부정 축약형 어휘 ‘X잖-’에 대한 고찰- 축약의 양상과 축약 유형을 중심으로 -
A study on negative contraction “X + jan(잖)”- In Regard to the Aspects and Types of Contraction -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current study synthetically analyzes the contracted negative form “X + 잖.” This study shows that contracted negative words with the form of X + 잖 can be completed either with or without a pre-contraction word(X). In case in which X exists, a negative particle is combined with X to make a contracted negative vocabulary. In the absence of X, on the other hand, a completely new contracted negative word is created. The aspects of contraction is affected by various factors, such as the style changes of X, the existence of pre-contraction and post-contraction vocabulary, and semantic relations between words. In this study, 19 words were selected from all the words with the form of X + 잖 that have been registered in the dictionary and were further classified by their types. The following chart briefly demonstrates the result of study.
Abstract
The current study synthetically analyzes the contracted negative form “X + 잖.” This study shows that contracted negative words with the form of X + 잖 can be completed either with or without a pre-contraction word(X). In case in which X exists, a negative particle is combined with X to make a contracted negative vocabulary. In the absence of X, on the other hand, a completely new contracted negative word is created. The aspects of contraction is affected by various factors, such as the style changes of X, the existence of pre-contraction and post-contraction vocabulary, and semantic relations between words. In this study, 19 words were selected from all the words with the form of X + 잖 that have been registered in the dictionary and were further classified by their types. The following chart briefly demonstrates the result of study.
참고문헌 (14)
- 김선영, "X잖", 찮- 형용사에 대하여, 2005, pp.7(1), 23~43[DOI]
- 김진수, "-‘X(하)다’와 ‘X 잖다／찮다／짢다’의 의미상관성 연구", 어문연구, 57, pp.33~55 (2008), 어문연구학회[DOI]
- 김희경, "한국어 ‘-잖", 찮X’의 통시적 변화 양상, 2008, pp.41, 283~324[DOI]
- 배주채, "'잖' 구문에 대하여", 한국학, 25(4), pp.217~240 (2002), 한국학중앙연구원
- 손세모돌, "‘-잖-’의 의미, 전제, 함축", 국어학, 33, pp.213~240 (1999), 국어학회
- 이광호, "국어 융합형 '-잖다", -찮다' 단어 형성과 그 의미, 2002, pp.25(4), 199~216[DOI]
- 이규범, "‘X찮-’의 기능과 형성 과정", 한국어학, 71, pp.133~151 (2016), 한국어학회[DOI]
- 이재현, "부정축약형 - 잖 찮 - 의 형성과 기능에 대하여", 한국의 민속과 문화, 2, pp.165~190 (1999), 경희대학교 민속학연구소
- 이지양, "국어의 융합현상" (1998), 태학사
- 이현희, "‘-잖-’은 단지 ‘-지 않-’의 음운론적 축약형인가?", 한국어학, (23), pp.203~228 (2004), 한국어학회
- 정원수, "부정형태 '잖(찮)'에 대하여", 국어국문학, (100), pp.283~294 (1988), 국어국문학회
- 최윤, "국어의 모순성 어휘·구문의 분류 및 분석", 인문과학연구, (47), pp.247~271 (2015), 인문과학연구소
- 최윤, "국어의 모순성 어휘․구문의 분류 및 분석(2)", 한국어 의미학, 57, pp.73~100 (2017), 한국어의미학회
- 한승규, "‘-지 않-’의 축약과 융합 형태 ‘-잖-’ 의 특성 연구", 언어사실과 관점, 34, pp.103~133 (2014), 언어정보연구원[DOI]