본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

疫学因果关系理论在公害犯罪认定中的运用

The Use of Epidemiological Causation theory in the Causality of Public Hazards

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

人类活动导致的环境质量危机已经严重危及我们自身的生存安全,在社会物质财富取得前所未有增长的同时,我国正面临着因环境污染而产生的叠加矛盾,直接制约着国家的后续发展. 环境侵权中的因果关系是指造成环境污染或破坏的行为和特定被害者所蒙受的损害之间具有个别的、事实上的无此就无彼的联系.由于环境侵权案件具有长期性、潜伏性、复杂性、广泛性等特点,决定了环境侵权在因果关系的认定上异常困难,所以我们必须寻求新的因果关系的理论的支持. 疫学因果关系理论对于司法审判实践中如何认定特定类型的环境侵权因果关系具有重要的指导意义,然而,对于该理论的引入,国内学者和实践部门尚存较大争议,焦点在于该理论是否与我国现行的定罪证明标准相冲突. 要厘清该问题,应当正确把握疫学因果关系理论的内容,全面、恰当地解读我国刑事诉讼法关于定罪证明标准的规定,并为该理论的司法适用构建关联制度,推动我国公害犯罪问题的解决.

Abstract

The safety of survival has been badly endangered by the environmental quality caused by human being activities. With the rapid development of social material wealth, our country is suffered from the conflict of environmental pollution, which sets limits on the further development of our country in turn. The causality in environment tort means the actions cause environment pollution or destruction and the separate, de facto cause and effect affiliation occurred among the damage that suffered by the specifically victims. The Environment tort case has the character of chronicity, latency, complexity and universality, which decide the abnormal difficulty in determination of causality in environment tort. The conventional causality theory can’t meet the demands of the damage compensation in Environment tort, so we have to find the new causality theory to support. Epidemiological causal theory is very useful in identifying the causal relations between conducts and damages in epidemiological environmental tort cases, but we haven’t developed detailed theories and methods for identifying legal causation of this kind of environmental tort. There are different opinions on whether the theory is contrary to the proof standard in China’s criminal justice. In order to solve the problem of public hazard, we shall have a better understanding of the epidemiological causation theory as well as the criminal procedure law, and to perfect and development relevant system.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 高其才, "法理学" (2011), 清华大学出版社
  2. 冷罗生, "日本公害诉讼理论与案例评析" (2005), 北京商务印书馆
  3. 迈克尔, "法律的原则" (1996), 中国大百科全书出版社
  4. 西田典之, "日本刑法总论" (2007), 中国人民大学出版社
  5. 野村好弘, "日本公害法概论" (1982), 中国环境管理出版社
  6. 郑昆山, "环境刑法之基础理论" (1998), 台北五南图书出版公司
  7. 陈兴良, "本体刑法学" (2005), 北京商务印书馆
  8. 吕忠梅, "中国环境司法现状查―以千份环境裁判文书为样本", 法学, (4) (2011)
  9. 龙宗智, "中国法语境中的‘排除合理疑’", 中外法学, (6) (2012)
  10. 张南宁, "科学证据可采性标准的认识论反思与重构", 法学研究, (1) (2010)
  11. 蒋兰香, "日本疫学因果关系理论及其对我国环境刑事司法的借鉴", 刑法论丛, (1) (2010)
  12. 陈伟, "疫学因果关系及其证明", 法学研究, (4) (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)