조선시대 윤음 언해본에 나타난 인용구조 연구
A Syntactic Study of Quotative Clauses of Yuneum Eonhaebon in Joseon Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to find the syntactic rules in quotative clauses of Yuneum eonhaebon in Joseon dynasty. This paper can be summarized as follows. Quotation is classified into direct quotation, indirect quotation, and formal quotation. Formal quotations take up almost half of the entire quotations. Among the direct quotation, examples of ‘× [ ] hʌ-’ pattern that is similar to the modern were used a little. Indirect quotation is classified into abstract indirect quotation, transformational indirect quotation, and naming indirect quotation. In the abstract indirect quotation, ‘× [ ] hʌ-’ pattern appears much more than ‘kʌl-o-dʌi [ ] hʌ-’ pattern. Compared to the direct quotation, this is a distinctly different result. The transformational indirect quotation was used less than the others. Most of the naming indirect quotations were the same of the Middle ages Korean’s structures. It seems to conservative attribute of royal language. Formal quotation has a form of quotation but it is not quoted from one's speech or the writings. Interpretative formal quotations were used much more than interpretative-object formal quotations In this study, my opinion is ‘nil-on-ba’ is lexicalized adverb that combined fossilized adnominal form ‘nil-on’ with bound noun ‘ba’. For more in-depth discussion, there is need for a more careful look at 18․19th century’s quotation structures.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find the syntactic rules in quotative clauses of Yuneum eonhaebon in Joseon dynasty. This paper can be summarized as follows. Quotation is classified into direct quotation, indirect quotation, and formal quotation. Formal quotations take up almost half of the entire quotations. Among the direct quotation, examples of ‘× [ ] hʌ-’ pattern that is similar to the modern were used a little. Indirect quotation is classified into abstract indirect quotation, transformational indirect quotation, and naming indirect quotation. In the abstract indirect quotation, ‘× [ ] hʌ-’ pattern appears much more than ‘kʌl-o-dʌi [ ] hʌ-’ pattern. Compared to the direct quotation, this is a distinctly different result. The transformational indirect quotation was used less than the others. Most of the naming indirect quotations were the same of the Middle ages Korean’s structures. It seems to conservative attribute of royal language. Formal quotation has a form of quotation but it is not quoted from one's speech or the writings. Interpretative formal quotations were used much more than interpretative-object formal quotations In this study, my opinion is ‘nil-on-ba’ is lexicalized adverb that combined fossilized adnominal form ‘nil-on’ with bound noun ‘ba’. For more in-depth discussion, there is need for a more careful look at 18․19th century’s quotation structures.
참고문헌 (22)
- 강인선, "15세기 국어의 인용구조 연구", 석사, 언어, pp.1977
- 권재일, "한국어 인용 구문 유형의 변화와 인용 표지의 생성", 언어학, 22, pp.59~79 (1998), 한국언어학회
- 권재일, "한국어 발화동사 구문 기술", 한말연구, 7, pp.1~26 (2000), 한말연구학회
- 김수태, "인용월 연구" (1999), 부산대출판부
- 김영희, "내포 접속문", 한글, 261, pp.173~206 (2003), 한글학회
- 김주필, "역주 어제(언해), 역주 어제조훈(언해)" (2006), 도서출판 역락
- 신선경, "인용문의 구조와 유형분류", 국어연구, 73, pp.46~64 (1986), 서울대학교 국어연구회
- 안귀남, "경북방언의 간접인용문 연구", 언어과학연구, (42), pp.45~80 (2007), 언어과학회
- 안주호, "후기 근대국어의 인용문 연구", 석사, pp.1991
- 안주호, "인용문과 인용표지의 문법화에 대한 연구", 담화와 인지, 10(1), pp.145~165 (2003), 담화·인지언어학회
- 안주호, "인용동사의 문법적 고찰- 근대국어를 중심으로", 우리말글, 37, pp.143~169 (2006), 우리말글학회
- 윤용선, "15세기 언해자료와 구결문" (2003), 도서출판 역락
- 윤혜영, "17세기 국어의 인용구조 연구", 박사, pp.2008
- 윤혜영, "<여사서 언해>에 나타난 인용구조 연구", 어문학, (112), pp.49~78 (2011), 한국어문학회
- 이필영, "국어의 인용구문 연구" (1995), 탑출판사
- 이현희, "중세 국어의 내적 화법의 성격", 한신논문집, 3, pp.191~227 (1986), 한신대학
- 전정예, "새로운 국어사 연구론", pp.133~169 (2010), 경진출판사
- 허웅, "국어학" (1989), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 통어론" (1999), 샘문화사
- 허원욱, "15세기 국어의 인용마디", 한글, (226), pp.203~220 (1994), 한글학회
- 허원욱, "중세국어 말풀이 인용구조 연구", 한말연구, (23), pp.453~472 (2008), 한말연구학회
