본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국어학 전공자의 정치 이념에 따른 국어 정책에 대한 태도 분석

Analysis of attitude toward Korean language policy by Korean linguistics’s political ideology

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to find out correlation between political belief among majors in Korean linguistics and attitudes toward language policy. For this study, 100 majors in Korean linguistics were participated in a questionnaire as study subjects. The significant results from the study are described as follows. Firstly, it was found that the ratio of conservative subjects was markedly higher than progressive subjects for supporting regulation for codified standard language. Secondly, progressive subjects were more supportive of reforming discriminatory expressions than conservative subjects. Thirdly, there was not a significant difference in opinions about a use of honorific, among conservative and progressive subjects. Fourthly, there was not a significant difference in opinions about an exclusive use of Hangeul, among conservative and progressive subjects. Fifthly, there was not a difference in position regarding a use of English as an official language, based on the subjects’ political belief, however, the conservative subjects were slightly more supportive than progressive subjects. Sixthly, regarding language standard for North and South Korea after unification, the conservative subjects supported for using South Korea standard language norm while the progressive subjects were likely to support balance between South and North language norms. Therefore, there was a high correlation between the subjects’ political belief and language policy after unification.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out correlation between political belief among majors in Korean linguistics and attitudes toward language policy. For this study, 100 majors in Korean linguistics were participated in a questionnaire as study subjects. The significant results from the study are described as follows. Firstly, it was found that the ratio of conservative subjects was markedly higher than progressive subjects for supporting regulation for codified standard language. Secondly, progressive subjects were more supportive of reforming discriminatory expressions than conservative subjects. Thirdly, there was not a significant difference in opinions about a use of honorific, among conservative and progressive subjects. Fourthly, there was not a significant difference in opinions about an exclusive use of Hangeul, among conservative and progressive subjects. Fifthly, there was not a difference in position regarding a use of English as an official language, based on the subjects’ political belief, however, the conservative subjects were slightly more supportive than progressive subjects. Sixthly, regarding language standard for North and South Korea after unification, the conservative subjects supported for using South Korea standard language norm while the progressive subjects were likely to support balance between South and North language norms. Therefore, there was a high correlation between the subjects’ political belief and language policy after unification.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 김선철, "표준 발음법과 언어 현실", 새국어생활, 14(1), pp.45~65 (2004), 국립국어원
  2. 김선철, "중앙어의 음운론적 변이 양상" (2006), 경진문화사
  3. 김정대, "공통어 정책-표준어 정책의 새로운 모색", 2006년 언어정책 토론회자료집, pp.25~38 (2006), 국립국어원
  4. 김진해, "중심 지향의 문화 넘어서기", 언어 자원의 다원화를 위한 학술 세미나 자료집 (2008)
  5. 2015년 국민의 언어 의식조사, "김창영", 국립국어원, ~ (2015)
  6. 민현식, "금기어로서의 욕설과 공정언어(PC)", 사회언어학, 27(1), pp.25~65 (2019), 한국사회언어학회[DOI]
  7. 박동근, "공공언어의 차별적 표현에 차별 의식 연구", 입법정책, 4(1), pp.57~88 (2010), 한국입법정책학회
  8. 박동근, "<표준어 규정> 무용론에 대한 비판적 접근", 한말연구, (32), pp.99~132 (2013), 한말연구학회[DOI]
  9. 박동근, "법률 조문의 차별적 언어 표현 연구", 한말연구, (34), pp.73~103 (2014), 한말연구학회[DOI]
  10. 박동근, "표준어 선정 원칙에 대한 새로운 방향 모색", 한국어학, 67, pp.29~57 (2015), 한국어학회
  11. 박영순, "한국의 언어 계획과 언어 정책에 대하여", 사회언어학, 6(2) (1998), 한국사회언어학회
  12. 신승용, "사전을 통해 본 표준어의 문제점과 표준어 정책의 방향성에 대한 제언", 언어와 정보 사회, 11, pp.69~94 (2009), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  13. 신승용, "표준어 정책의 문제점과 대안 ― 획일성과 통일성에서 문화적 다양성의 존중과 수용으로 ―", 어문학, (123), pp.67~89 (2014), 한국어문학회
  14. 신지영, "어문 규정 폐지를 통한 어문 규범의 현실화", 새국어생활, 21(4) (2011), 국립국어원
  15. 이상규, "한국어의 규범성과 다양성-표준어 넘어서기", pp.95~136 (2008), 태학사
  16. 이상규, "한국어의 규범성과 다양성-표준어넘어서기" (2008), 태학사
  17. 이정복, "한국 사회의 차별 언어" (2014), 소통
  18. 사회적 의사소통 연구-차별적, 비객관적 언어 표현 개선을 위한 기초 연구, "조태린", 국립국어원, ~ (2006)
  19. 조태린, "성문화된 규정 중심의 표준어 정책 비판에 대한오해와 재론", 國語學, (79), pp.67~104 (2016), 국어학회[DOI]
  20. 조태린, "언어 예절에 대한 언어 정책적 개입에 관한 비판적 고찰", 國語學, (87), pp.145~184 (2018), 국어학회[DOI]
  21. 최용기, "표준어와 표준어 정책", 제46회 한국언어문화학회 학술대회 자료집, pp.73~87 (2008)
  22. 허만길, "한국 현대 국어 정책 연구" (1994), 국학자료원
  23. "EBS <다큐프라임> 킹메이커 제2부:“중도파는 중간에 있지 않다.”", EBS 방송, ~ (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)