and Mengzi’s advanced Confucianism, Zhuzixue started from Song Period, and Neo-confucianism(新儒敎) were introduced and transferred to Japan with Edo(江戶) era. It became one part of Japan’s spiritual history regardless of being negative or positive. Also, Neo-confucianism created Japan-styled thoughts or Japanized thoughts different from the form of China’s Neo-confucianism through Shugo(習合) process, since it was introduced to the modern Japan. At the outset, Kogaku revolted against Zhuzixue, and then Kokugaku carried on. Then, Mitogaku significantly affected the national polity of Japan’s modern period. Such thought school formed one part of Japan’s spirits. This study was intended to execute the discussion ranging from the introduction of Neo- confucianism and to the birth of Kogaku(古學). This discussion was the process which extracted the core ideological factors in the consecutive process that Zhuzixue and Yang-ming Studies of Neo- confucianism were introduced to Japan and then were re-born as the new Japanese Zhuzixue and Japanese Yang-ming Studies. Accordingly, it described the active role of Yang-ming Studies in Japan’s modernization process. Besides, how modern Japanese intellectuals understood Yang-ming Studies(陽明學) and what Yang-ming Studies was positioned in Bushido, was discussed. Finally, it was indicated that Yang-ming Studies movement was succeeded as the studies school which was vivid in Japan’s history by taking the period of Yang-ming Studies movement as the example, after Japan’s modern period. Also, in Japan’s modernization process, how much Confucianism was affected in Japan’s society as the ideological basis of Meiji or in Japan’s society after Meiji, was intensively discussed through connecting with Yang-ming Studies. Also, This paper covered the spiritual world of Kogaku appeared as the transcendence and overcoming of Chinese Sinocentrisim or Antithese. It contained the advent of Japanese spirit and the establishment of self-identity. There was the fusion of compromise and harmony. As more detailed proof, the scholarship spirits of Ito Jinsai (1627~1705), Ogyu sorai(1666~1728) and Yamaga soko (1622~1685) who were the representative men of Kogaku were examined. In their scholarship spirits, there was commonly the strong opposition against Neo-confucianism (specifically, Zhuzixue).

Abstract

Japan’s modern period is the time when the theoretical basis of the modern Japan’s imperialism, Asianism, national polity, and the Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere existed and was introduced. Among them, Kongzi and Mengzi’s advanced Confucianism, Zhuzixue started from Song Period, and Neo-confucianism(新儒敎) were introduced and transferred to Japan with Edo(江戶) era. It became one part of Japan’s spiritual history regardless of being negative or positive. Also, Neo-confucianism created Japan-styled thoughts or Japanized thoughts different from the form of China’s Neo-confucianism through Shugo(習合) process, since it was introduced to the modern Japan. At the outset, Kogaku revolted against Zhuzixue, and then Kokugaku carried on. Then, Mitogaku significantly affected the national polity of Japan’s modern period. Such thought school formed one part of Japan’s spirits. This study was intended to execute the discussion ranging from the introduction of Neo- confucianism and to the birth of Kogaku(古學). This discussion was the process which extracted the core ideological factors in the consecutive process that Zhuzixue and Yang-ming Studies of Neo- confucianism were introduced to Japan and then were re-born as the new Japanese Zhuzixue and Japanese Yang-ming Studies. Accordingly, it described the active role of Yang-ming Studies in Japan’s modernization process. Besides, how modern Japanese intellectuals understood Yang-ming Studies(陽明學) and what Yang-ming Studies was positioned in Bushido, was discussed. Finally, it was indicated that Yang-ming Studies movement was succeeded as the studies school which was vivid in Japan’s history by taking the period of Yang-ming Studies movement as the example, after Japan’s modern period. Also, in Japan’s modernization process, how much Confucianism was affected in Japan’s society as the ideological basis of Meiji or in Japan’s society after Meiji, was intensively discussed through connecting with Yang-ming Studies. Also, This paper covered the spiritual world of Kogaku appeared as the transcendence and overcoming of Chinese Sinocentrisim or Antithese. It contained the advent of Japanese spirit and the establishment of self-identity. There was the fusion of compromise and harmony. As more detailed proof, the scholarship spirits of Ito Jinsai (1627~1705), Ogyu sorai(1666~1728) and Yamaga soko (1622~1685) who were the representative men of Kogaku were examined. In their scholarship spirits, there was commonly the strong opposition against Neo-confucianism (specifically, Zhuzixue).

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 新渡??造, "武士道", 飯島正久 (1998), 築地書館
  2. 子安宣邦監修, "日本思想史辭典" (2001), ぺりかん社
  3. 多田?著, "武士道の倫理─山鹿素行の場合" (2006), 麗澤大?出版社
  4. 山下龍二, "儒?と日本" (2001), ?文社
  5. 神島二?, "近代日本の精神構造" (1961), 岩波書店
  6. 明?出版社刊行, "陽明?便?" (1974), 陽明?大系第一二?
  7. 岩波書店, "??苑 (제4판)" (1996)
  8. 金谷治編集, "荻生?徠集 (日本の思想12)" (1970), 筑摩書房
  9. 井上哲次?, "日本古學派之哲?" (1902), ?山房
  10. 井上哲次?, "日本陽明?派之哲?" (1900), 富山房
  11. 高?武次?, "日本之陽明?" (1898), ?華書院
  12. 吉田公平, "日本における陽明?" (1999), ぺりかん社
  13. 今井淳, "日本思想論爭史" (1979), ぺりかん社
  14. 宇野哲人外, "陽明?入門 (陽明?大系第一?)" (1971), 明?出版社
  15. 小島毅, "近代日本の陽明?" (2006), 講談社
  16. 小島毅, "朱子?と陽明?" (2004), 放送大??育振興?
  17. 三島由紀夫, "革命の哲?としての陽明?", 三島由紀夫全集, 34 (1976), 新潮社
  18. 源了円, "?川思想小史" (1973), 中公新書
  19. 吉川幸次郞, "仁齋??徠?宣長" (1975), 岩波書店
  20. ?祺一, "日本の近世─儒?????洋?─" (1993), 中央公論社
  21. 前田勉, "近世日本の儒?と兵?" (1996), ぺりかん社
  22. 와타나베 히로시, "주자학과 근세일본사회" (2007), 예문서원
  23. 니토베 이나조, "사무라이" (2004), 생각의 나무
  24. 고지마 쓰요시(小島毅), "사대부의 시대" (2004), 동아시아
  25. 고야스 노부쿠니(子安宣邦), "동아?대동아?동아시아" (2005), 역사비평사
  26. 요시다 고헤이(吉田公平), "일본양명학" (2004), 청계
  27. 미나모토 료엔, "도쿠가와 시대의 철학사상" (2000), 예문서원
  28. 모리모토 준이치로(守本順一郞), "일본사상사" (1988), 이론과 실천
  29. 신현승, "무사도와 양명학에 관한 소고", 日本思想, 12(1), pp.179~199 (2007), 한국일본사상사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)