동북아시아 사형제도의 현실에 대한 비판적 성찰
Critical Reflection on the Status Quo of the Death Penalty in Northeast Asia
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
If one takes a close look at a death penalty system of North East Asia, Republic of Korea, China, Japan, one will find out that these countries have a common characteristic of maintaining a death penalty. Their death penalty system’s existence evidences are relied on public opinion which is not identifiable. However, a background of public opinion is rooted deeply from Confucianism, Asian’s value. Confucianism, consequently, blocked to naturalize western society’s right concept and philosophy of men’s dignity. In north east asia’s society, aims for punishment are education and means of rebirth, which I agree, however, when it comes to maintain nation’s system, existence of death penalty means acknowledgement that they cannot rule by rules. Thus, to change the notion, korea should not take a death penalty as a nation’s problem and civil right problems. They should exercise major influence on abolition of East asia’s death penalty and enforce to recognize it by enact it to international problems which is in need of intervention. Today, the world is moving toward vanishing a death penalty system. From 1977 to 2010, numbers of countries abolished a death penalty were increased dramatically from 11 to 139 in that, it is a result which is a global, societal, mutual interest and should be solved by international society. Thus, the republic of Korea should also join the international agreement which were adapted by UN as soon as possible and be prepared for ratification. Times that economic power decides nation’s quality had been already passed by, therefore, Korea should mediate to spirit of world’s civil right announcement to improve human dignity and develop human right and also participate to abolish death penalty.
Abstract
If one takes a close look at a death penalty system of North East Asia, Republic of Korea, China, Japan, one will find out that these countries have a common characteristic of maintaining a death penalty. Their death penalty system’s existence evidences are relied on public opinion which is not identifiable. However, a background of public opinion is rooted deeply from Confucianism, Asian’s value. Confucianism, consequently, blocked to naturalize western society’s right concept and philosophy of men’s dignity. In north east asia’s society, aims for punishment are education and means of rebirth, which I agree, however, when it comes to maintain nation’s system, existence of death penalty means acknowledgement that they cannot rule by rules. Thus, to change the notion, korea should not take a death penalty as a nation’s problem and civil right problems. They should exercise major influence on abolition of East asia’s death penalty and enforce to recognize it by enact it to international problems which is in need of intervention. Today, the world is moving toward vanishing a death penalty system. From 1977 to 2010, numbers of countries abolished a death penalty were increased dramatically from 11 to 139 in that, it is a result which is a global, societal, mutual interest and should be solved by international society. Thus, the republic of Korea should also join the international agreement which were adapted by UN as soon as possible and be prepared for ratification. Times that economic power decides nation’s quality had been already passed by, therefore, Korea should mediate to spirit of world’s civil right announcement to improve human dignity and develop human right and also participate to abolish death penalty.
참고문헌 (43)
- John Pratt, "Penal Populism", pp.8~28 (2007), ROUTLEDGE
- Zimring Franklin E., "Deterrence: Legal Treat in Crime Control", pp.71~ (1973), The University of Chicago Press
- Isaac Ehrlich, "The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Question of Life and Death", American Economic Review, pp.397~417 (1975)
