전후 일본, 한국, 대만의 국어교과서와 국가 이데올로기 전환에 관한 연구
A Study on the Conversion of Textbooks and National Ideology in Postwar Japan, Korea, and Taiwan
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study compares national language education and ideology contained in national language textbooks among the educational policies implemented in the situation of South Korea and Japan after the postwar U.S. military politics with Taiwan's national language education in the days of the KMT government. saw. As a result, it was found that Japanese language education during the U.S. military era focused on the personality and social growth of each child who learns from the thoughts that forced Japan to impose militarism and nationalism. . In the wake of the three-year U.S. military politics, South Korea established an educational policy in a very confusing atmosphere, but the textbooks issued by the Governor-General of Korea during the Japanese colonial era were transferred through the early textbooks. It turned out that it was a textbook that did. On the other hand, Taiwan, where a new textbook was created by the KMT government, the appearance of decolonization was clearly visible. However, the appearance of such a deliberate decolonization, on the other hand, only changed the subject, and it was no different from the education during the Japanese colonial period.
Abstract
This study compares national language education and ideology contained in national language textbooks among the educational policies implemented in the situation of South Korea and Japan after the postwar U.S. military politics with Taiwan's national language education in the days of the KMT government. saw. As a result, it was found that Japanese language education during the U.S. military era focused on the personality and social growth of each child who learns from the thoughts that forced Japan to impose militarism and nationalism. . In the wake of the three-year U.S. military politics, South Korea established an educational policy in a very confusing atmosphere, but the textbooks issued by the Governor-General of Korea during the Japanese colonial era were transferred through the early textbooks. It turned out that it was a textbook that did. On the other hand, Taiwan, where a new textbook was created by the KMT government, the appearance of decolonization was clearly visible. However, the appearance of such a deliberate decolonization, on the other hand, only changed the subject, and it was no different from the education during the Japanese colonial period.
참고문헌 (18)
- 강진호, "국어교과서의 탄생", pp.366~377 (2017), 글누림
- 김상훈, "미군정기 교육정책 수립과 한국인의 역할", 역사연구, (28), pp.119~163 (2015), 역사학연구소
- 김진두, "미군정기 교과서 출판 연구", 출판잡지연구, 21(1) (2013), 출판문화학회
- 송숙정, "일제강점기 일본과 조선 및 대만 국어독본의 표기에 관한 비교연구", pp.2015
- 송숙정, "일본 미군정기 국어독본의 내용분석에 관한 연구 —먹물칠로 삭제된 제5기 국정독본을 중심으로—", 일본연구, (50), pp.49~63 (2019), 일본연구소[DOI]
- 오성철, "전후 동아시아의 교육개혁 비교 연구 - 한국ㆍ대만ㆍ일본을 중심으로 -", 한국초등교육, 25(1), pp.1~20 (2014), 초등교육연구원[DOI]
- 오성철, "현대 한국과 대만의 초등교육 확대과정 비교 연구", 한국초등교육, 18(2), pp.165~183 (2008), 초등교육연구원[DOI]
- 이길상, "미군정기 초등교육의 변화", 한국교육사학, 25(2), pp.75~110 (2003), 한국교육사학회
- 이희호, "미군정기 『한글 첫걸음』 교재에 대한 맥락 연구", 겨레어문학, (48), pp.517~553 (2012), 겨레어문학회[DOI]
- 정영훈, "미군정기 국어 교과서의 편찬 과정 재론 -조선어학회와 조선문화건설중앙협의회의 관계를 중심으로-", 배달말, (50), pp.198~222 (2012), 배달말학회[DOI]
- 허재영, "과도기(1945~1955)의 국어과 교과서", 교육한글, (17), pp.59~90 (2004), 한글학회
- 磯水絵, "戦後日本の国語教育", pp.67~96 (2018), 沖山光研究会
- 唐澤富太郎, "教科書の歴史", pp.481~ (1980), 創文社
- 黃英哲, "戦後台湾における「国語」運動の展開:巍建ス功の役割をめぐって", 法学研究:法律・政治・社会, 75(1), pp.401~427 (2002), 慶應義塾大学法学研究会
- 佐渡泉, "国語教科書の戦後史", pp.1~8 (2006), 勁草書房
- 陳虹彣, "終戦直後台湾における教科書編纂に関する一考察", 東北大学大学院教育学研究科研究年報, 55(1), pp.15~36 (2006), 東北大学
- 野村敏夫, "国語政策の戦後史", pp.21~54 (2006), 大修館書店
- 森田健嗣, "戦後初期台湾における言語政策研究再考ー代行された脱植民地の視角から", 日本台湾学会報, (16), pp.107~125 (2014), 日本台湾学会
