본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

韓国語の「저」「나」に対応する日本語の自称代名詞の使用に関して - 韓日対訳資料の分析を中心に -

The Use of Japanese First-Person Pronouns Corresponding to Korean "jeo" "na" - Focused on the analysis of the Korean-Japanese translation text -

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This thesis analyzes texts of Japanese translation from a Korean novel in order to study how Japanese first-person pronouns are used in Korean-Japanese translation First, when the speaker is female, "watashi" corresponds to "jeo" and "na" and "atashi" corresponds to "na" which is relatively less polite than "jeo". This shows that "watashi" which is used by female speakers is used both in formal and informal circumstances in general. Second, when the speaker is male, "watashi" corresponds to "jeo" and "na" as is used by female speakers but there is a gender difference in the identification of level of treatment in a sense that "watashi" is used in more formal circumstances when spoken by male speakers. "boku" is a first-person pronoun that is used only by men in more informal circumstances than "watashi" but in reality, it can correspond to "jeo" and is used more widely than its traditional perception. "Ore" has been perceived to be used in much more informal circumstances when compared with "watashi" and "boku" but the analysis shows that it can correspond to "jeo" and is used even in polite expressions in Japanese in some cases. Also according to the analysis, the male speaker distinguishes "boku" and "ore", depending on the top-bottom relationship and close/distant relationship with the listener, the gender of the listener, the change of close/distant relationship, and the change of speaking scenes. Lastly, the result of analysis demonstrates that the distinction among "watashi", "boku", and "ore" is becoming blurred in line with changing times and therefore, a Japanese first-person pronoun that corresponds to "jeo“ is not limited to "watshi" and a Japanese first-person pronoun that corresponds to "na” is used in diverse ways according to speaker's relationship with the listener, speaking scenes, and speaker's characters.

Abstract

This thesis analyzes texts of Japanese translation from a Korean novel in order to study how Japanese first-person pronouns are used in Korean-Japanese translation First, when the speaker is female, "watashi" corresponds to "jeo" and "na" and "atashi" corresponds to "na" which is relatively less polite than "jeo". This shows that "watashi" which is used by female speakers is used both in formal and informal circumstances in general. Second, when the speaker is male, "watashi" corresponds to "jeo" and "na" as is used by female speakers but there is a gender difference in the identification of level of treatment in a sense that "watashi" is used in more formal circumstances when spoken by male speakers. "boku" is a first-person pronoun that is used only by men in more informal circumstances than "watashi" but in reality, it can correspond to "jeo" and is used more widely than its traditional perception. "Ore" has been perceived to be used in much more informal circumstances when compared with "watashi" and "boku" but the analysis shows that it can correspond to "jeo" and is used even in polite expressions in Japanese in some cases. Also according to the analysis, the male speaker distinguishes "boku" and "ore", depending on the top-bottom relationship and close/distant relationship with the listener, the gender of the listener, the change of close/distant relationship, and the change of speaking scenes. Lastly, the result of analysis demonstrates that the distinction among "watashi", "boku", and "ore" is becoming blurred in line with changing times and therefore, a Japanese first-person pronoun that corresponds to "jeo“ is not limited to "watshi" and a Japanese first-person pronoun that corresponds to "na” is used in diverse ways according to speaker's relationship with the listener, speaking scenes, and speaker's characters.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 가혜경, "한·일 양국어 1, 2인칭 대명사의 용법 비교", 일본어문학, 6, pp.111~133 (1998), 한국일본어문학회
  2. 남기심, "표준 국어문법론", pp.77~78 (1993), 탑출판사
  3. 허정숙, "한·일 인칭 대명사의 ジェンダ― 고찰 : 소설의 용례를 중심으로", 석사, 일본어교육, pp.2008
  4. 教師用日本語教育ハンドブック5語彙, "浅野百合子", 国際交流基金日本語国際センター, 57~58 (1991)
  5. 林炫情他, "日本語と韓国語における呼称選択の適切性", 日本語科学, 11, pp.31~54 (2002), 国立国語研究所
  6. 金丸芙美, "女性語の世界", pp.15~32 (1997), 明治書院
  7. 金水敏, "ヴァーチャル日本語 役割語の謎", 岩波書店, pp.205~207 (2003)
  8. 小林美恵子, "自称·対称は中性化するか?", pp.113~137 (1997), ひつじ書房
  9. 鈴木孝夫, "ことばと文化", pp.129~206 (1973), 岩波新書
  10. 鄭惠先, "日本語と韓国語の人称詞に関する対照研究", 人間文化学研究集録, 10, pp.33~45 (2001), 大阪府立大学大学院人間文化学研究科
  11. 鄭惠先, "日本語人称詞の社会言語学的研究", 석사, pp.2003
  12. 中村桃子, "〈性〉と日本語-ことばがつくる女と男-", pp.59~82 (2007), 日本放送出版協会
  13. 中村桃子, "翻訳がつくる日本語-ヒロインは「女ことば」を話し続ける-", pp.69~70 (2013), 白澤社
  14. 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法 7", pp.37~41 (2009), 現代日本語文法
  15. 野元菊雄, "敬語を使いこなす", pp.105~106 (1987), 講談社
  16. 李徳霞, "若い世代の話し言葉における日本語の性差について-終助詞と人称代名詞を中心に-", 社会環境研究, 8, pp.137~145 (2003), 金沢大学
  17. 두산동아 사서편집국, "프라임 한일사전" (2006), 두산동아
  18. 松村明, "大辞林" (2006), 三省堂

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)