- Hashem Dezhbakhsh, "Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Post-Moratorium Panel Data" (2002), Department of Economics, Emory University
- John Sorenson, "Capital Punishment and Deterrence: Examining the Effect of Execution on Murder in Texas", Crime and Delinquency, pp.481~493 (1999)
- W. C. Bailey, "Murder, Capital Punishment, and I Deterrence: A Review of the Literature. in: The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies" (1997), Oxford University Press
- William J. Bowers, "The Illusion of Deterrence in Isaac Ehrlich's Research on Capital Punishment", Yale University Law Journal, pp.187~208 (1975)
- Chan Janet, "The deterrent effect of capital punishment: review of the research evidence", Crime and Justice(Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice), pp.1~21 (2004)
- Roger Hood, "The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective, third edition", pp.214~ (2002), Oxford University Press
- R. H. Gault, "Find No Unjust Hangings", Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, pp.131~ (1912)
- E. M. Borchard, "Convicting the Innocent" (1932), Yale University Press
- M. Hirschberg, "Wrongful Convictions", Rocky Mountain Law Review, pp.20~46 (1940)
- R. C. Donnelly, "Unconvicting the Innocent", Vanderbilt Law Review, pp.20~40 (1952)
- M. Radelet, "In Spite of Innocence(1995의 개정판 서문)" (1995), Northeastern University Press
- 2009년 하반기 제8차 조사보고서 제8권, "진실화해위원회", 진실화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회, 41~ (2009)
- 大野徹, "アジア伝統社会における刑罰制度", 大阪外国語大学論集, (33), pp.103~ (2006), 大阪外国語大学
- 張凌, "中国刑事法における死刑の手続", 早稲田法学会誌, (48), pp.161~198 (1998), 早稲田大学法学会
- 趙秉志, "非暴力的犯罪に対して死刑を次第に廃止する問題", 札幌学院法学, 21(2), pp.165~ (2005), 札幌学院大学法学会
- 陳興良, "刑法的人性基礎", pp.531~532 (1996), 中国政法大学出版社
- 今井竜也, "臓器売買問題と生命倫理学の視点", 社会環境研究, (7), pp.132~ (2002), 金沢大学
- BLOODY HARVEST Revised Report into Allegations of Organ Harvesting of Falun Gong Practitioners in China, "David Matas", 14~15 (2007)
- "朝日新聞, 2007年 2月 25日", ~ (2007)
- 馬競, "河北 ‘唯是眞凶’ 疑案引人關注, 法制日報, 2005. 3. 18", 2~ (2005)
- 最高裁判所, "判決 1948年 3月 12日(村上事件)(大法廷), 刑集2号", 191~ (1948)
- 最高裁判所, "判決 1955年 4月 6日(平沢事件)(大法廷), 刑集9号", 663~ (1955)
- Chin Kim, "Capital Punishment in the United States and Japan: Constitutionality, Justification and Methods of Infliction", Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal, pp.253~280 (1989)
- 菊田幸一, "The Death Penalty in Japan: Why Hasn't It Been Abolished?", Meiji Law Journal (1994), Meiji university
- 死刑に関する世論調査(Public Opinion Regarding Death Penalty), "内閣府", ~ (1967)
- 犯罪と処罰に関する世論調査(Public Opinion Regarding Crime and Punishment), "内閣府", ~ (1989)
- Shigemitsu Dando, "Towards the Abolition of the Death Penalty", Indiana Law Journal, pp.10~ (1996)
- Johnson David T., "Japanese Punishment in Comparative Perspective(Globalized Penal Populism and its Countermeasures)", Japanese Journal of Sociological Criminology, pp.46~66 (2008), Japanese Association of Sociological Criminology
- 浜井浩一, "Genbatsuka: Growing Penal Populism and the Changing Role of Public Prosecutors in Japan?(Globalized Penal Populism and its Countermeasures)", Japanese Journal of Sociological Criminology, pp.67~92 (2008), Japanese Association of Sociological Criminology
- 団藤重光, "第5版 死刑廢止論" (1997), 有斐閣
- Shigemitsu Dando, "Towards the Abolition of the Death Penalty", Indiana Law Journal, pp.13~16 (1996)
- 高見澤昭治, "検証 冤罪はこうしてつくられた(上): 無実の死刑囚-三鷹事件 竹内景助をめぐって", 法と民主主義, (446), pp.55~ (2010), 日本民主法律家協会
- William Shaw, "Legal Norms in a Confusion State", pp.9~ (1981), Institute of East Asian Studies
- Randle Coyne, "Capital Punishment and the Judicial Process", pp.685~ (1994), Carolina Academic Press
- W. A. Schabas, "The Abolition of the Death Penalty International Law, (2nd edn)", pp.20~ (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Timothy Brook, "Death by a Thousand Cuts" (2008), Harvard University Press
- Bourgon, Jérôme, "Abolishing Cruel Punishments: A Reappraisal of the Chinese Roots and Long-Term Efficiency of the in Legal Reforms", Modern Asian Studies, 37(4), pp.851~862 (2003)