한국어의 수정 화행과 수정 유도 표현 - TV 토론 텍스트를 중심으로 -
Repair and Repair Initiator in Korean Language
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
‘Repair’ is the speech act which revises a former discourse when it has a trouble source, and ‘repair initiator’ is the expression which initiates a repair or let hearers know that a repair will occur. ‘Repair’ is a face-threatening act as it presupposes that the former discourse was repairable. That is why types of ‘repair’ and ‘repair initiator’ are affected by the situation of the discourse, the speakers' characteristics and the speakers' relations, etc.. So the types of ‘repair’ and ‘repair initiator’ play a key role in the appropriateness of repair. This study revises previous studies and aims to divide types of ‘repair’ and ‘repair initiator’ in Korean language based on examples seen in TV discussion texts. The types of ‘repair’ are divided by the speaker who initiates it and the speaker who performs it as well as by its objects and functions. The types of ‘repair initiator’ are divided into ‘direct repair initiator’ and ‘indirect repair initiator’. These type divisions can help us to understand what types of repair and repair initiator are used in Korean language and what functions they have.
Abstract
‘Repair’ is the speech act which revises a former discourse when it has a trouble source, and ‘repair initiator’ is the expression which initiates a repair or let hearers know that a repair will occur. ‘Repair’ is a face-threatening act as it presupposes that the former discourse was repairable. That is why types of ‘repair’ and ‘repair initiator’ are affected by the situation of the discourse, the speakers' characteristics and the speakers' relations, etc.. So the types of ‘repair’ and ‘repair initiator’ play a key role in the appropriateness of repair. This study revises previous studies and aims to divide types of ‘repair’ and ‘repair initiator’ in Korean language based on examples seen in TV discussion texts. The types of ‘repair’ are divided by the speaker who initiates it and the speaker who performs it as well as by its objects and functions. The types of ‘repair initiator’ are divided into ‘direct repair initiator’ and ‘indirect repair initiator’. These type divisions can help us to understand what types of repair and repair initiator are used in Korean language and what functions they have.
참고문헌 (16)
- 강소영, "구어 담화에 나타난 수정 양상 연구: 수업내용을 화제로 한 대학 강사들의 대화 중심으로", 한국어학, 32, pp.1~30 (2006), 한국어학회
- 구현정, "말실수의 유형 연구: 대중매체 텍스트를 중심으로", 사회언어학, 10(2), pp.1~24 (2002), 한국사회언어학회
- 전영옥, 구현정, 구현정, "토론에 나타난 대응쌍 연구", 담화와 인지, 10(3), pp.249~273 (2003), 담화ㆍ인지언어학회
- 김윤희, "학문적 구두발표에서의 메타언어표현에 관한 연구 : 한국어 모어화자와 외국인 유학생의 비교를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2006
- 김해연, "사회언어학에서의 담화연구", 사회언어학, 12(2), pp.105~130 (2004), 한국사회언어학회
- 박용한, "토론 대화 전략 연구" (2002), 역락
- 손희연, "수업 담화의 바로잡기 연구", 석사, pp.1998
- 유동엽, "대화 참여자의 대화 전략에 관한 연구－상호작용을 위한 대화를 중심으로", 석사, pp.1997
- 임지룡, "말실수의 인지적 분석", 문학과 언어, 17(1), pp.57~79 (1996), 문학과 언어연구회
- 최진희, "한국어 대화의 수정 유형 연구", 석사, pp.2007
- Cont, R., "Aspects of interaction in an media interview", Journal of Pragmatics, 5, pp.113~144 (1981)
- Jefferson, G., "Error correction as interactional resource", pp.181~199 (1973), Language in Society
- 김해연, "Questions as NTRIs in Detective Fiction", 텍스트언어학, 2(23), pp.339~365 (2007), 한국텍스트언어학회
- Levinson, S. C., "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Schegloff, E. A., "The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation", Language, 53, pp.361~382 (1977)
- "MBC ‘100분 토론’ 홈페이지"[URL]