본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본의 독도무주지 선점에 관한 고찰

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This paper analyzes the oringins of Japan's claim over Dokdo based on the theory of acquired terra nullius and theory of inherent territory, and analyzes why the claim is problematic. Furthermore, this paper points out the controversy of Japan's later claim based on inherrent territory, after it faced limits regarding the former claim of acquired terra nullius. Japan's claim over Dokdo based on the theory of acquired terra nullius originated during the Russo-Japanese War when Japan secretly seized Dokdo after realizing that it was a strategically important place. After facing limitations of its claim based on theory of acquired terra nullius, Japan later referred to the theory of inherent territory, which was merely a rhetoric claim which closely resembled Korea's claim over Dokdo. Therefore, this paper points out that Japan's claim over Dokdo by mixing two theories of acquired terra nullius and inherent territory is inconsistent.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the oringins of Japan's claim over Dokdo based on the theory of acquired terra nullius and theory of inherent territory, and analyzes why the claim is problematic. Furthermore, this paper points out the controversy of Japan's later claim based on inherrent territory, after it faced limits regarding the former claim of acquired terra nullius. Japan's claim over Dokdo based on the theory of acquired terra nullius originated during the Russo-Japanese War when Japan secretly seized Dokdo after realizing that it was a strategically important place. After facing limitations of its claim based on theory of acquired terra nullius, Japan later referred to the theory of inherent territory, which was merely a rhetoric claim which closely resembled Korea's claim over Dokdo. Therefore, this paper points out that Japan's claim over Dokdo by mixing two theories of acquired terra nullius and inherent territory is inconsistent.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 이종학, "일본의 독도정책 자료집" (2000), 홍교문화사
  2. 송병기, "울릉도와 독도" (1999), 단국대학교출판부
  3. 송병기, "독도영유권자료선집" (2004), 한림대학교아시아문화선집
  4. 신용하, "독도, 보배로운 한국영토 -일본의 영유권 주장에 대한 총비판" (1996), 지식산업사
  5. 신용하, "독도영유권자료의 연구 제2권" (1999), 독도연구보전협회
  6. 최장근, "일본영토의 분쟁" (1998), 백산자료원
  7. 최장근, "독도문제의 본질과 일본의 영토분쟁 정치학" (2009), 제이앤씨
  8. 곽진오, "시마네현(島根縣) 告示40호와 일본의 독도인식 한계", 한일군사문화연구, 13, pp.149~174 (2012), 한일군사문화학회[DOI]
  9. 奥原碧雲, "竹島及鬱陵島" (1906), ハーベスト出版
  10. 川上健三, "竹島の歴史地理学的研究" (1966), 古今書院
  11. 内藤正中, "竹島=獨島論爭 歴史資料から考える" (2007), 新幹社
  12. 内藤正中, "竹島ㆍ獨島=史的檢證" (2007), 岩波書店
  13. 内藤正中, "竹島=獨島問題入門 日本外務省竹島批判" (2008), 新幹社
  14. "日本國會議事錄 外務法務委員會連合審議會 1號", ~
  15. 梶村秀樹, "竹島=獨島問題と日本国家 (付ㆍ資料)", 朝鮮研究 (1978)
  16. 外務省, "日本外交年表並主要文書 上 明治百年史叢書1" (1976), 原書房
  17. 高野雄一, "日本の領土" (1962), 東京大学出版会
  18. 毎日新聞社, "対日平和条約" (1952), 毎日新聞社
  19. 水津満, "北方領土の鍵" (1987), 謙光社
  20. "日本外務省 홈페이지"[URL]
  21. 下條正男, "竹島は日韓どちらのものか" (2006), 文藝春秋
  22. 最終報告にあたって「竹島の日」条例から二年, 「竹島問題に関する調査研究」最終報告書, "下條正男", 竹島問題研究会, ~ (2007)
  23. 池内敏, "竹島/独島と石島の比定問題・再論, In テクストの解釈学" (2012)
  24. 日本外交省, "日本外交文書 第18卷" (1970)
  25. 塚本孝, "竹島領土権をめぐる日韓両国政府の見解", レファレンス, pp.60~ (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)