본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조건 표현 ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’에 대한 연구- 한국어 교육의 측면에서 -

A study on condition expression ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’ in Korean language education

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The goal of Korean education is smooth communication. Therefore, it is more than necessary to disclose the constraints and define semantic functions clearly when learning grammar, which is its goal. Also, restricting pragmatic and narrative situations and determining which situations such grammar is generally used and how it is different from similar grammar would also be the most effective way to reduce errors and carry successful communication. In addition, using proper grammar that corresponds to speaker’s intention would enhance expression and help improve listener’s understanding. Based on such perspective, this study focused on ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’, which connects two propositions as a condition and result. ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’ can’t be properly explained just with the combination of compositions, so it needs to be understood as one sentence structure and examined for its syntactic and semantic functions. In Korean education, ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’ was rarely focused on, either in the grammar study that describes about the condition or the bound noun phrase study. However, not only it is frequently used and discussed frequently in bound nound phrase studies, it is frequently used as a question in Korean proficiency test that studies on ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’ would be essential. Through the comparison with conditional connective ending ‘-으면’, this study determined that ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’ is usually used to express what is already realized or speaker’s firm belief that it will be realized when examining the semantic function, and has a pragmatic characteristic that expresses limited condition. Also, in terms of syntactic restriction relationship, it can be combined with state verb under certain conditions, unlike what is suggested in Korean textbooks, and the study also examined about restrictions in tense morpheme combination, characteristics in following clause mood and restrictions in semantic marker combination. Lastly, it suggested uses among various uses of ‘-으면’ that can’t be substituted with ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’.

Abstract

The goal of Korean education is smooth communication. Therefore, it is more than necessary to disclose the constraints and define semantic functions clearly when learning grammar, which is its goal. Also, restricting pragmatic and narrative situations and determining which situations such grammar is generally used and how it is different from similar grammar would also be the most effective way to reduce errors and carry successful communication. In addition, using proper grammar that corresponds to speaker’s intention would enhance expression and help improve listener’s understanding. Based on such perspective, this study focused on ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’, which connects two propositions as a condition and result. ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’ can’t be properly explained just with the combination of compositions, so it needs to be understood as one sentence structure and examined for its syntactic and semantic functions. In Korean education, ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’ was rarely focused on, either in the grammar study that describes about the condition or the bound noun phrase study. However, not only it is frequently used and discussed frequently in bound nound phrase studies, it is frequently used as a question in Korean proficiency test that studies on ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’ would be essential. Through the comparison with conditional connective ending ‘-으면’, this study determined that ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’ is usually used to express what is already realized or speaker’s firm belief that it will be realized when examining the semantic function, and has a pragmatic characteristic that expresses limited condition. Also, in terms of syntactic restriction relationship, it can be combined with state verb under certain conditions, unlike what is suggested in Korean textbooks, and the study also examined about restrictions in tense morpheme combination, characteristics in following clause mood and restrictions in semantic marker combination. Lastly, it suggested uses among various uses of ‘-으면’ that can’t be substituted with ‘-(으)ㄴ/는 한’.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 권재일, "국어의 복합문 구성 연구" (1989), 집문당
  2. 김승곤, "가정형 어미 ‘-면’과 ‘-거든’에 대하여", 인문과학논총, 12, pp.27~42 (1979), 건국대학교부설 인문과학연구소
  3. 김지은, "우리말 양태용언 구문 연구" (1998), 한국문화사
  4. 방성원, "한국어 學習者를 대상으로 한 敎育 文法의 개발 방향 -학교 문법과 外國語로서의 한국어 문법의 비교를 바탕으로-", 어문연구(語文硏究), 31(1), pp.269~296 (2003), 한국어문교육연구회
  5. 손민숙, "한국어 조건문 연구", 겨레어문학, (11-12), pp.273~293 (1987), 건국대국어국문학 연구회
  6. Yang Shan, "한국어 고급 문법 항목 연구 : 한국어능력시험 고급 문항과 한국어 교재 고급 문법을 중심으로", 석사, 국제한국언어문화학과 한국어교육전공, pp.2012
  7. 이미혜, "한국어 문법 교수 방법론의 재고찰제2 언어 교수 이론에 바탕을 둔 교수 모형의 보완", 한국어교육, 18(2), pp.285~310 (2007), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
  8. 진지혜, "외국인을 위한 한국어 고급 문법 항목의 분석과 교육 방안의 연구 : 고급 한국어의 연결어미와 복합 형태를 중심으로", 석사, 한국어교육전공, pp.2014
  9. 최정도, "국어 의존명사 구성에 대한 연구 : 분포 제약의 계량적 특성을 중심으로", 석사, 국어정보학, pp.2007
  10. 채숙희, "연결어미 상당의 명사구 보문 구성 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2002
  11. 고려대학교 한국어문화센터, "재미있는 한국어5" (2010), 교보문고
  12. 연세대학교 한국어학당 교재편찬위원회, "연세대 한국어5" (2009), 연세대학교 출판부
  13. 2015, "문진미디어", ~
  14. 건국대학교 언어교육원, "건국대 한국어6" (2010), 건국대학교 출판사
  15. 선문대학교 한국어 교육원, "선문 한국어 중급Ⅲ" (2016), 소통
  16. 연세대학교 한국어학당, "연세 대학한국어 어휘·문법 고급" (2016), 연세대학교 대학출판문화원
  17. 이정희, "경희 한국어 문법4" (2015), 도서출판 하우
  18. 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어문법2" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
  19. 김훈, "한국어 선생님과 함께하는 토픽 한국어 문법Ⅱ" (2018), ㈜시대고시기획
  20. 안미영, "한국어 교사와 유학생을 위한 한국어 문법 중급" (2016), 소통

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)