노동쟁의에 대한 업무방해죄 적용의 축소 가능성
A Critical Approach to the practice of applying Criminal Act Article 314 to Labor Dispute
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Some acts are done as a part of social activity and are generally accepted; however, these acts could also be violation of law in some cases. Labour disputes are among these that could also be happening at this very moment; inevitably, some would turn into criminal cases. In a significant number of these cases are the offenders punished upon conviction with ‘Interference with Business’ in Criminal Act, not for violating Labour Relations Adjustment Act. Labour Law authorities, as well as those in criminal law, have been posing questions regarding practice in these incidents. In this regard, while the Constitutional Court has recently issued a ruling that Criminal Act Article 314 ‘Interference with Business by force’ is constitutional, they have also indicated the application of it has to be done carefully. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the decision by the Constitutional Court, to examine issues involved with Criminal Act Article 314; and finally, personal opinions are discussed in order to suggest some solutions. In conclusion, ‘restriktive Interpretation’ of Criminal Act Article 314 is required, because this article should not an obstacle to Labour Dispute.
Abstract
Some acts are done as a part of social activity and are generally accepted; however, these acts could also be violation of law in some cases. Labour disputes are among these that could also be happening at this very moment; inevitably, some would turn into criminal cases. In a significant number of these cases are the offenders punished upon conviction with ‘Interference with Business’ in Criminal Act, not for violating Labour Relations Adjustment Act. Labour Law authorities, as well as those in criminal law, have been posing questions regarding practice in these incidents. In this regard, while the Constitutional Court has recently issued a ruling that Criminal Act Article 314 ‘Interference with Business by force’ is constitutional, they have also indicated the application of it has to be done carefully. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the decision by the Constitutional Court, to examine issues involved with Criminal Act Article 314; and finally, personal opinions are discussed in order to suggest some solutions. In conclusion, ‘restriktive Interpretation’ of Criminal Act Article 314 is required, because this article should not an obstacle to Labour Dispute.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김일수, "형법각론 6판"
- 이재상, "형법각론 5판", pp.205~
- 이형국, "업무방해죄", 고시연구, pp.74~75 (1995)
- 김일수, "한국형법 III", pp.425~
- 鄭鎭京, "爭議行爲의 節次的 正當性과 業務妨害罪 - 組合員 贊反投票를 거치지 아니한 爭議行爲를 중심으로 -", 저스티스, 72, pp.201~244 (2003), 한국법학원
- 오현환, "쟁의행위와 형사책임에 관한 연구-업무방해죄와 관련하여", 석사, pp.1999
- 장영민, "노동쟁의행위와 업무방해죄의 관계" (1996), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김순태, , 민주법학, (12) (1997)
- 유기천, "형법학 각론강의 上(전정신판)", pp.169~ (1985), 일조각
- 김순태, "업무방해죄에 관한 연구-쟁의행위와 관련하여", 박사, pp.1993
- 배종대, "형법각론", pp.248~
- "대판 1992.11.10. 92도1315", ~
- "대판 2001.11.30, 2001도2015", ~
- 박상기, "형법각론, 제7판", pp.205~ (2008), 박영사
- 임지봉, "업무방해죄의 적용에 관한 헌법적 고찰 ― 헌법재판소 결정의 규범적 이해 ―", 노동법학, (34), pp.109~134 (2010), 한국노동법학회
