응집성 관계와 수사구조이론의 인과성과 주관성에 대한 비교 연구
Comparative research on causality and subjectivity of coherence relations and rhetorical structure theory
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purposes of this study are to introduce scalingcausal relations based on subjectivity in classification of coherencerelations, to compare scaling causal relations to rhetorical relations inrhetorical structure theory for getting theoretical validity, and to findtheoretical complement for setting taxonomy. The scale of subjectivitycan be classified as non-volitional causal, volitional causal, causalitybasedepistemic, noncausal epistemic, and speech-act relations. Meanwhile,rhetorical relations on scale of subjectivity can be analyzed asNon-volitional cause, Volitional cause, Non-volitional result, Volitionalresult, Evidence, Motivation, and Justify relations. Through thiscomparison, first, coherence relations of non-volitional and volitionalrelations can be divided with (Non-)volitional cause(result) and(Non-)volitional cause(result) respectively in rhetorical structure theory. Second, it is hard to distinguish causality-based epistemic relations fromnoncausal epistemic relations in rhetorial relations. Finally, rhetoricalrelations corresponded with speech-act relations of coherence relationsare confirmed to have only justify relations.
Abstract
The purposes of this study are to introduce scalingcausal relations based on subjectivity in classification of coherencerelations, to compare scaling causal relations to rhetorical relations inrhetorical structure theory for getting theoretical validity, and to findtheoretical complement for setting taxonomy. The scale of subjectivitycan be classified as non-volitional causal, volitional causal, causalitybasedepistemic, noncausal epistemic, and speech-act relations. Meanwhile,rhetorical relations on scale of subjectivity can be analyzed asNon-volitional cause, Volitional cause, Non-volitional result, Volitionalresult, Evidence, Motivation, and Justify relations. Through thiscomparison, first, coherence relations of non-volitional and volitionalrelations can be divided with (Non-)volitional cause(result) and(Non-)volitional cause(result) respectively in rhetorical structure theory. Second, it is hard to distinguish causality-based epistemic relations fromnoncausal epistemic relations in rhetorial relations. Finally, rhetoricalrelations corresponded with speech-act relations of coherence relationsare confirmed to have only justify relations.
참고문헌 (18)
- 박정운, "한국어 조건문의 인식태도", 담화와 인지, 13(2), pp.109~132 (2006), 담화·인지언어학회
- E. Sweetser, "어원론에서 화용론까지" (2006), 박이정
- 안미경, "Causality and Subjectivity: With reference to English causal complex prepositions", 담화와 인지, 16(1), pp.45~61 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회
- 이소현, "한국어 연결어미 '-는데'의 의미 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과 외국어로서의한국어교육전공, pp.2012
- 이해윤, "CONSTRUCTING AN ONTOLOGY OF COHERENCE RELATIONS: AN EXAMPLE OF ‘CAUSAL RELATION’", 언어학, 54(54), pp.41~59 (2009), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 최승기, "수사구조이론을 활용한 논증적 텍스트의 구조 분석 : 정당논평 텍스트를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2013
- Azar, M., "Concession Relations as Argumentation", TEXT, 17, pp.301~316 (1997)
- Maat, H. P., "Scaling causal relations and connectives in terms of speaker involvement", Cognitive linguistics, 12(3), pp.211~246 (2001)
- Maat, H. P., "Domains of use or subjectivity? The distribution of three Dutch causal connectives explained", TOPICS IN ENGLISH LINGUISTICS, 33, pp.57~82 (2000)
- Mann, W. C., "Relational propositions in discourse", Discourse Processes, 9(1), pp.57~90 (1986)
- Mann, W. C., "Rhetorical structure theory : Towards a functional theory of text rganization", Text, 8(3), pp.243~281 (1988)
- [URL]
- Nicholas, N., "Problems in the Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory to Text Generation", Master, pp.1994
- Potter, Andrew, "Interactional coherence in asynchronous learning environment", Ph.D., pp.2007
- Sanders, T., "Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics", pp.591~595 (2006), Elsevier
- Sanders, T., "Toward a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations", Discourse Processes, 15, pp.1~35 (1992)
- Taboada, M. T., "Rhetorical structure theory: Looking back and moving ahead", Discourse Studies, 8(3), pp.423~459 (2006)
- Vis, K., "using RST to analyze subjectivity in text and talk", Applications of Cognitive Linguistics, 14, pp.291~316 (2010)