한국 개념사 방법론 소고 -‘역사’ 개념을 중심으로-
An Exploratory Study on the Methodology of Korean Conceptual History-the Case of the Concept of ‘History’.
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Is it possible for concepts to serve as a witness for the modern times? This is the very question that is now guiding the modern conceptual history. According to Reinhart Koselleck, a leading practitioner in the field, ‘the modern’ is a linguistic outcome where hope and prediction toward ‘the new time’ are expressed through historical consciousness. With this outcome, there appeared an irredeemable gap between the experience of the past and the expectation toward the future. The conflict over conceptual establishment began to have social and political impact. As a result, the goal of conceptual history took shape, which is to grope for new expectation toward the future amid the collapse of traditional society. At the core of this process is the semantics of ‘Perspektivbegriffe’ which both expresses and leads the modern. One of those cases is the concept of ‘history.’ The usage of ‘history in general,’ which was expressed as singular generic before the French Revolution, came to show a coefficient of temporal change. This new concept of ‘history’represented temporal quality along with that of ‘progress’ on the horizon of abstraction and universality. In Korea, ‘history’ was accepted at first as a term referring to a foreign discipline. It soon promoted itself to a concept of movement reflecting the collapse of traditional society. ‘The present,’ which called out ‘history’ amid the crisis of imperialism,came to be considered the most important time and brought about hope and expectation breaking away from the past experience. It is noteworthy that there existed in this semantics traditional elements surviving through the formation of modern concept. In many cases, ‘history’ could not escape from the symbolism of traditional moral instruction, so it incurred a nostalgic mood and memory about the mythical age, and served as an ideological means to glamorize national characteristics. Accordingly, it is not easy to gain valuable witness for the unilinear modern times. Hence the need to find out a new heuristic principle. Modern study of metaphor may provide a clue in that Korean concept of ‘history’ contains basic meanings more than others. It will be the methodological task of Korean conceptual history to include symbolic and pictorial elements preceding the conceptual formation or underlying the base of concept.
Abstract
Is it possible for concepts to serve as a witness for the modern times? This is the very question that is now guiding the modern conceptual history. According to Reinhart Koselleck, a leading practitioner in the field, ‘the modern’ is a linguistic outcome where hope and prediction toward ‘the new time’ are expressed through historical consciousness. With this outcome, there appeared an irredeemable gap between the experience of the past and the expectation toward the future. The conflict over conceptual establishment began to have social and political impact. As a result, the goal of conceptual history took shape, which is to grope for new expectation toward the future amid the collapse of traditional society. At the core of this process is the semantics of ‘Perspektivbegriffe’ which both expresses and leads the modern. One of those cases is the concept of ‘history.’ The usage of ‘history in general,’ which was expressed as singular generic before the French Revolution, came to show a coefficient of temporal change. This new concept of ‘history’represented temporal quality along with that of ‘progress’ on the horizon of abstraction and universality. In Korea, ‘history’ was accepted at first as a term referring to a foreign discipline. It soon promoted itself to a concept of movement reflecting the collapse of traditional society. ‘The present,’ which called out ‘history’ amid the crisis of imperialism,came to be considered the most important time and brought about hope and expectation breaking away from the past experience. It is noteworthy that there existed in this semantics traditional elements surviving through the formation of modern concept. In many cases, ‘history’ could not escape from the symbolism of traditional moral instruction, so it incurred a nostalgic mood and memory about the mythical age, and served as an ideological means to glamorize national characteristics. Accordingly, it is not easy to gain valuable witness for the unilinear modern times. Hence the need to find out a new heuristic principle. Modern study of metaphor may provide a clue in that Korean concept of ‘history’ contains basic meanings more than others. It will be the methodological task of Korean conceptual history to include symbolic and pictorial elements preceding the conceptual formation or underlying the base of concept.
