후쿠시마사고와 원자력손해배상제도－배상조치액의 증액을 중심으로－
The Liability Scheme and Nuclear Accident -Lessons from Fukushima-
2
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Japanese nuclear liability regime revealed from the process of that of the Fukushima Nuclear Plant Accident, and to provide just, reasonable, and affordable lesson for Korea’s nuclear regulatory system that has similar nuclear power generation system. The goal of the liability regime ranges from not only ex-post victim relief programs, but also to ex-ante deterrence efforts are outstandingly important, especially, from the aspect of efficiency improvement of the relief system. As being said, we can rationally consider Mutual Support Scheme and/or property insurance program which is co-linked with underwriting ability to accept in addition to liability insurance itself only as well as current channeling of liability scheme that the electricity Utility, KHNP, only is responsible for accident. Along with above relief and insurance programs, we need rapid discard of the Act on Indemnity Agreement for Compensation of Nuclear Damage, which implicitly or explicitly obstructs a nuclear operator’s efforts to deter accident. Because this agreement indemnify a nuclear operator for any losses arising from the compensation nuclear damage which cannot be covered by private liability insurance contract, in exchange for payments of indemnity fee which is only one-twenty three of insurance premiums. On the other hand, in order to prepare for joining in CSC convention, I offer some suggestions that Korea’s nuclear liability regime should resolve in near future such as the abolition of the limitation of liability in amount.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Japanese nuclear liability regime revealed from the process of that of the Fukushima Nuclear Plant Accident, and to provide just, reasonable, and affordable lesson for Korea’s nuclear regulatory system that has similar nuclear power generation system. The goal of the liability regime ranges from not only ex-post victim relief programs, but also to ex-ante deterrence efforts are outstandingly important, especially, from the aspect of efficiency improvement of the relief system. As being said, we can rationally consider Mutual Support Scheme and/or property insurance program which is co-linked with underwriting ability to accept in addition to liability insurance itself only as well as current channeling of liability scheme that the electricity Utility, KHNP, only is responsible for accident. Along with above relief and insurance programs, we need rapid discard of the Act on Indemnity Agreement for Compensation of Nuclear Damage, which implicitly or explicitly obstructs a nuclear operator’s efforts to deter accident. Because this agreement indemnify a nuclear operator for any losses arising from the compensation nuclear damage which cannot be covered by private liability insurance contract, in exchange for payments of indemnity fee which is only one-twenty three of insurance premiums. On the other hand, in order to prepare for joining in CSC convention, I offer some suggestions that Korea’s nuclear liability regime should resolve in near future such as the abolition of the limitation of liability in amount.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김재화, "원자력보험의 이해" (2007), 코리안재보험주식회사
- 加藤哲朗, "原子力と冷戰" (2013), 花傳社
- 高橋康文, "原子力損害賠償支援機構法" (2012), 商事法務
- 科學技術廳原子力局, "原子力損害賠償制度" (1991), 通商産業硏究社
- 內藤奎爾, "核燃料施設の臨界事故" (2003), 原子力安全硏究協會
- 帶刀治ほか, "原子力と地域社會" (2009), 文眞堂
- 卯辰昇, "原子力損害賠償の法律問題" (2012), 金融財政事情硏究會
- 遠藤典子, "原子力損害賠償制度の硏究" (2013), 岩波書店
- 日本原子力産業協會, "原賠制度" (2012), 日本原子力産業協會
- 日本辯護士連合會, "原發事故⋅損害賠償マニュアル" (2011), 日本加除出版
- 張貞旭, "アジアの環境問題(環境經濟⋅政策學會編)" (1998), 東洋經濟新報社
- 除本理史, "原發賠償を問う" (2013), 岩波書店
- JCO臨界事故總合評價會議, "JCO臨界事故と日本の原子力行政" (2000), 七ツ 森書館
- Guido Calabresi, "THE COST OF ACCIDENTS: A Legal and Economic Analysis" (1970), Yale University Press
- 廣瀨硏吉, "世界の原子力開發における原子力損害賠償の體制と課題", 損害保險硏究, 59, pp.56~119 (1998), 損害保險事業總合硏究所
- 久保壽彦, "原子力損害賠償制度の課題", 立命館經濟學, 60(4), pp.499~516 (2011), 立命館大學
- 今井隆吉部會, "原子力損害賠償制度の現狀と課題", 21世紀フォー ラム, (100), pp.72~81 (2005), 21世紀フォーラム事務局
- 金澤良雄, "各國の原子力法", ジュリスト, (93), pp.2~5 (1955), 有斐閣
- 德常泰之, "原子力損害賠償制度(原子力保險)の適用に關する一考察", 關西大學商學論集, 57(2), pp.25~42 (2012), 關西大學
- 大羽宏一, "原子力災害と原子力損害賠償責任保險", 大分大學經濟 論集, 51(6), pp.21~47 (2000), 大分大學
- 卯辰昇, "原子力損害賠償違法における責任集中原則と國家補償", 損 害保險硏究, 74(1), pp.111~150 (2012), 損害保險事業總合硏究所
- 有林浩二, "原子力損害賠償支援機構法の制定と槪要", ジュリスト, (1433), pp.32~36 (2011), 有斐閣
- 柳沼充彦, "東海村JCOウラン加工工場臨界事故を振り返る", 立法と 調査, (338), pp.131~144 (2013), 參議院事務局
- 日向健, "原子力損害の賠償に關する法律と原子力基本法, 及び, 核 廢棄物處理場について", 經營學情報學論集, (19), pp.43~49 (2013), 山梨學 院大學
- 張貞旭, "日本の原子力損害賠償制度の法經濟的分析", 環境と公害, 26(1), pp.55~60 (1996), 岩波書店
- 張貞旭, "日韓の原子力保險の現狀と問題点", 日本リスク硏究學會誌, 9(1), pp.35~42 (1997), 日本リスク硏究學會
- 張貞旭, "日本の原子力損害賠償制度と東海村の臨界事故", 人間と環境, 27(1), pp.30~36 (2001), 日本環境會議
- 張貞旭, "越境汚染における國家(專屬)責任の法經濟分析", 松山大學 論集, 16(2), pp.39~56 (2004), 松山大學
- 張貞旭, "賠償責任ルールと賠償資力の經濟分析", 財政と公共政策, 29(2), pp.73~85 (2007), 財政學硏究會
- 張貞旭, "中國における原子力推進政策の現狀と課題", 松山大學論集, 20(3), pp.1~24 (2008), 松山大學
- 張貞旭, "福島第一原發事故の賠償のゆくえ", 都市問題, 102(12), pp.18~22 (2011), 東京市政調査會
- 張貞旭, "福島第一原發事故と原子力損害賠償制度の限界", 經濟科學 通信, (127), pp.60~65 (2011), 基礎經濟科學硏究所
- 田邊朋行, "アジア地域における原子力損害賠償國際枠組み構築と 我が國の法制度上の課題", 電力中央硏究, (51), pp.1~17 (2004), 電力中央 硏究所
- 足立格, "原子力損害の範囲判定等に關する中間指針の解說", ビジネス法務, 11(12), pp.25~36 (2011), 中央經濟社
- 佐藤大介, "原子力損害賠償制度に對する原子力損害賠償支援機構の 影響", 損害保險硏究, 74(2), pp.81~104 (2012), 損害保險事業總合硏究 所