후쿠자와 유키치의 번역과 외국지명의 한자 표기 연구
A Study on Fukuzawa Yukichi’s Translation and Kanji Notation of Foreign Place Names
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In connection with Fukuzawa Yukichi’s view of translation, this study examined the Kanji notation in his books written in the early Meiji Era, and compared it with that in other documents. First, place names translated into the same Kanji notations are found in all of Fukuzawa Yukichi’s books, among place names that had comparatively long been translated into Kanji. Second, in each book, translation of one place name into two or three Kanji notations shows the intention to gather various notations together; and on the other hand it demonstrates the view of translation trying to reflect the diversity of Kanji notation. Third, the place names translated by coining Kanji characters represent a positive aspect that it enabled early modern Japanese people to have easy access to the Western world. On the other hand, it shows limitations that the Kanji notations that were coined by excessively relying on the colloquial style did not play a proper role as Kanji characters representing the place names. Fourth, the comparison shows that the two documents have relatively similar notation pattern. However, since there is mixed use of Japanesestyle Chinese characters and Chinesestyle of Chinese characters even in the same document depending on the translator, it confirms the transitional period of natation of place names.
Abstract
In connection with Fukuzawa Yukichi’s view of translation, this study examined the Kanji notation in his books written in the early Meiji Era, and compared it with that in other documents. First, place names translated into the same Kanji notations are found in all of Fukuzawa Yukichi’s books, among place names that had comparatively long been translated into Kanji. Second, in each book, translation of one place name into two or three Kanji notations shows the intention to gather various notations together; and on the other hand it demonstrates the view of translation trying to reflect the diversity of Kanji notation. Third, the place names translated by coining Kanji characters represent a positive aspect that it enabled early modern Japanese people to have easy access to the Western world. On the other hand, it shows limitations that the Kanji notations that were coined by excessively relying on the colloquial style did not play a proper role as Kanji characters representing the place names. Fourth, the comparison shows that the two documents have relatively similar notation pattern. However, since there is mixed use of Japanesestyle Chinese characters and Chinesestyle of Chinese characters even in the same document depending on the translator, it confirms the transitional period of natation of place names.
참고문헌 (18)
- 金敬鎬, "漢字表記에 의해 形成된 外國地名의 考察", 5, pp.257~279 (1998), 人文社會硏究所
- 박성희, "『特命全権大使 米欧回覧実記 』에 나타나는 서양 지명 표기에 관한 연구 -후쿠자와 유키치 자료와의 비교를 중심으로-", 일본근대학연구, (39), pp.29~49 (2013), 한국일본근대학회
- 이자호, "『附音揷圖英和字彙』의 외국 지명 표기", 일어일문학연구, 68(1), pp.183~200 (2009), 한국일어일문학회
- 이한섭, "西遊見聞에 나타난 外國地名 및 人名의 漢字表記에 대하여日本式 表記와의 관련성을 중심으로", 일본어학연구, 1(12), pp.185~201 (1999)
- 정영숙, "西遊見聞에 나타난 外國 地名의 漢字 表記에 대하여日本・中國과의 比較를 中心으로", 日本學報, 41, pp.129~139 (1998)
- 정선태, "근대의 어둠을 응시하는 고양이의 시선 번역・문학・사상", pp.61~78 (2006), 소명출판
- 황미정, "『西立志編』における外國地名の表記實態", 일본어학연구, (21), pp.169~183 (2008), 한국일본어학회
- 上野力, "明治初期の外国地名表記", 常葉学園短期大学紀要, 13, pp.23~30 (1981)
- 宇喜多小十, "增補懷中節用無盡藏" (1885), 内藤半七等
- 於菟子, "啓蒙智慧之環" (1875), 瓜生
- 中村正直, "西國立志編" (1878), 博文館
- 斎藤毅, "明治のことば", pp.236~252 (2005), 講談社學術文庫
- 進藤咲子, "語彙と文章", pp.174~245 (1981), 明治書院
- 福沢諭吉, "福沢全集緒言 第12巻", pp.408~416 (2003), 応義塾大学出版会
- 丸山真男, "翻訳と日本の近代", pp.149~183 (1998), 岩波新書
- 山本政秀, "近代文体発生の史的研究", pp.104~117 (1965), 岩波書店
- 魏源, "海國圖志" (1847), 古徵堂
- 徐繼余, "壁星泉・劉玉坡鑑定總理衛門藏版" (1849)