참고문헌 (36)
- 도면회, "국사는 어떻게 구성되었는가?- 한국 근대역사학의 창출과 통사체계의확립, In 역사학의 세기. 20세기 한국과 일본의 역사학" (2009), 휴머니스트
- 박근갑, "‘말안장 시대’의 운동개념, In 개념사의 지평과 전망", pp.31~59 (2009), 소화
- 박근갑, "단재 신채호와 역사의 발견", 역사학보, 210(210), pp.165~201 (2011), 역사학회
- 박근갑, "‘근대’의 의미론 — 라인하르트 코젤렉(Reinhart Koselleck)과 한스 블루멘베르크(Hans Blumenberg) —", 개념과 소통, (9), pp.117~147 (2012), 한림과학원
- 박양신, "근대 일본에서의 ‘국민’ ‘민족’ 개념의 형성과 전개 ― nation 개념의 수용사 ―", 동양사학연구, (104), pp.235~265 (2008), 동양사학회
- 박여성, "개념사 연구:역사서술과 언어학의 상호작용 — 구조의미론, 원형의미론 및 텍스트언어학을 중심으로 —", 개념과 소통, 9(9), pp.33~90 (2012), 한림과학원
- 박영효, "朴泳孝 上疏文(資料)", 아세아학보, 1 (1965)
- 신승하, "중국사학사" (2006), 서울
- 신채호, "단재 신채호 전집 1" (2007), 독립기념관한국독립운동사연구소
- 신채호, "단재 신채호 전집 3" (2007), 독립기념관한국독립운동사연구소
- 신채호, "단재 신채호 전집 6" (2008), 독립기념관한국독립운동사연구소
- 오항녕, "한국 사관제도 성립사" (2009), 일지사
- 유길준, "서유견문" (1969), 경인문화사
- 이진일, "개념사의 학문적 구성과 사전적 기획 사이에서 - 『코젤렉의 개념사 사전』을 중심으로 -", 개념과 소통, 7(7), pp.135~164 (2011), 한림과학원
- 전복희, "사회진화론과 국가사상. 구한말을 중심으로" (1996)
- 정용화, "문명의 정치사상" (2004), 문학과지성사
- 조동걸, "현대 한국사학사" (1998)
- 조병한, "梁啓超의 국민국가론과 民權․民族 관념(1896-1902)", 서강인문논총, 30, pp.307~373 (2007)
- 한영우, "한국 민족주의 역사학" (1996)
- 한영우, "조선후기 사학사 연구" (1998), 일지사
- 버튼 웟슨, "위대한 역사가 사마천" (1995), 한길사
- 김한식, "시간과 이야기 3" (2004), 문학과지성사
- 헨리 임, "한국의 식민지 근대성. 내재적 발전론과식민지 근대화론을 넘어서, In 한국의 식민지 근대성. 내재적 발전론과식민지 근대화론을 넘어서", pp.469~503 (2007), 삼인
- 사마광, "자치통감 1" (2007), 서울
- Blumenberg, H., "Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie" (1998), Frankfurt am Main
- Blumenberg, H., "Arbeit am Mythos" (2006), Suhrkamp Verlag
- Blumenberg, H., "Wirklichkeiten in denen wir leben" (2009), Reclam
- Brunner, O., "Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, In Historishes Lexikon zur politisch-spzialen Sprache in Deutschland, 8 vols" (1997), Klett-Cotta
- Engels, O., "Geschichte, Historie, In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historishes Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, vo. 2", pp.593~717 (1979), Klett-Cotta
- Koselleck, R., "Richtlinien für das Lexikon politisch-sozialer Begriffe der Neuzeit", Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 11 (1967)
- Koselleck, R., "Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten" (1979), Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag
- Koselleck, R., "Zeitschichten. Studien zur Historik" (2003), Suhrkamp Verlag
- Kurz, J, "Translating the Vocation of Man: Liang Qichao(1873-1929), J.G. Fichte, and the Body Politic in Early Republican Chana, In Why Concepts Matter, In Why Concepts Matter. Translating Social and Political Thought", pp.153~175 (2012)
- Weber, M., "Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre" (1982)
- 永原慶二, "20世紀日本の歷史學" (2003), 吉川弘文館
- 福澤諭吉, "福澤諭吉著作集 第 1卷( 西洋事情)" (2004), 慶應義塾大學出版會